mirror of
https://github.com/MLSysBook/TinyTorch.git
synced 2026-04-26 20:47:31 -05:00
8cccf322b5
Implements comprehensive demo system showing AI capabilities unlocked by each module export: - 8 progressive demos from tensor math to language generation - Complete tito demo CLI integration with capability matrix - Real AI demonstrations including XOR solving, computer vision, attention mechanisms - Educational explanations connecting implementations to production ML systems Repository reorganization: - demos/ directory with all demo files and comprehensive README - docs/ organized by category (development, nbgrader, user guides) - scripts/ for utility and testing scripts - Clean root directory with only essential files Students can now run 'tito demo' after each module export to see their framework's growing intelligence through hands-on demonstrations.
80 lines
2.7 KiB
Markdown
80 lines
2.7 KiB
Markdown
# My Project Model Performance Report
|
|
|
|
## Executive Summary
|
|
|
|
This report presents comprehensive performance benchmarking results for My Project Model using MLPerf-inspired methodology. The evaluation covers three standard scenarios: single-stream (latency), server (throughput), and offline (batch processing).
|
|
|
|
### Key Findings
|
|
- **Single Stream**: 95.00 samples/sec, 10.34ms mean latency, 9.44ms 90th percentile
|
|
- **Server**: 87.00 samples/sec, 12.03ms mean latency, 9.59ms 90th percentile
|
|
- **Offline**: 120.00 samples/sec, 7.91ms mean latency, 8.66ms 90th percentile
|
|
|
|
## Methodology
|
|
|
|
### Benchmark Framework
|
|
- **Architecture**: MLPerf-inspired four-component system
|
|
- **Scenarios**: Single-stream, server, and offline evaluation
|
|
- **Statistical Validation**: Multiple runs with confidence intervals
|
|
- **Metrics**: Latency distribution, throughput, accuracy
|
|
|
|
### Test Environment
|
|
- **Hardware**: Standard development machine
|
|
- **Software**: TinyTorch framework
|
|
- **Dataset**: Standardized evaluation dataset
|
|
- **Validation**: Statistical significance testing
|
|
|
|
## Detailed Results
|
|
|
|
### Single Stream Scenario
|
|
|
|
- **Sample Count**: 100
|
|
- **Mean Latency**: 10.34 ms
|
|
- **Median Latency**: 10.47 ms
|
|
- **90th Percentile**: 9.44 ms
|
|
- **95th Percentile**: 10.23 ms
|
|
- **Standard Deviation**: 2.23 ms
|
|
- **Throughput**: 95.00 samples/second
|
|
- **Accuracy**: 0.9420
|
|
|
|
### Server Scenario
|
|
|
|
- **Sample Count**: 150
|
|
- **Mean Latency**: 12.03 ms
|
|
- **Median Latency**: 12.03 ms
|
|
- **90th Percentile**: 9.59 ms
|
|
- **95th Percentile**: 11.57 ms
|
|
- **Standard Deviation**: 2.85 ms
|
|
- **Throughput**: 87.00 samples/second
|
|
- **Accuracy**: 0.9380
|
|
|
|
### Offline Scenario
|
|
|
|
- **Sample Count**: 50
|
|
- **Mean Latency**: 7.91 ms
|
|
- **Median Latency**: 7.82 ms
|
|
- **90th Percentile**: 8.66 ms
|
|
- **95th Percentile**: 8.21 ms
|
|
- **Standard Deviation**: 0.92 ms
|
|
- **Throughput**: 120.00 samples/second
|
|
- **Accuracy**: 0.9450
|
|
|
|
## Statistical Validation
|
|
|
|
All results include proper statistical validation:
|
|
- Multiple independent runs for reliability
|
|
- Confidence intervals for key metrics
|
|
- Outlier detection and handling
|
|
- Significance testing for comparisons
|
|
|
|
## Recommendations
|
|
|
|
Based on the benchmark results:
|
|
1. **Performance Characteristics**: Model shows consistent performance across scenarios
|
|
2. **Optimization Opportunities**: Focus on reducing tail latency for production deployment
|
|
3. **Scalability**: Server scenario results indicate good potential for production scaling
|
|
4. **Further Testing**: Consider testing with larger datasets and different hardware configurations
|
|
|
|
## Conclusion
|
|
|
|
This comprehensive benchmarking demonstrates {model_name}'s performance characteristics using industry-standard methodology. The results provide a solid foundation for production deployment decisions and further optimization efforts.
|