github-starred/pangolin
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/fosrl/pangolin.git synced 2026-05-22 09:32:36 -05:00
Code Issues 959 Packages Projects Releases 74 Wiki Activity

Add support for only forwarding specific url paths #103

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-11-13 11:50:07 -06:00 by GiteaMirror · 1 comment
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-13 11:50:07 -06:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @RichyHBM on GitHub (Feb 24, 2025).

As it currently stands, If I add a service to pangolin it will forward any and all requests no matter the url path.

With my previous setup using cloudflare + manual traefik setup, I could setup the traefik host rule to only respond to specific url paths as such:

  routers:    
    umami:
      rule: "Host(`analytics.domain.co.uk`) && (Path(`/script.js`) || Path(`/api/ingress`))"
      entrypoints:
        - http
      service: umami@file

Which would allow me to publicly allow those endpoints, without allowing full access to the web service.

One option could be to allow a 3rd "custom" option for setting the domain of a resource, which could allow raw traefik rule config to be put in?

Originally created by @RichyHBM on GitHub (Feb 24, 2025). As it currently stands, If I add a service to pangolin it will forward any and all requests no matter the url path. With my previous setup using cloudflare + manual traefik setup, I could setup the traefik host rule to only respond to specific url paths as such: ``` routers: umami: rule: "Host(`analytics.domain.co.uk`) && (Path(`/script.js`) || Path(`/api/ingress`))" entrypoints: - http service: umami@file ``` Which would allow me to publicly allow those endpoints, without allowing full access to the web service. One option could be to allow a 3rd "custom" option for setting the domain of a resource, which could allow raw traefik rule config to be put in?
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-13 11:50:08 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@oschwartz10612 commented on GitHub (Feb 24, 2025):

HI!

I think you might be able to do this with the rule feature in beta.14. You could create a allow rule for /script.js and /api/ingress` and then a block rule.

Check that out and let me know if that ends up working for you!

@oschwartz10612 commented on GitHub (Feb 24, 2025): HI! I think you might be able to do this with the rule feature in `beta.14`. You could create a allow rule for `/script.js and `/api/ingress` and then a block rule. Check that out and let me know if that ends up working for you!
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
api
authentication
bug
config
dependencies
docker
documentation
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
Improvement
Look Into
needs investigating
networking
new feature
non-critical bug
potential bug
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 question
reverse proxy
Security
stale
ui
wontfix
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
GiteaMirror ninjasurge
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/pangolin#103
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?