github-starred/actual
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/actualbudget/actual.git synced 2026-05-06 07:01:45 -05:00
Code Issues 1.5k Packages Projects Releases 54 Wiki Activity

[GH-ISSUE #5840] [Bug]: Transaction view - quick search with "?" finds everything #16750

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-04-14 19:45:21 -05:00 by GiteaMirror · 4 comments
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-14 19:45:21 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @Kyrodan on GitHub (Oct 2, 2025).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/issues/5840

Verified issue does not already exist?

  • I have searched and found no existing issue

What happened?

I have several transactions, in one of them I use the question mark in note field.
If I now filter in quick search with "?"

Outcome:
All transactions get displayed.

Expected outcome:
Just show transactions with a question mark in note field.

It seems, the question mark is a "query wildcard" character and is not escaped correctly.

How can we reproduce the issue?

see above.

Where are you hosting Actual?

Docker

What browsers are you seeing the problem on?

Firefox

Operating System

Windows 11

Originally created by @Kyrodan on GitHub (Oct 2, 2025). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/issues/5840 ### Verified issue does not already exist? - [x] I have searched and found no existing issue ### What happened? I have several transactions, in *one* of them I use the question mark in note field. If I now filter in quick search with "?" Outcome: *All* transactions get displayed. Expected outcome: Just show transactions with a question mark in note field. It seems, the question mark is a "query wildcard" character and is not escaped correctly. ### How can we reproduce the issue? see above. ### Where are you hosting Actual? Docker ### What browsers are you seeing the problem on? Firefox ### Operating System Windows 11
GiteaMirror added the transactionsgood first issueuser interfacebug labels 2026-04-14 19:45:21 -05:00
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-14 19:45:23 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@shantanugupta2004 commented on GitHub (Oct 3, 2025):

Hi , I have created a PR for the above issue. It passes all the CI tests except the mergefreeze. Please review it when you have a chance. Let me know if you have any questions or require any changes.
@Kyrodan @youngcw

<!-- gh-comment-id:3364955530 --> @shantanugupta2004 commented on GitHub (Oct 3, 2025): Hi , I have created a [PR](https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/pull/5845) for the above issue. It passes all the CI tests except the mergefreeze. Please review it when you have a chance. Let me know if you have any questions or require any changes. @Kyrodan @youngcw
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-14 19:45:23 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@eduardopio03 commented on GitHub (Mar 23, 2026):

Hi! I would like to take this issue. I've already been investigating the codebase and I have a working solution ready to submit. Can someone please assign it to me?

<!-- gh-comment-id:4113351611 --> @eduardopio03 commented on GitHub (Mar 23, 2026): Hi! I would like to take this issue. I've already been investigating the codebase and I have a working solution ready to submit. Can someone please assign it to me?
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-14 19:45:24 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jfdoming commented on GitHub (Mar 23, 2026):

Hi! I would like to take this issue. I've already been investigating the codebase and I have a working solution ready to submit. Can someone please assign it to me?

We don't assign issues, but feel free to open a PR

<!-- gh-comment-id:4113746124 --> @jfdoming commented on GitHub (Mar 23, 2026): > Hi! I would like to take this issue. I've already been investigating the codebase and I have a working solution ready to submit. Can someone please assign it to me? We don't assign issues, but feel free to open a PR
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-14 19:45:24 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@eduardopio03 commented on GitHub (Mar 24, 2026):

Hi! I already submitted a PR (#7270) that solves the problem. I hope someone could review the PR. Thank you all!

<!-- gh-comment-id:4118680272 --> @eduardopio03 commented on GitHub (Mar 24, 2026): Hi! I already submitted a PR (#7270) that solves the problem. I hope someone could review the PR. Thank you all!
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
AI generated
API
bank sync
budgeting
bug
can’t replicate
dependencies
docker
documentation
electron
experimental feature
feature
feedback
goal templates
good first issue
help wanted
importers
maintenance
needs info
needs testing
needs triage
needs votes
openid
payees
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 regression
reports
responsive
rules
schedules
server
✨ merged
split transactions
tech debt
theme
transaction import
transaction reconciliation
transactions
translations
upstream
user interface
✅ approved
wontfix
No Label bug good first issue transactions user interface
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
GiteaMirror ninjasurge
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/actual#16750
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?