[Feedback] Release Report Budget #1205

New Issue

Closed

opened 2026-02-28 19:35:56 -06:00 by GiteaMirror · 23 comments

GiteaMirror commented 2026-02-28 19:35:56 -06:00

Owner

Copy Link

Originally created by @youngcw on GitHub (Jul 7, 2024).

The Report Budget option needs just a few things before it can be released fully.

• A more permanent way to select budget type instead of the current budget page selector. Probably a setting in the settings page (#3017)
• Update the docs page and move it out of experimental actualbudget/docs#483
• Optional: A way to select this budget type when making a fresh budget. Could be coupled with an option to set the budget name. Related #1889
• Optional: Remove the rollover option since it makes the math really confusing in the report budget table. (this or the following but not both)
• Optional: Change how the rollover math works to make the table totals not super confusing. (this or the previous, but not both)
• Optional: Make hidden categories not count towards budget totals in Tracking Budget. Since this budget type essentially resets every month, it could be useful for people to be able have categories not apply towards the budget, but have a category to remove the red banner.
• Optional: rename the budget types. Report and Rollover are not especially descriptive. (Has been changed in the GUI to Envelope and Tracking. May need changed other places)
• Optional: Add function to migrate between the two

Originally created by @youngcw on GitHub (Jul 7, 2024). The Report Budget option needs just a few things before it can be released fully. - [x] A more permanent way to select budget type instead of the current budget page selector. Probably a setting in the settings page (#3017) - [x] Update the docs page and move it out of experimental actualbudget/docs#483 - [ ] Optional: A way to select this budget type when making a fresh budget. Could be coupled with an option to set the budget name. Related #1889 - [ ] Optional: Remove the rollover option since it makes the math really confusing in the report budget table. (this or the following but not both) - [ ] Optional: Change how the rollover math works to make the table totals not super confusing. (this or the previous, but not both) - [ ] Optional: Make hidden categories not count towards budget totals in Tracking Budget. Since this budget type essentially resets every month, it could be useful for people to be able have categories not apply towards the budget, but have a category to remove the red banner. - [x] Optional: rename the budget types. Report and Rollover are not especially descriptive. (Has been changed in the GUI to Envelope and Tracking. May need changed other places) - [ ] Optional: Add function to migrate between the two

GiteaMirror added the feedbackbudgetingtech debtexperimental feature labels 2026-02-28 19:35:56 -06:00

GiteaMirror closed this issue 2026-02-28 19:35:57 -06:00

GiteaMirror commented 2026-02-28 19:35:57 -06:00

Author

Owner

Copy Link

@Teprifer commented on GitHub (Jul 7, 2024):

To the last optional point on naming, not too fussed, but Traditional doesn't quite seen right, since while kinda true, it's also less descriptive and is suggestive it should be preferred. Could be 'Tracking' and 'Envelope'?

I also think the envelope should have (Default) or (Recommended) beside it when selecting type in keeping with Actual's history and being the primary budget type. It's also what actual is most known for (a YNAB alternate).

@Teprifer commented on GitHub (Jul 7, 2024): To the last optional point on naming, not too fussed, but Traditional doesn't quite seen right, since while kinda true, it's also less descriptive and is suggestive it should be preferred. Could be 'Tracking' and 'Envelope'? I also think the envelope should have (Default) or (Recommended) beside it when selecting type in keeping with Actual's history and being the primary budget type. It's also what actual is most known for (a YNAB alternate).

GiteaMirror commented 2026-02-28 19:35:58 -06:00

Author

Owner

Copy Link

@jsehnoutka commented on GitHub (Jul 7, 2024):

Not sure if Budget types are meant to be interlinked, I've always used them as complementary to each other. But if yes, I would suggest looking into #732. Maybe a dropdown menu of the Report budget could be extended with "Synchronize budgets" button?

