mirror of
https://github.com/MLSysBook/TinyTorch.git
synced 2026-05-28 12:35:51 -05:00
Removes test report file
Deletes the test report markdown file, as it is no longer needed.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,79 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# My Project Model Performance Report
|
||||
|
||||
## Executive Summary
|
||||
|
||||
This report presents comprehensive performance benchmarking results for My Project Model using MLPerf-inspired methodology. The evaluation covers three standard scenarios: single-stream (latency), server (throughput), and offline (batch processing).
|
||||
|
||||
### Key Findings
|
||||
- **Single Stream**: 95.00 samples/sec, 10.03ms mean latency, 11.58ms 90th percentile
|
||||
- **Server**: 87.00 samples/sec, 12.30ms mean latency, 18.20ms 90th percentile
|
||||
- **Offline**: 120.00 samples/sec, 7.77ms mean latency, 7.75ms 90th percentile
|
||||
|
||||
## Methodology
|
||||
|
||||
### Benchmark Framework
|
||||
- **Architecture**: MLPerf-inspired four-component system
|
||||
- **Scenarios**: Single-stream, server, and offline evaluation
|
||||
- **Statistical Validation**: Multiple runs with confidence intervals
|
||||
- **Metrics**: Latency distribution, throughput, accuracy
|
||||
|
||||
### Test Environment
|
||||
- **Hardware**: Standard development machine
|
||||
- **Software**: TinyTorch framework
|
||||
- **Dataset**: Standardized evaluation dataset
|
||||
- **Validation**: Statistical significance testing
|
||||
|
||||
## Detailed Results
|
||||
|
||||
### Single Stream Scenario
|
||||
|
||||
- **Sample Count**: 100
|
||||
- **Mean Latency**: 10.03 ms
|
||||
- **Median Latency**: 9.91 ms
|
||||
- **90th Percentile**: 11.58 ms
|
||||
- **95th Percentile**: 9.75 ms
|
||||
- **Standard Deviation**: 2.09 ms
|
||||
- **Throughput**: 95.00 samples/second
|
||||
- **Accuracy**: 0.9420
|
||||
|
||||
### Server Scenario
|
||||
|
||||
- **Sample Count**: 150
|
||||
- **Mean Latency**: 12.30 ms
|
||||
- **Median Latency**: 12.49 ms
|
||||
- **90th Percentile**: 18.20 ms
|
||||
- **95th Percentile**: 14.18 ms
|
||||
- **Standard Deviation**: 3.13 ms
|
||||
- **Throughput**: 87.00 samples/second
|
||||
- **Accuracy**: 0.9380
|
||||
|
||||
### Offline Scenario
|
||||
|
||||
- **Sample Count**: 50
|
||||
- **Mean Latency**: 7.77 ms
|
||||
- **Median Latency**: 7.70 ms
|
||||
- **90th Percentile**: 7.75 ms
|
||||
- **95th Percentile**: 9.10 ms
|
||||
- **Standard Deviation**: 1.10 ms
|
||||
- **Throughput**: 120.00 samples/second
|
||||
- **Accuracy**: 0.9450
|
||||
|
||||
## Statistical Validation
|
||||
|
||||
All results include proper statistical validation:
|
||||
- Multiple independent runs for reliability
|
||||
- Confidence intervals for key metrics
|
||||
- Outlier detection and handling
|
||||
- Significance testing for comparisons
|
||||
|
||||
## Recommendations
|
||||
|
||||
Based on the benchmark results:
|
||||
1. **Performance Characteristics**: Model shows consistent performance across scenarios
|
||||
2. **Optimization Opportunities**: Focus on reducing tail latency for production deployment
|
||||
3. **Scalability**: Server scenario results indicate good potential for production scaling
|
||||
4. **Further Testing**: Consider testing with larger datasets and different hardware configurations
|
||||
|
||||
## Conclusion
|
||||
|
||||
This comprehensive benchmarking demonstrates {model_name}'s performance characteristics using industry-standard methodology. The results provide a solid foundation for production deployment decisions and further optimization efforts.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user