Anonymized private activity #4569

New Issue

GiteaMirror · 2025-11-02T05:54:55-06:00

GiteaMirror commented

2025-11-02 05:54:55 -06:00

Originally created by @make-github-pseudonymous-again on GitHub (Dec 30, 2019).

This is a feature request.

Feature: to be able to publicize activity on private repositories in a way that does not reveal information on what is being worked on. For example by adding this activity to the activity graph. Currently only public activity is shown on the activity graph.

Similar to this github feature: https://help.github.com/en/github/setting-up-and-managing-your-github-profile/publicizing-or-hiding-your-private-contributions-on-your-profile#changing-the-visibility-of-your-private-contributions

Originally created by @make-github-pseudonymous-again on GitHub (Dec 30, 2019). This is a feature request. Feature: to be able to publicize activity on private repositories in a way that does not reveal information on what is being worked on. For example by adding this activity to the activity graph. Currently only public activity is shown on the activity graph. Similar to this github feature: https://help.github.com/en/github/setting-up-and-managing-your-github-profile/publicizing-or-hiding-your-private-contributions-on-your-profile#changing-the-visibility-of-your-private-contributions

GiteaMirror added the type/proposal label 2025-11-02 05:54:55 -06:00

GiteaMirror commented

2025-11-02 05:54:56 -06:00

@make-github-pseudonymous-again commented on GitHub (Dec 30, 2019):

Maybe duplicate of #9447?

Related to #6, #2349, #7392.

@make-github-pseudonymous-again commented on GitHub (Dec 30, 2019): Maybe duplicate of #9447? Related to #6, #2349, #7392.

GiteaMirror commented

2025-11-02 05:54:56 -06:00

@bagasme commented on GitHub (Dec 31, 2019):

@aureooms redacting activity?

@bagasme commented on GitHub (Dec 31, 2019): @aureooms redacting activity?

GiteaMirror commented

2025-11-02 05:54:56 -06:00

@make-github-pseudonymous-again commented on GitHub (Jan 16, 2020):

Maybe there is a misunderstanding (see #9447). Is activity in private repositories already supposed to be part of the activity graph already? Because I cannot see these activities on my instance.

@make-github-pseudonymous-again commented on GitHub (Jan 16, 2020): Maybe there is a misunderstanding (see #9447). Is activity in private repositories already supposed to be part of the activity graph already? Because I cannot see these activities on my instance.

GiteaMirror commented

2025-11-02 05:54:56 -06:00

@davidak commented on GitHub (Oct 4, 2021):

This is indeed still an issue.

Steps to reproduce:

create private test repo, initialize with README
see activity on https://try.gitea.io/davidak?tab=activity

open same page in incognito mode and you don't see the activity

Gitea Version: 1.16.0+dev-315-g89ddbe969

@davidak commented on GitHub (Oct 4, 2021): This is indeed still an issue. Steps to reproduce: 1. create private test repo, initialize with README 2. see activity on https://try.gitea.io/davidak?tab=activity ![Screenshot from 2021-10-04 17-04-29](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/91113/135875738-13fc2c9c-5df5-484c-8363-a07ed1af0299.png) 3. open same page in incognito mode and you don't see the activity ![Screenshot from 2021-10-04 17-04-39](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/91113/135875758-ad2e23c6-e04f-44ce-94b0-a0ed5b38e61d.png) Gitea Version: 1.16.0+dev-315-g89ddbe969

GiteaMirror referenced this issue

2025-11-02 13:32:02 -06:00

[PR #4675] [MERGED] Fix markdown image with link #17459

Sign in to join this conversation.

Branches Tags

1 Participants

Notifications

Due Date

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/gitea#4569