@jsehnoutka commented on GitHub (Jul 7, 2024): Not sure if Budget types are meant to be interlinked, I've always used them as complementary to each other. But if yes, I would suggest looking into #732. Maybe a dropdown menu of the Report budget could be extended with "Synchronize budgets" button?

GiteaMirror commented 2026-02-28 19:35:58 -06:00

Author

Owner

Copy Link

@MatissJanis commented on GitHub (Jul 9, 2024):

A way to select this budget type when making a fresh budget. Could be coupled with an option to set the budget name.

TBH I think we shouldn't do this. We should be removing steps from the onboarding flow, not adding more.

@MatissJanis commented on GitHub (Jul 9, 2024): > A way to select this budget type when making a fresh budget. Could be coupled with an option to set the budget name. TBH I think we shouldn't do this. We should be removing steps from the onboarding flow, not adding more.

GiteaMirror commented 2026-02-28 19:35:58 -06:00

Author

Owner

Copy Link

@psybers commented on GitHub (Jul 11, 2024):

I'm not sure dropping the rollover capability is a good idea. I am not sure how other people are using this, but that is still needed for me for a few categories (that typically have yearly or bi-yearly charges). Otherwise you really can't budget for those without some sort of rollover.

@psybers commented on GitHub (Jul 11, 2024): I'm not sure dropping the rollover capability is a good idea. I am not sure how other people are using this, but that is still needed for me for a few categories (that typically have yearly or bi-yearly charges). Otherwise you really can't budget for those without some sort of rollover.

GiteaMirror commented 2026-02-28 19:35:58 -06:00

Author

Owner

Copy Link

@psybers commented on GitHub (Jul 11, 2024):

FYI I started work on having hidden categories not affect this budget. I have two bugs I am tracking down and then I will probably PR that.

@psybers commented on GitHub (Jul 11, 2024): FYI I started work on having hidden categories not affect this budget. I have two bugs I am tracking down and then I will probably PR that.

GiteaMirror commented 2026-02-28 19:35:59 -06:00

Author

Owner

Copy Link

@youngcw commented on GitHub (Jul 17, 2024):

A way to select this budget type when making a fresh budget. Could be coupled with an option to set the budget name.

TBH I think we shouldn't do this. We should be removing steps from the onboarding flow, not adding more.

I don't think a selector is needed, but I think people would like the option to set a name upon budget creation. If we do that, then its not a big deal to also add a type selector imo.

@youngcw commented on GitHub (Jul 17, 2024): > > A way to select this budget type when making a fresh budget. Could be coupled with an option to set the budget name. > > TBH I think we shouldn't do this. We should be removing steps from the onboarding flow, not adding more. I don't think a selector is needed, but I think people would like the option to set a name upon budget creation. If we do that, then its not a big deal to also add a type selector imo.

GiteaMirror commented 2026-02-28 19:35:59 -06:00

Author

Owner

Copy Link

@MatissJanis commented on GitHub (Jul 17, 2024):

I don't think a selector is needed, but I think people would like the option to set a name upon budget creation. If we do that, then its not a big deal to also add a type selector imo.

Is budget name critical to get started? I would argue - no, it's optional. The onboarding should have as little friction as possible in order to allow new users to try out the product without needing to fill out forms and/or make decisions that could be made at a later date. Just click "try now" -> import an existing budget -> boom, you're ready to try it out. Simple as that.

@MatissJanis commented on GitHub (Jul 17, 2024): > I don't think a selector is needed, but I think people would like the option to set a name upon budget creation. If we do that, then its not a big deal to also add a type selector imo. Is budget name critical to get started? I would argue - no, it's optional. The onboarding should have as little friction as possible in order to allow new users to try out the product without needing to fill out forms and/or make decisions that could be made at a later date. Just click "try now" -> import an existing budget -> boom, you're ready to try it out. Simple as that.

GiteaMirror commented 2026-02-28 19:35:59 -06:00

Author

Owner

Copy Link

@youngcw commented on GitHub (Jul 26, 2024):

I'm not sure dropping the rollover capability is a good idea. I am not sure how other people are using this, but that is still needed for me for a few categories (that typically have yearly or bi-yearly charges). Otherwise you really can't budget for those without some sort of rollover.

The only reason I would like to drop the ability is that the math for the budget totals gets weird. So if that could be made less weird, or the docs updated to make understanding those numbers easier, that would be fine with me.

@youngcw commented on GitHub (Jul 26, 2024): > I'm not sure dropping the rollover capability is a good idea. I am not sure how other people are using this, but that is still needed for me for a few categories (that typically have yearly or bi-yearly charges). Otherwise you really can't budget for those without some sort of rollover. The only reason I would like to drop the ability is that the math for the budget totals gets weird. So if that could be made less weird, or the docs updated to make understanding those numbers easier, that would be fine with me.

GiteaMirror commented 2026-02-28 19:36:00 -06:00

Author

Owner

Copy Link

@MatissJanis commented on GitHub (Sep 2, 2024):

Feedback: https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/issues/3346

@MatissJanis commented on GitHub (Sep 2, 2024): Feedback: https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/issues/3346

GiteaMirror commented 2026-02-28 19:36:00 -06:00

Author

Owner

Copy Link

@57194 commented on GitHub (Sep 30, 2024):

I was wondering the state of the "tracking budgeting" feature. Is it safe to start using it today, or should I expect significant changes to it (changes that could wipe all my data) and not bother using it yet?

I know it's in the "experimental" settings section, but I don't see any huge complaints from folks other than naming and some slight confusion on some of the displayed information.

Thanks.

---

Edit: I don't use Discord (and don't plan on it), so apologies for bringing discussion-type questions here, rather than feedback.

@57194 commented on GitHub (Sep 30, 2024): I was wondering the state of the "tracking budgeting" feature. Is it safe to start using it today, or should I expect significant changes to it (changes that could wipe all my data) and not bother using it yet? I know it's in the "experimental" settings section, but I don't see any huge complaints from folks other than naming and some slight confusion on some of the displayed information. Thanks. --- Edit: I don't use Discord (and don't plan on it), so apologies for bringing discussion-type questions here, rather than feedback.

GiteaMirror commented 2026-02-28 19:36:00 -06:00

Author

Owner

Copy Link

@psybers commented on GitHub (Sep 30, 2024):

@57194 I have been using it for a year and it is quite stable. You shouldn't lose data.

I would say it is pretty close to moving out of experimental. I personally would like to see hidden categories not affect the tracking budget, but other than that I see no problems with it in its current form.

@psybers commented on GitHub (Sep 30, 2024): @57194 I have been using it for a year and it is quite stable. You shouldn't lose data. I would say it is pretty close to moving out of experimental. I personally would like to see hidden categories not affect the tracking budget, but other than that I see no problems with it in its current form.

GiteaMirror commented 2026-02-28 19:36:00 -06:00

Author

Owner

Copy Link

@57194 commented on GitHub (Sep 30, 2024):

Thanks for the quick answer, @psybers! That seems to answer what I was wondering. If it was still very early stages with sweeping changes planned, then I wasn't gonna bother using Actual yet; but if the core stuff is worked out and there shouldn't be any data-destroying changes, then I'll probably finally give Actual an honest try! :-)

@57194 commented on GitHub (Sep 30, 2024): Thanks for the quick answer, @psybers! That seems to answer what I was wondering. If it was still very early stages with sweeping changes planned, then I wasn't gonna bother using Actual yet; but if the core stuff is worked out and there shouldn't be any data-destroying changes, then I'll probably finally give Actual an honest try! :-)

GiteaMirror commented 2026-02-28 19:36:00 -06:00

Author

Owner

Copy Link

@joel-rich commented on GitHub (Oct 7, 2024):

Hey everyone, I have a suggestion/request for this item:

Optional: Make hidden categories not count towards budget totals in Tracking Budget. Since this budget type essentially resets every month, it could be useful for people to be able have categories not apply towards the budget, but have a category to remove the red banner.

