For checks querying a named instance with "dnssec-accept-expired yes;"
set, authoritative responses have a TTL of 300 seconds. Assuming empty
resolver cache, TTLs of RRsets in the ANSWER section of the first
response to a given query will always match their authoritative
counterparts. Also note that for a DNSSEC-validating named resolver,
validated RRsets replace any existing non-validated RRsets with the same
owner name and type, e.g. cached from responses received while resolving
CD=1 queries. Since TTL capping happens before a validated RRset is
inserted into the cache and RRSIG expiry time does not impose an upper
TTL bound when "dnssec-accept-expired yes;" is set and, as pointed out
above, the original TTLs of the relevant RRsets equal 300 seconds, the
RRsets in the ANSWER section of the responses to expiring.example/SOA
and expired.example/SOA queries sent with CD=0 should always be exactly
120 seconds, never a lower value. Make the relevant TTL checks stricter
to reflect that.
(cherry picked from commit a85cc41486)
Always expecting a TTL of exactly 300 seconds for RRsets found in the
ADDITIONAL section of responses received for CD=1 queries sent during
TTL capping checks is too strict since these responses will contain
records cached from multiple DNS messages received during the resolution
process.
In responses to queries sent with CD=1, ns.expiring.example/A in the
ADDITIONAL section will come from a delegation returned by ns2 while the
ANSWER section will come from an authoritative answer returned by ns3.
If the queries to ns2 and ns3 happen at different Unix timestamps,
RRsets cached from the older response will have a different TTL by the
time they are returned to dig, triggering a false positive.
Allow a safety margin of 60 seconds for checks inspecting the ADDITIONAL
section of responses to queries sent with CD=1 to fix the issue. A
safety margin this large is likely overkill, but it is used nevertheless
for consistency with similar safety margins used in other TTL capping
checks.
(cherry picked from commit 8baf859063)
Changes introduced by commit 6b8e4d6e69
were incomplete as not all time-sensitive checks were updated to match
revised "nta-lifetime" and "nta-recheck" values. Prevent rare false
positives by updating all NTA-related checks so that they work reliably
with "nta-lifetime 12s;" and "nta-recheck 9s;". Update comments as well
to prevent confusion.
(cherry picked from commit 9a36a1bba3)
During "dlv" system test setup, the "sed" regex used for mangling the
DNSKEY RRset for the "druz" zone does not include the plus sign ("+"),
which may:
- cause the replacement to happen near the end of DNSKEY RDATA, which
can cause the latter to become an invalid Base64 string,
- prevent the replacement from being performed altogether.
Both cases prevent the "dlv" system test from behaving as intended and
may trigger false positives. Add the missing character to the
aforementioned regex to ensure the replacement is always performed on
bytes 10-25 of DNSKEY RDATA.
(cherry picked from commit fd13fef299)
Make delv honor the operating system's preferred ephemeral port range
instead of always using the default 1024-65535 range for outgoing
messages.
(cherry picked from commit ada6846a10)
Use them in structs for various rdata types where they are missing.
This doesn't change the structs since we are replacing explicit
uint8_t field types with aliases for uint8_t.
Use dns_dsdigest_t in library function arguments.
(cherry picked from commit 0f219714e1)
Alphabetize options and synopsis; remove spurious -z from synopsis;
refer to -T KEY in options that are only relevant to pre-RFC3755
DNSSEC, and add a -f KSK example.
(cherry picked from commit 1954f8d2bf)
Make nsupdate honor the operating system's preferred ephemeral port
range instead of always using the default 1024-65535 range for outgoing
messages.
(cherry picked from commit 06f582f23e)
The "check key refreshes are resumed after root servers become
available" check may trigger a false positive for the "mkeys" system
test if the second example/TXT query sent by dig is received by ns5 less
than a second after it receives a REFUSED response to the upstream query
it sends to ns1 in order to resolve the first example/TXT query sent by
dig. Since that REFUSED response from ns1 causes ns5 to return a
SERVFAIL answer to dig, example/TXT is added to the SERVFAIL cache,
which is enabled by default with a TTL of 1 second. This in turn may
cause ns5 to return a cached SERVFAIL response to the second example/TXT
query sent by dig, i.e. make ns5 not perform full query processing as
expected by the check.
Since the primary purpose of the check in question is to ensure that key
refreshes are resumed once initially unavailable root servers become
available, the optimal solution appears to be disabling SERVFAIL cache
for ns5 as doing that still allows the check to fulfill its purpose and
it is arguably more prudent than always sleeping for 1 second.
(cherry picked from commit 7c6bff3c4e)
For consistency between all system tests, add missing setup.sh scripts
for tests which do not have one yet and ensure every setup.sh script
calls its respective clean.sh script.
(cherry picked from commit e410803919)
Temporary files created by a given system test should be removed by its
clean.sh script, not its setup.sh script. Remove redundant "rm"
invocations from setup.sh scripts. Move required "rm" invocations from
setup.sh scripts to their corresponding clean.sh scripts.
(cherry picked from commit c64ed484c8)
Mark AndrewsandMichał Kępień
Tony FinchandMark Andrews
Evan Hunt
Curtis BlackburnandEvan Hunt
Matthijs Mekking