Webhooks implementation #1012

Closed
opened 2025-11-02 03:45:12 -06:00 by GiteaMirror · 14 comments
Owner

Originally created by @lunny on GitHub (Aug 29, 2017).

This is a summary issue for all the requirement related with webhooks

  • Push, PR open/close/reopen/edited/assigned/unassigned/label updated/label cleared/synchronized, Branch/Tag created
  • Webhooks for repo creation/deletion PR(#1663)
  • Webhooks for issues Issue(#132) PR(#3929 )
  • Pull request webhook should support all PR-related events Issue(#895)
  • PUSH event hooks not sent for branch removal Issue(#2105)
  • Webhook delivery test unavailable for organisations Issue(#2219)
Originally created by @lunny on GitHub (Aug 29, 2017). This is a summary issue for all the requirement related with webhooks - [x] Push, PR open/close/reopen/edited/assigned/unassigned/label updated/label cleared/synchronized, Branch/Tag created - [x] Webhooks for repo creation/deletion PR(#1663) - [x] Webhooks for issues Issue(#132) PR(#3929 ) - [x] Pull request webhook should support all PR-related events Issue(#895) - [x] PUSH event hooks not sent for branch removal Issue(#2105) - [ ] ~Webhook delivery test unavailable for organisations Issue(#2219)~
GiteaMirror added the type/featuretype/proposal labels 2025-11-02 03:45:12 -06:00
Author
Owner

@lcges commented on GitHub (Aug 31, 2017):

@lunny How is progress on this task?

@lcges commented on GitHub (Aug 31, 2017): @lunny How is progress on this task?
Author
Owner

@lunny commented on GitHub (Sep 1, 2017):

@qdbdbp I have updated the issue content. Did this answered your question?

@lunny commented on GitHub (Sep 1, 2017): @qdbdbp I have updated the issue content. Did this answered your question?
Author
Owner

@lcges commented on GitHub (Sep 1, 2017):

ok.
Do you think all webhooks are coming in to release 1.3?

@lcges commented on GitHub (Sep 1, 2017): ok. Do you think all webhooks are coming in to release 1.3?
Author
Owner

@lunny commented on GitHub (Sep 1, 2017):

I wish that.

@lunny commented on GitHub (Sep 1, 2017): I wish that.
Author
Owner

@daviian commented on GitHub (Sep 21, 2017):

@lunny PUSH event hooks not sent for branch removal Issue #2105 is done

@daviian commented on GitHub (Sep 21, 2017): @lunny PUSH event hooks not sent for branch removal Issue #2105 is done
Author
Owner

@lunny commented on GitHub (Sep 22, 2017):

@daviian done.

@lunny commented on GitHub (Sep 22, 2017): @daviian done.
Author
Owner

@hellasteph commented on GitHub (Oct 21, 2017):

Does this issue accept bounty? I would like to support for someone to complete this. ;)

@hellasteph commented on GitHub (Oct 21, 2017): Does this issue accept bounty? I would like to support for someone to complete this. ;)
Author
Owner

@lunny commented on GitHub (Oct 21, 2017):

@hellasteph This is a summary issue, so I think no one people will work on all these issues. It's not suitable for bounty I think.

@lunny commented on GitHub (Oct 21, 2017): @hellasteph This is a summary issue, so I think no one people will work on all these issues. It's not suitable for bounty I think.
Author
Owner

@hellasteph commented on GitHub (Oct 21, 2017):

Thanks for clarification, @lunny. I’ll read through your summary and find the issue that best fits what I was hoping to have happen. Thank you!

@hellasteph commented on GitHub (Oct 21, 2017): Thanks for clarification, @lunny. I’ll read through your summary and find the issue that best fits what I was hoping to have happen. Thank you!
Author
Owner

@Ceda-EI commented on GitHub (Mar 21, 2018):

The PR (#908) regarding Issue webhooks has been closed. What is the status on that now?

@Ceda-EI commented on GitHub (Mar 21, 2018): The PR (#908) regarding Issue webhooks has been closed. What is the status on that now?
Author
Owner

@lunny commented on GitHub (Mar 21, 2018):

@thehowl

@lunny commented on GitHub (Mar 21, 2018): @thehowl
Author
Owner

@thehowl commented on GitHub (Mar 21, 2018):

Needs to be re-made on the current codebase (& reviewed and merged). It's sort of dangling in my head, I may get around to it eventually, but the code is roughly the one of my PR, although it definitely needs to be changed to suit the way webhook code is currently written.

@thehowl commented on GitHub (Mar 21, 2018): Needs to be re-made on the current codebase (& reviewed and merged). It's sort of dangling in my head, I may get around to it eventually, but the code is _roughly_ the one of my PR, although it definitely needs to be changed to suit the way webhook code is currently written.
Author
Owner

@lunny commented on GitHub (May 21, 2018):

image

@lunny commented on GitHub (May 21, 2018): ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/81045/40287998-c3b7bd7e-5ce3-11e8-8809-d89a100563c8.png)
Author
Owner

@lunny commented on GitHub (Jun 5, 2018):

Only #2219 left on this issue and I removed it since it's not a blocking issue.

@lunny commented on GitHub (Jun 5, 2018): Only #2219 left on this issue and I removed it since it's not a blocking issue.
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/gitea#1012