I understand if this adds too much complexity, but would it be feasible to have a separate "don't count this" tag for a category rather than not counting every hidden category? That would solve a couple issues with the way I'd like to use tracking budgeting.

• I have some categories that are hidden because they're not relevant anymore, but I still want them properly counted historically (ie: I have hidden my "Pets" category since I no longer have a pet, but it should still be included in calculations if I look back at previous year's budgets).
• I would like to have a category show in the budget page, but not count towards calculation - I have a "Savings" category which is the amount I've transferred to an off-budget account that I want to visibly see, but it doesn't make sense to have it count against the "monthly saved" calculation.

Thanks for your consideration.

As an aside, I've very excited to switch to this budget type - I've essentially been using Actual in this way for a couple years by using a "Projected Income" budget line with negative amounts budgeted for future months, but it has been a bit clunky at times.

@joel-rich commented on GitHub (Oct 7, 2024): Hey everyone, I have a suggestion/request for this item: > Optional: Make hidden categories not count towards budget totals in Tracking Budget. Since this budget type essentially resets every month, it could be useful for people to be able have categories not apply towards the budget, but have a category to remove the red banner. I understand if this adds too much complexity, but would it be feasible to have a separate "don't count this" tag for a category rather than not counting every hidden category? That would solve a couple issues with the way I'd like to use tracking budgeting. - I have some categories that are hidden because they're not relevant anymore, but I still want them properly counted historically (ie: I have hidden my "Pets" category since I no longer have a pet, but it should still be included in calculations if I look back at previous year's budgets). - I would like to have a category show in the budget page, but not count towards calculation - I have a "Savings" category which is the amount I've transferred to an off-budget account that I want to visibly see, but it doesn't make sense to have it count against the "monthly saved" calculation. Thanks for your consideration. As an aside, I've very excited to switch to this budget type - I've essentially been using Actual in this way for a couple years by using a "Projected Income" budget line with negative amounts budgeted for future months, but it has been a bit clunky at times.

GiteaMirror commented 2026-02-28 19:36:01 -06:00

Author

Owner

Copy Link

@psybers commented on GitHub (Oct 7, 2024):

I wonder what the purpose of 'hidden' categories is for an envelope budget? Is that really just acting more like an 'archived' category? Maybe that feature should be renamed to 'archived'? And then for tracking budgets, a new feature added called 'hidden' that hides it from the budget (but it is not archived/hidden in the UI)?

@psybers commented on GitHub (Oct 7, 2024): I wonder what the purpose of 'hidden' categories is for an envelope budget? Is that really just acting more like an 'archived' category? Maybe that feature should be renamed to 'archived'? And then for tracking budgets, a new feature added called 'hidden' that hides it from the budget (but it is not archived/hidden in the UI)?

GiteaMirror commented 2026-02-28 19:36:01 -06:00

Author

Owner

Copy Link

@AWare commented on GitHub (Oct 12, 2024):

I really prefer this budget type so 🥇

For hidden transactions, I just use this as a way to archive no longer relevant budgets. Such as if I need to budget for some specific thing, I can just hide that budget when it's over.

For rolled over budgets, this is useful for tracking spend that's going to be repaid- like work budgets or healthcare cash plans.

@AWare commented on GitHub (Oct 12, 2024): I really prefer this budget type so 🥇 For hidden transactions, I just use this as a way to archive no longer relevant budgets. Such as if I need to budget for some specific thing, I can just hide that budget when it's over. For rolled over budgets, this is useful for tracking spend that's going to be repaid- like work budgets or healthcare cash plans.

GiteaMirror commented 2026-02-28 19:36:01 -06:00

Author

Owner

Copy Link

@joel-rich commented on GitHub (Oct 15, 2024):

I wonder what the purpose of 'hidden' categories is for an envelope budget? Is that really just acting more like an 'archived' category? Maybe that feature should be renamed to 'archived'? And then for tracking budgets, a new feature added called 'hidden' that hides it from the budget (but it is not archived/hidden in the UI)?

I think calling the new tag "Tracked" or something similar would make more sense. To me, "Hidden" implies visually hidden and I'd be confused if I clicked a "Hide" button and only a total at the top of the page changed. Could have the category dropdown show "Rename / (Hide | Show or Archive | Unarchive(?)) / (Untrack | Track) / Delete"

@joel-rich commented on GitHub (Oct 15, 2024): > I wonder what the purpose of 'hidden' categories is for an envelope budget? Is that really just acting more like an 'archived' category? Maybe that feature should be renamed to 'archived'? And then for tracking budgets, a new feature added called 'hidden' that hides it from the budget (but it is not archived/hidden in the UI)? I think calling the new tag "Tracked" or something similar would make more sense. To me, "Hidden" implies visually hidden and I'd be confused if I clicked a "Hide" button and only a total at the top of the page changed. Could have the category dropdown show "Rename / (Hide | Show or Archive | Unarchive(?)) / (Untrack | Track) / Delete"

GiteaMirror commented 2026-02-28 19:36:02 -06:00

Author

Owner

Copy Link

@joel-rich commented on GitHub (Oct 23, 2024):

Has anyone had issues with this budget not filling in budgeted amounts? It seems fine if everything stays local, but doesn't seem to sync between devices properly and amounts also don't show after an export/import.

I tried digging through the code a bit last night, but I'm not at all familiar with react or the sheets/query/caching system going on so I didn't make much progress.

@joel-rich commented on GitHub (Oct 23, 2024): Has anyone had issues with this budget not filling in budgeted amounts? It seems fine if everything stays local, but doesn't seem to sync between devices properly and amounts also don't show after an export/import. I tried digging through the code a bit last night, but I'm not at all familiar with react or the sheets/query/caching system going on so I didn't make much progress.

GiteaMirror commented 2026-02-28 19:36:02 -06:00

Author

Owner

Copy Link

@youngcw commented on GitHub (Oct 23, 2024):

Has anyone had issues with this budget not filling in budgeted amounts? It seems fine if everything stays local, but doesn't seem to sync between devices properly and amounts also don't show after an export/import.

@joel-rich Does it still do it if you test on edge.actualbudget.org?

@youngcw commented on GitHub (Oct 23, 2024): > Has anyone had issues with this budget not filling in budgeted amounts? It seems fine if everything stays local, but doesn't seem to sync between devices properly and amounts also don't show after an export/import. @joel-rich Does it still do it if you test on edge.actualbudget.org?

GiteaMirror commented 2026-02-28 19:36:03 -06:00

Author

Owner

Copy Link

@joel-rich commented on GitHub (Oct 23, 2024):

@youngcw That build seems fine. Old exports still have nothing filled, but it's good if I fill the budget on edge and export then import again.

Edge is latest daily master so it'll be good next release?

@joel-rich commented on GitHub (Oct 23, 2024): @youngcw That build seems fine. Old exports still have nothing filled, but it's good if I fill the budget on edge and export then import again. Edge is latest daily master so it'll be good next release?

GiteaMirror commented 2026-02-28 19:36:03 -06:00

Author

Owner

Copy Link

@youngcw commented on GitHub (Oct 23, 2024):

@youngcw That build seems fine. Old exports still have nothing filled, but it's good if I fill the budget on edge and export then import again.

Edge is latest daily master so it'll be good next release?

Yes, everything in current edge will be in the next release.

@youngcw commented on GitHub (Oct 23, 2024): > @youngcw That build seems fine. Old exports still have nothing filled, but it's good if I fill the budget on edge and export then import again. > > Edge is latest daily master so it'll be good next release? Yes, everything in current edge will be in the next release.

GiteaMirror commented 2026-02-28 19:36:03 -06:00

Author

Owner

Copy Link

@youngcw commented on GitHub (Nov 4, 2024):

@MatissJanis I did the needed updates to the docs page. So this is minimally ready for release.

@youngcw commented on GitHub (Nov 4, 2024): @MatissJanis I did the needed updates to the docs page. So this is minimally ready for release.

GiteaMirror commented 2026-02-28 19:36:03 -06:00

Author

Owner

Copy Link

@velotelo commented on GitHub (Nov 11, 2024):

What's the proper way to plan a budget for N months ahead with tracked option? Although I can plan each month's expenses and incomes separately, I can't find a way to link the results of previous and next months together.

Say, I'm planning my next year's budget and start with 0€ in my account on January 1st. My "projected savings" in January are 1000€, so I expect to have 1000€ in my account on January 31st.
In February I plan spending more and my "projected savings" are -1000€, so end of February I should have 0€ in my account.
How should I transfer the projected result of January to February? Currently I just copy the "projected savings" into the "starting balances" of the following month. Is that the right approach?
But then end of each month I have to manually update those "starting balances" for future months. It would be nice if that could be handled automatically like in envelope budgeting.

P.S. The envelope option doesn't work for me, since there's no way to plan my budget for next N months if I'm not able to budget in my income as well.

@velotelo commented on GitHub (Nov 11, 2024): What's the proper way to plan a budget for N months ahead with tracked option? Although I can plan each month's expenses and incomes separately, I can't find a way to link the results of previous and next months together. Say, I'm planning my next year's budget and start with 0€ in my account on January 1st. My "projected savings" in January are 1000€, so I expect to have 1000€ in my account on January 31st. In February I plan spending more and my "projected savings" are -1000€, so end of February I should have 0€ in my account. How should I transfer the projected result of January to February? Currently I just copy the "projected savings" into the "starting balances" of the following month. Is that the right approach? But then end of each month I have to manually update those "starting balances" for future months. It would be nice if that could be handled automatically like in envelope budgeting. P.S. The envelope option doesn't work for me, since there's no way to plan my budget for next N months if I'm not able to budget in my income as well.

GiteaMirror commented 2026-02-28 19:36:04 -06:00

Author

Owner

Copy Link

@MatissJanis commented on GitHub (Nov 23, 2024):

Report (tracking) budget will be released as a first party feature in v24.12.0. If there are any further feedback items and/or bug reports - please open individual issues.

Thanks to everyone that collaborated on this!

@MatissJanis commented on GitHub (Nov 23, 2024): Report (tracking) budget will be released as a first party feature in v24.12.0. If there are any further feedback items and/or bug reports - please open individual issues. Thanks to everyone that collaborated on this!

GiteaMirror referenced this issue 2026-02-28 20:43:54 -06:00

[PR #1205] [MERGED] Display bundle size changes in comments on opened PRs #3590

Sign in to join this conversation.

No Branch/Tag Specified

Branches Tags

master

matiss/oxlint-no-floating-promises-require-array-sort-compare

ai/custom-theme-dual-prefs

claude/fix-simplefin-batch-sync-O8LcD

matiss/fix-6804

claude/fix-simplefin-ssrf-T31gX

claude/release-notes-validation-X7rvR

add-claude-github-actions-1772738270730

react-query-rules

react-query-useSchedules

matiss/separate-lint-format

dependabot/npm_and_yarn/ajv-6.14.0

cursor/sync-performance-notification-9899

react-query-prefs

matiss/chunked-sync-and-progress-ux

v26.2.1

copilot/sub-pr-6880

fix-react-query-clear-on-close-budget

copilot/sub-pr-6140

feat/auto-note

feat/scoped-bank-sync

cursor/desktop-transactions-react-table-1d0c

fix-exhaustive-deps-App

copilot/fix-find-replace-bug

release/v26.2.0-pre

matiss/browser-tests

mobile-fix-drag-and-drop-across-groups

budget-table-v2

PayeeAutocomplete2

pglite

bugfix/plugins/fix-plugins-sw

feat/plugins/plugins-core-package

prerelease

matiss/unicode-minus-fix

cursor/fix-actual-github-issue-6206-gemini-3-pro-preview-9c37

TransactionFormPage

cursor/implement-mortgage-and-loan-account-type-78ca

tests-update-fill-with-pressSequentially

mobile/link-modal

deps/25.11

cursor/fix-update-vrt-apply-ci-job-dispatch-b324

sync-server-plugins

cursor/propose-patch-for-github-issue-5680-2a18

fix/compiler-preserve-inner-dollar-escapes

cursor/analyze-actual-budget-issue-and-propose-fix-5b70

coderabbitai/docstrings/0c070e5

cursor/add-wip-prefix-and-comment-to-prs-d78d

jfdoming/08-21-auto-focus-on-navigate-in-all-browsers

show-totals-on-mobile-budget-banners

allow-child-transactions-make-transfer

mobile-calculator-keyboard

payee-geolocation

enhance/restore_scroll_position

dm-fix-second-click-on-mobile-new-transaction-2

scrollToLocationBudget

alert-autofix-38

tsconfig-composite

mobile-fix-uncategorized-transactions-on-tracking-budgets

server-budget-handlers

fix-sql-injection-in-cleanup-template

non-chrome-draggable-workaround

mobile-budget-page-swipe-navigation

ts-db-all

stable

dark-theme-with-brand-colors

fix-mobile-delete-group

ts-db-select

UnderKoen/reconcile-context-menu

master-before-server-merge

v25.2.1

ts-runQuery

rename-redux-hooks

UnderKoen/3557-persist-state-in-history

remove-redux-CLOSE_BUDGET

fix-exhaustive-deps-errors-FinancesApp

redux-toolkit-createSlice-backup

accounts-function-component

ts-useSplitsExpanded

loot-core-server-package

useTransactios-in-TransactionEdit

react-aria-input

move-redux-to-desktop-client

QueryState-type

fix-themes-applied-late

mobile-vrts

revert-3295-spendingCardFix

react-aria-button-4

split-payee-on-mobile

twk3/pin-apis-crdt

notes-tag-autocomplete

ts-LoadBackup

dnd-kit

package-upgrades

v26.3.0

v26.2.1

v26.2.0

v26.1.0

v25.12.0

v25.11.0

v25.10.0

v25.9.0

v25.8.0

v25.7.1

v25.7.0

v25.6.1

v25.6.0

v25.5.0

v25.4.0

v25.3.1

v25.3.0

v25.2.1

v25.2.0

v25.1.0

v24.12.0

v24.11.0

v24.10.1

v24.10.0

v24.9.0

v24.8.0

v24.7.0

v24.6.0

v24.5.0

v24.4.0

v24.3.0

v24.2.0

v24.1.0

v23.12.0

v23.11.0

v23.10.0

v23.9.0

v23.8.1

v23.8.0

v23.7.2

v23.7.1

v23.7.0

v23.6.0

v23.5.0

v23.4.2

v23.4.1

v23.4.0

v23.3.2

v23.3.0

v23.2.9

v23.2.5

v23.1.12

v22.12.9

Labels

Clear labels

AI generated

API

bank sync

budgeting

bug

can’t replicate

dependencies

docker

documentation

electron

experimental feature

feature

feedback

goal templates

good first issue

help wanted

importers

maintenance

needs info

needs testing

needs triage

needs votes

openid

payees

pull-request

Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request

regression

reports

responsive

rules

schedules

server

✨ merged

split transactions

tech debt

theme

transaction import

transaction reconciliation

transactions

translations

upstream

user interface

✅ approved

wontfix

No Label budgeting experimental feature feedback tech debt

Milestone

No items

No Milestone

Projects

Clear projects

No project

Assignees

Clear assignees

GiteaMirror ninjasurge

No Assignees

1 Participants

Notifications

Subscribe

Due Date

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/actual#1205