github-starred/pangolin
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/fosrl/pangolin.git synced 2026-05-21 09:21:15 -05:00
Code Issues 856 Packages Projects Releases 74 Wiki Activity

[GH-ISSUE #423] Feature Request: Raw TCP/UDP Ressource with Port Range #10204

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-05-06 13:19:33 -05:00 by GiteaMirror · 4 comments
GiteaMirror commented 2026-05-06 13:19:33 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @devZer0 on GitHub (Mar 29, 2025).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/fosrl/pangolin/issues/423

Hello,

it would be useful if we would be able to have a tcp/udp port range being forwarded instead of single port only

There are quite some apps out there which need a port range instead of single port

regards

Originally created by @devZer0 on GitHub (Mar 29, 2025). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/fosrl/pangolin/issues/423 Hello, it would be useful if we would be able to have a tcp/udp port range being forwarded instead of single port only There are quite some apps out there which need a port range instead of single port regards
GiteaMirror commented 2026-05-06 13:19:34 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@heribertmsb commented on GitHub (Mar 29, 2025):

This would be very helpfull

<!-- gh-comment-id:2763328929 --> @heribertmsb commented on GitHub (Mar 29, 2025): This would be very helpfull
GiteaMirror commented 2026-05-06 13:19:34 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@devZer0 commented on GitHub (Mar 29, 2025):

i think this could be hard to do, as we would need to have traefik have this feature first, correct ? unfortunately, the appropriate feature request for that has been closed by a bot.

https://github.com/traefik/traefik/issues/1677

<!-- gh-comment-id:2763340510 --> @devZer0 commented on GitHub (Mar 29, 2025): i think this could be hard to do, as we would need to have traefik have this feature first, correct ? unfortunately, the appropriate feature request for that has been closed by a bot. https://github.com/traefik/traefik/issues/1677
GiteaMirror commented 2026-05-06 13:19:34 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@hhftechnology commented on GitHub (Mar 29, 2025):

Seeing the current situation of traefik, it is almost impossible to implement this feature.

<!-- gh-comment-id:2763849481 --> @hhftechnology commented on GitHub (Mar 29, 2025): Seeing the current situation of traefik, it is almost impossible to implement this feature.
GiteaMirror commented 2026-05-06 13:19:35 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@oschwartz10612 commented on GitHub (Mar 30, 2025):

Thanks for the request! This is a duplicate of #63.

<!-- gh-comment-id:2764593275 --> @oschwartz10612 commented on GitHub (Mar 30, 2025): Thanks for the request! This is a duplicate of #63.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
api
authentication
bug
config
dependencies
docker
documentation
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
Improvement
Look Into
needs investigating
networking
new feature
non-critical bug
potential bug
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 question
reverse proxy
Security
stale
ui
wontfix
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
GiteaMirror ninjasurge
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/pangolin#10204
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?