github-starred/actual
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/actualbudget/actual.git synced 2026-05-05 22:52:20 -05:00
Code Issues 1.5k Packages Projects Releases 54 Wiki Activity

[GH-ISSUE #2969] [Feature] Option to hide reconciled transactions using the mobile interface. #26981

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-04-18 03:23:36 -05:00 by GiteaMirror · 2 comments
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-18 03:23:36 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @ARS-CS on GitHub (Jul 3, 2024).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/issues/2969

Verified feature request does not already exist?

  • I have searched and found no existing issue

💻

  • Would you like to implement this feature?

Pitch: what problem are you trying to solve?

I think it would be more efficient to deal only with transactions that have not been reconciled. This approach reduces friction when using the mobile app, as it allows users to ignore the clutter of transactions that are already processed correctly. Ideally, I would like to have filtering options in general, but just having a toggle to hide reconciled transactions would be great.

Describe your ideal solution to this problem

A simple toggle in a menu at the top would suffice.

Teaching and learning

I believe this feature would require minimal explanation. It should be immediately intuitive for individuals familiar with similar apps. For those who are not, a brief mention in the section discussing transactions should suffice.

Originally created by @ARS-CS on GitHub (Jul 3, 2024). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/issues/2969 ### Verified feature request does not already exist? - [X] I have searched and found no existing issue ### 💻 - [ ] Would you like to implement this feature? ### Pitch: what problem are you trying to solve? I think it would be more efficient to deal only with transactions that have not been reconciled. This approach reduces friction when using the mobile app, as it allows users to ignore the clutter of transactions that are already processed correctly. Ideally, I would like to have filtering options in general, but just having a toggle to hide reconciled transactions would be great. ### Describe your ideal solution to this problem A simple toggle in a menu at the top would suffice. ### Teaching and learning I believe this feature would require minimal explanation. It should be immediately intuitive for individuals familiar with similar apps. For those who are not, a brief mention in the section discussing transactions should suffice.
GiteaMirror added the feature label 2026-04-18 03:23:36 -05:00
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-18 03:23:37 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Jul 3, 2024):

✨ Thanks for sharing your idea! ✨

This repository uses lodash style issue management for enhancements. That means enhancement issues are automatically closed. This doesn’t mean we don’t accept feature requests, though! We will consider implementing ones that receive many upvotes, and we welcome contributions for any feature requests marked as needing votes (just post a comment first so we can help you make a successful contribution).

The enhancement backlog can be found here: https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/issues?q=label%3A%22needs+votes%22+sort%3Areactions-%2B1-desc+

Don’t forget to upvote the top comment with 👍!

<!-- gh-comment-id:2204782847 --> @github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Jul 3, 2024): :sparkles: Thanks for sharing your idea! :sparkles: This repository uses lodash style issue management for enhancements. That means enhancement issues are automatically closed. This doesn’t mean we don’t accept feature requests, though! We will consider implementing ones that receive many upvotes, and we welcome contributions for any feature requests marked as needing votes (just post a comment first so we can help you make a successful contribution). The enhancement backlog can be found here: https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/issues?q=label%3A%22needs+votes%22+sort%3Areactions-%2B1-desc+ Don’t forget to upvote the top comment with 👍! <!-- feature-auto-close-comment -->
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-18 03:23:38 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Feb 13, 2026):

🎉 This feature has been implemented in #6896 and will be released in the next version. Thanks for sharing your idea! 🎉

<!-- gh-comment-id:3898498125 --> @github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Feb 13, 2026): :tada: This feature has been implemented in #6896 and will be released in the next version. Thanks for sharing your idea! :tada: <!-- feature-implemented-comment -->
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
AI generated
API
bank sync
budgeting
bug
can’t replicate
dependencies
docker
documentation
electron
experimental feature
feature
feedback
goal templates
good first issue
help wanted
importers
maintenance
needs info
needs testing
needs triage
needs votes
openid
payees
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 regression
reports
responsive
rules
schedules
server
✨ merged
split transactions
tech debt
theme
transaction import
transaction reconciliation
transactions
translations
upstream
user interface
✅ approved
wontfix
No Label feature
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
GiteaMirror ninjasurge
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/actual#26981
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?