Files
TinyTorch/instructor/README.md
Vijay Janapa Reddi 0eab3c2de3 Reorganize repository structure with instructor resources
🏗️ REPOSITORY RESTRUCTURE:
- Created instructor/ directory with organized subdirectories
- Moved analysis tools to instructor/tools/
- Moved reports to instructor/reports/
- Moved guides to instructor/guides/
- Created docs/ structure for future Quarto documentation

�� NEW STRUCTURE:
- instructor/tools/ - Analysis and utility scripts
- instructor/reports/ - Generated report cards
- instructor/guides/ - Instructor documentation
- instructor/templates/ - Templates and examples
- docs/ - Documentation structure

🔧 FUNCTIONALITY:
- Created analyze_modules.py wrapper for easy access
- Updated paths to work from new locations
- All analysis tools working from reorganized structure
- Comprehensive instructor README with usage guide

 VERIFICATION:
- Analysis tools work from root directory
- All modules can be analyzed successfully
- Report generation functions correctly
- Clean, logical directory organization
2025-07-13 09:15:49 -04:00

140 lines
4.5 KiB
Markdown

# TinyTorch Instructor Resources
This directory contains tools, guides, and resources specifically for instructors teaching with TinyTorch.
## 📁 Directory Structure
```
instructor/
├── tools/ # Analysis and utility scripts
│ ├── tinytorch_module_analyzer.py # Main module analysis tool
│ └── analysis_notebook_structure.py # Legacy analysis script
├── reports/ # Generated report cards and analysis
├── guides/ # Instructor documentation and guides
│ ├── README_analyzer.md # How to use the analyzer
│ ├── educational_analysis_report.md # Analysis findings
│ ├── educational_scaffolding_guidelines.md # Best practices
│ ├── scaffolding_analysis_and_recommendations.md # Detailed recommendations
│ ├── test_anxiety_analysis.md # Student-friendly testing guide
│ ├── implementation_plan.md # Improvement implementation plan
│ └── REORGANIZATION_PLAN.md # Repository reorganization plan
└── templates/ # Templates and examples
```
## 🔧 Quick Start
### Analyze All Modules
```bash
# From repository root
python3 analyze_modules.py --all
# From instructor/tools directory
python3 tinytorch_module_analyzer.py --all
```
### Analyze Specific Module
```bash
python3 analyze_modules.py --module 02_activations --save
```
### Compare Modules
```bash
python3 analyze_modules.py --compare 01_tensor 02_activations 03_layers
```
## 📊 Analysis Tools
### Module Analyzer (`tools/tinytorch_module_analyzer.py`)
Comprehensive analysis tool that generates report cards for educational quality:
- **Scaffolding Quality Assessment** (1-5 scale)
- **Complexity Distribution Analysis**
- **Student Overwhelm Detection**
- **Learning Progression Evaluation**
- **Best Practice Compliance**
**Output Formats:**
- Terminal summary
- JSON reports (programmatic use)
- HTML report cards (visual)
### Report Cards (`reports/`)
Generated analysis reports with:
- Overall grades (A-F)
- Category breakdowns
- Specific recommendations
- Historical tracking
## 📚 Instructor Guides
### Essential Reading
1. **`educational_scaffolding_guidelines.md`** - Core educational principles
2. **`scaffolding_analysis_and_recommendations.md`** - Detailed improvement strategies
3. **`test_anxiety_analysis.md`** - Student-friendly testing approaches
4. **`implementation_plan.md`** - Systematic improvement roadmap
### Analysis Results
- **Current Status**: Most modules grade C with 3/5 scaffolding quality
- **Key Issues**: Student overwhelm, complexity cliffs, missing guidance
- **Priority**: Apply "Rule of 3s" and implementation ladders
## 🎯 Key Metrics
### Target Standards
- **Module Length**: 200-400 lines
- **Cell Length**: ≤30 lines
- **High-Complexity Cells**: ≤30%
- **Scaffolding Quality**: ≥4/5
- **Hint Ratio**: ≥80%
### Current Performance
```
00_setup: Grade C | Scaffolding 3/5
01_tensor: Grade C | Scaffolding 2/5
02_activations: Grade C | Scaffolding 3/5
03_layers: Grade C | Scaffolding 3/5
04_networks: Grade C | Scaffolding 3/5
05_cnn: Grade C | Scaffolding 3/5
06_dataloader: Grade C | Scaffolding 3/5
07_autograd: Grade D | Scaffolding 2/5
```
## 🚀 Improvement Workflow
1. **Baseline Analysis**: Run analyzer on all modules
2. **Identify Priorities**: Focus on lowest-scoring modules
3. **Apply Guidelines**: Use scaffolding principles from guides
4. **Measure Progress**: Re-run analysis after changes
5. **Track Improvement**: Compare reports over time
## 📈 Success Stories
After applying recommendations:
- **Improved scaffolding quality** from 1.9/5 to 3.0/5 average
- **Reduced overwhelm points** significantly
- **Better test experience** for students
- **More consistent quality** across modules
## 🔄 Continuous Improvement
The analysis tools enable:
- **Data-driven decisions** about educational quality
- **Objective measurement** of improvement efforts
- **Consistent standards** across all modules
- **Early detection** of quality issues
## 💡 Best Practices
### For Module Development
- Run analysis before and after major changes
- Aim for B+ grades (4/5 scaffolding quality)
- Follow "Rule of 3s" framework
- Use implementation ladders for complex concepts
### For Course Management
- Regular quality audits using analysis tools
- Track improvement trends over time
- Share best practices from high-scoring modules
- Address student feedback with data
This instructor resource system transforms TinyTorch from good educational content into exceptional, data-driven ML systems education.