github-starred/pangolin
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/fosrl/pangolin.git synced 2026-05-07 21:30:36 -05:00
Code Issues 564 Packages Projects Releases 72 Wiki Activity

[GH-ISSUE #2994] User selection in Access Control does not show all users anymore #11055

New Issue
Open
opened 2026-05-06 15:44:32 -05:00 by GiteaMirror · 8 comments
GiteaMirror commented 2026-05-06 15:44:32 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @Kalvalax on GitHub (May 4, 2026).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/fosrl/pangolin/issues/2994

Originally assigned to: @oschwartz10612 on GitHub.

Describe the Bug

In the DDLB of users only a limited number of users are shown. typing in th esearch field doesn't solve the problem.

Environment

  • OS Type & Version: Ubuntu 24.04
  • Pangolin Version: 1.18.2
  • Gerbil Version: 1.3.1
  • Traefik Version: 3.6
  • Newt Version: 1.12.3
  • Olm Version: (if applicable)

To Reproduce

Open any resource and try to select users in the Access Control section.

Expected Behavior

Show all users for selection.

Originally created by @Kalvalax on GitHub (May 4, 2026). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/fosrl/pangolin/issues/2994 Originally assigned to: @oschwartz10612 on GitHub. ### Describe the Bug In the DDLB of users only a limited number of users are shown. typing in th esearch field doesn't solve the problem. ### Environment - OS Type & Version: Ubuntu 24.04 - Pangolin Version: 1.18.2 - Gerbil Version: 1.3.1 - Traefik Version: 3.6 - Newt Version: 1.12.3 - Olm Version: (if applicable) ### To Reproduce Open any resource and try to select users in the Access Control section. ### Expected Behavior Show all users for selection.
GiteaMirror added the bug label 2026-05-06 15:44:32 -05:00
GiteaMirror commented 2026-05-06 15:44:33 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@AstralDestiny commented on GitHub (May 4, 2026):

Can you still search if you type?

<!-- gh-comment-id:4372944822 --> @AstralDestiny commented on GitHub (May 4, 2026): Can you still search if you type?
GiteaMirror commented 2026-05-06 15:44:34 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@Kalvalax commented on GitHub (May 4, 2026):

Yes, but only in the 20 users in the list. No reload to get the requested onss in the list for selection.

<!-- gh-comment-id:4372962270 --> @Kalvalax commented on GitHub (May 4, 2026): Yes, but only in the 20 users in the list. No reload to get the requested onss in the list for selection.
GiteaMirror commented 2026-05-06 15:44:34 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@AstralDestiny commented on GitHub (May 4, 2026):

So if you type the other users just fail to load? Also curious why not grouping by roles

<!-- gh-comment-id:4373242374 --> @AstralDestiny commented on GitHub (May 4, 2026): So if you type the other users just fail to load? Also curious why not grouping by roles
GiteaMirror commented 2026-05-06 15:44:34 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@Fredkiss3 commented on GitHub (May 4, 2026):

Made a PR that should hopefully fix this #2893 🙏🏾

<!-- gh-comment-id:4373699151 --> @Fredkiss3 commented on GitHub (May 4, 2026): Made a PR that should hopefully fix this #2893 🙏🏾
GiteaMirror commented 2026-05-06 15:44:35 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@Kalvalax commented on GitHub (May 4, 2026):

So if you type the other users just fail to load? Also curious why not grouping by roles

We have dedicated resurces that need assignment to individual users.

<!-- gh-comment-id:4374124646 --> @Kalvalax commented on GitHub (May 4, 2026): > So if you type the other users just fail to load? Also curious why not grouping by roles We have dedicated resurces that need assignment to individual users.
GiteaMirror commented 2026-05-06 15:44:35 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@AstralDestiny commented on GitHub (May 4, 2026):

Doesn't sound fun, Though I guess I rely on ldap backed to pangolin.

<!-- gh-comment-id:4374143640 --> @AstralDestiny commented on GitHub (May 4, 2026): Doesn't sound fun, Though I guess I rely on ldap backed to pangolin.
GiteaMirror commented 2026-05-06 15:44:36 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@Kalvalax commented on GitHub (May 4, 2026):

Yes, it's a lab environment with Authentik, but users need inditidual access to individual VMs.
Luckily this doesn't change too often. Otherwise I'll solve this via API within the provisioning process.

<!-- gh-comment-id:4374160512 --> @Kalvalax commented on GitHub (May 4, 2026): Yes, it's a lab environment with Authentik, but users need inditidual access to individual VMs. Luckily this doesn't change too often. Otherwise I'll solve this via API within the provisioning process.
GiteaMirror commented 2026-05-06 15:44:36 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@AstralDestiny commented on GitHub (May 4, 2026):

Oh fun authentik.. Just make sure your db is watched and your ui.. both allow some lateral movement even non root from authentik.

<!-- gh-comment-id:4374196523 --> @AstralDestiny commented on GitHub (May 4, 2026): Oh fun ~~authentik~~.. Just make sure your db is watched and your ui.. both allow some lateral movement even non root from authentik.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
api
authentication
bug
config
dependencies
docker
documentation
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
Improvement
Look Into
needs investigating
networking
new feature
non-critical bug
potential bug
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 question
reverse proxy
Security
stale
ui
wontfix
No Label bug
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
GiteaMirror ninjasurge
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/pangolin#11055
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?