docs: mark Challengers by ordering, not description text

A 2026-08-15 grilling round replaced the Challenger marking
convention: within a Use Case, Obvious Choices are listed first
(alphabetically), then Challengers (alphabetically), with no marker
in the entry text. Update the Challenger definition in CONTEXT.md.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Vinta Chen
2026-08-15 13:43:21 +08:00
co-authored by Claude
parent c413b8f1f6
commit 663fad0baf
+1 -1
View File
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ The only admission path into a full Use Case: the PR names the entry it replaces
_Avoid_: One-in-one-out (informal alias)
**Challenger**:
An entry (at most two per Use Case) that is not yet the Obvious Choice but is a credible successor to one. Its description must say so, and admission requires adoption-trajectory evidence, not popularity alone.
An entry (at most two per Use Case) that is not yet the Obvious Choice but is a credible successor to one. Marked by ordering, not description: within a Use Case, Obvious Choices are listed first (alphabetically), then Challengers (alphabetically). Admission requires adoption-trajectory evidence, not popularity alone.
_Avoid_: Rising Star (old lane name), Hidden Gem (old lane name — concept removed entirely)
**Split**: