ComputerSurge/bind9
3
0
Fork 0
Code Pull Requests 1 Activity

6303: Locally Served DNS Zones

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Mark Andrews
2011-07-29 01:57:53 +00:00
parent 34065cf7d0
commit 9b97400166
2 changed files with 233 additions and 398 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
doc/rfc/index
View File

@@ -140,4 +140,4 @@
DNSKEY and RRSIG Resource Records for DNSSEC
5933: Use of GOST Signature Algorithms in DNSKEY
and RRSIG Resource Records for DNSSEC
6303: Locally Served DNS Zones

629
doc/draft/draft-ietf-dnsop-default-local-zones-10.txt → doc/rfc/rfc6303.txt
View File

@@ -1,62 +1,48 @@
Network Working Group M. Andrews
Internet-Draft ISC
Intended status: BCP March 25, 2010
Expires: September 26, 2010
Locally-served DNS Zones
draft-ietf-dnsop-default-local-zones-10
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) M. Andrews
Request for Comments: 6303 ISC
BCP: 163 July 2011
Category: Best Current Practice
ISSN: 2070-1721
Locally Served DNS Zones
Abstract
Experience with the Domain Name System (DNS) has shown that there are
a number of DNS zones all iterative resolvers and recursive
a number of DNS zones that all iterative resolvers and recursive
nameservers should automatically serve, unless configured otherwise.
RFC 4193 specifies that this should occur for D.F.IP6.ARPA. This
document extends the practice to cover the IN-ADDR.ARPA zones for RFC
1918 address space and other well known zones with similar
1918 address space and other well-known zones with similar
characteristics.
Status of this Memo
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted to IETF in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
This memo documents an Internet Best Current Practice.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
Drafts.
This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
(IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has
received public review and has been approved for publication by the
Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on
BCPs is available in Section 2 of RFC 5741.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
This Internet-Draft will expire on September 26, 2010.
Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6303.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2010 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
Copyright (c) 2011 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Andrews Expires September 26, 2010 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft Locally-served DNS Zones March 2010
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
@@ -64,7 +50,15 @@ Internet-Draft Locally-served DNS Zones March 2010
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the BSD License.
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Andrews Best Current Practice [Page 1]
RFC 6303 Locally Served DNS Zones July 2011
This document may contain material from IETF Documents or IETF
Contributions published or made publicly available before November
@@ -78,96 +72,26 @@ Internet-Draft Locally-served DNS Zones March 2010
it for publication as an RFC or to translate it into languages other
than English.
Andrews Expires September 26, 2010 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft Locally-served DNS Zones March 2010
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.1. Reserved Words . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. Effects on sites using RFC 1918 addresses. . . . . . . . . . . 4
3. Changes to Iterative Resolver Behaviour. . . . . . . . . . . . 4
4. Lists Of Zones Covered . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
4.1. RFC1918 Zones . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
4.2. RFC3330 and RFC5737 Zones . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
4.3. Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
4.4. IPv6 Locally Assigned Local Addresses . . . . . . . . . . 7
4.5. IPv6 Link Local Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
4.6. IPv6 Example Prefix . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
5. Zones that are Out-Of-Scope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
6. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
7. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
8. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
9. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
9.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
9.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Appendix A. Change History [To Be Removed on Publication] . . . . 10
A.1. draft-ietf-dnsop-default-local-zones-10.txt . . . . . . . 10
A.2. draft-ietf-dnsop-default-local-zones-09.txt . . . . . . . 10
A.3. draft-ietf-dnsop-default-local-zones-08.txt . . . . . . . 11
A.4. draft-ietf-dnsop-default-local-zones-07.txt . . . . . . . 11
A.5. draft-ietf-dnsop-default-local-zones-06.txt . . . . . . . 11
A.6. draft-ietf-dnsop-default-local-zones-05.txt . . . . . . . 11
A.7. draft-ietf-dnsop-default-local-zones-04.txt . . . . . . . 11
A.8. draft-ietf-dnsop-default-local-zones-03.txt . . . . . . . 11
A.9. draft-ietf-dnsop-default-local-zones-02.txt . . . . . . . 11
A.10. draft-ietf-dnsop-default-local-zones-01.txt . . . . . . . 11
A.11. draft-ietf-dnsop-default-local-zones-00.txt . . . . . . . 11
A.12. draft-andrews-full-service-resolvers-03.txt . . . . . . . 12
A.13. draft-andrews-full-service-resolvers-02.txt . . . . . . . 12
Appendix B. Proposed Status [To Be Removed on Publication] . . . 12
Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Andrews Expires September 26, 2010 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft Locally-served DNS Zones March 2010
1. Introduction ....................................................2
1.1. Reserved Words .............................................3
2. Effects on Sites Using RFC 1918 Addresses .......................3
3. Changes to Iterative Resolver Behaviour .........................4
4. Lists Of Zones Covered ..........................................5
4.1. RFC 1918 Zones .............................................5
4.2. RFC 5735 and RFC 5737 Zones ................................5
4.3. Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses ...............................6
4.4. IPv6 Locally Assigned Local Addresses ......................6
4.5. IPv6 Link-Local Addresses ..................................7
4.6. IPv6 Example Prefix ........................................7
5. Zones That Are Out of Scope .....................................7
6. IANA Considerations .............................................8
7. Security Considerations .........................................8
8. Acknowledgements ................................................9
9. References ......................................................9
9.1. Normative References .......................................9
9.2. Informative References ....................................10
1. Introduction
@@ -179,36 +103,48 @@ Internet-Draft Locally-served DNS Zones March 2010
allocated by [RFC1918] and the IP6.ARPA zones for locally assigned
unique local IPv6 addresses defined in [RFC4193].
Andrews Best Current Practice [Page 2]
RFC 6303 Locally Served DNS Zones July 2011
This recommendation is made because data has shown that significant
leakage of queries for these name spaces is occurring, despite
leakage of queries for these namespaces is occurring, despite
instructions to restrict them, and because it has therefore become
necessary to deploy sacrificial name servers to protect the immediate
parent name servers for these zones from excessive, unintentional,
query load [AS112] [I-D.draft-ietf-dnsop-as112-ops]
[I-D.draft-ietf-dnsop-as112-under-attack-help-help]. There is every
expectation that the query load will continue to increase unless
steps are taken as outlined here.
necessary to deploy sacrificial nameservers to protect the immediate
parent nameservers for these zones from excessive, unintentional
query load [AS112] [RFC6304] [RFC6305]. There is every expectation
that the query load will continue to increase unless steps are taken
as outlined here.
Additionally, queries from clients behind badly configured firewalls
that allow outgoing queries for these name spaces but drop the
responses, put a significant load on the root servers (forward but no
reverse zones configured). They also cause operational load for the
root server operators as they have to reply to enquiries about why
the root servers are "attacking" these clients. Changing the default
configuration will address all these issues for the zones listed in
Section 4.
that allow outgoing queries for these namespaces, but drop the
responses, put a significant load on the root servers (forward zones
but not reverse zones are configured). They also cause operational
load for the root server operators, as they have to reply to
enquiries about why the root servers are "attacking" these clients.
Changing the default configuration will address all these issues for
the zones listed in Section 4.
[RFC4193] recommends that queries for D.F.IP6.ARPA be handled
locally. This document extends the recommendation to cover the IN-
ADDR.ARPA zones for [RFC1918] and other well known IN-ADDR.ARPA and
IP6.ARPA zones for which queries should not appear on the public
locally. This document extends the recommendation to cover the
IN-ADDR.ARPA zones for [RFC1918] and other well-known IN-ADDR.ARPA
and IP6.ARPA zones for which queries should not appear on the public
Internet.
It is hoped that by doing this the number of sacrificial servers
[AS112] will not have to be increased, and may in time be reduced.
This recommendation should also help DNS responsiveness for sites
which are using [RFC1918] addresses but do not follow the last
that are using [RFC1918] addresses but do not follow the last
paragraph in Section 3 of [RFC1918].
1.1. Reserved Words
@@ -217,26 +153,25 @@ Internet-Draft Locally-served DNS Zones March 2010
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].
Andrews Expires September 26, 2010 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft Locally-served DNS Zones March 2010
2. Effects on sites using RFC 1918 addresses.
2. Effects on Sites Using RFC 1918 Addresses
For most sites using [RFC1918] addresses, the changes here will have
little or no detrimental effect. If the site does not already have
the reverse tree populated the only effect will be that the name
the reverse tree populated, the only effect will be that the name
error responses will be generated locally rather than remotely.
For sites that do have the reverse tree populated, most will either
have a local copy of the zones or will be forwarding the queries to
servers which have local copies of the zone. Therefore this
servers that have local copies of the zone. Therefore, this
recommendation will not be relevant.
Andrews Best Current Practice [Page 3]
RFC 6303 Locally Served DNS Zones July 2011
The most significant impact will be felt at sites that make use of
delegations for [RFC1918] addresses and have populated these zones.
These sites will need to override the default configuration expressed
@@ -244,64 +179,64 @@ Internet-Draft Locally-served DNS Zones March 2010
sites will be fully disconnected from the Internet and have their own
root servers for their own non-Internet DNS tree.
3. Changes to Iterative Resolver Behaviour.
3. Changes to Iterative Resolver Behaviour
Unless configured otherwise, an iterative resolver will now return
authoritatively (aa=1) name errors (RCODE=3) for queries within the
authoritatively (AA=1) name errors (RCODE=3) for queries within the
zones in Section 4, with the obvious exception of queries for the
zone name itself where SOA, NS and "no data" responses will be
zone name itself where SOA, NS, and "no data" responses will be
returned as appropriate to the query type. One common way to do this
all at once is to serve empty (SOA and NS only) zones.
An implementation of this recommendation MUST provide a mechanism to
disable this new behaviour, and SHOULD allow this decision on a zone
by zone basis.
disable this new behaviour, and SHOULD allow this decision on a zone-
by-zone basis.
If using empty zones one SHOULD NOT use the same NS and SOA records
as used on the public Internet servers as that will make it harder to
detect the origin of the responses and thus any leakage to the public
Internet servers. This document recommends that the NS record
as used on the public Internet servers, as that will make it harder
to detect the origin of the responses and thus any leakage to the
public Internet servers. It is RECOMMENDED that the NS record
defaults to the name of the zone and the SOA MNAME defaults to the
name of the only NS RR's target. The SOA RNAME should default to
"nobody.invalid." [RFC2606]. Implementations SHOULD provide a
mechanism to set these values. No address records need to be
provided for the name server.
name of the only NS RR's (Resource Record's) target. The SOA RNAME
SHOULD default to "nobody.invalid." [RFC2606]. Implementations
SHOULD provide a mechanism to set these values. No address records
need to be provided for the nameserver.
Below is an example of a generic empty zone in master file format.
It will produce a negative cache TTL of 3 hours.
It will produce a negative cache Time to Live (TTL) of 3 hours.
@ 10800 IN SOA @ nobody.invalid. 1 3600 1200 604800 10800
@ 10800 IN NS @
Andrews Expires September 26, 2010 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft Locally-served DNS Zones March 2010
The SOA RR is needed to support negative caching [RFC2308] of name
error responses and to point clients to the primary master for DNS
dynamic updates.
SOA values of particular importance are the MNAME, the SOA RR's TTL
SOA values of particular importance are the MNAME, the SOA RR's TTL,
and the negTTL value. Both TTL values SHOULD match. The rest of the
SOA timer values MAY be chosen arbitrarily since they are not
intended to control any zone transfer activity.
The NS RR is needed as some UPDATE [RFC2136] clients use NS queries
to discover the zone to be updated. Having no address records for
the name server is expected to abort UPDATE processing in the client.
the nameserver is expected to abort UPDATE processing in the client.
Andrews Best Current Practice [Page 4]
RFC 6303 Locally Served DNS Zones July 2011
4. Lists Of Zones Covered
The following subsections are intended to seed the IANA registry as
requested in the IANA Considerations Section. The zone name is the
entity to be registered.
The following subsections are the initial contents of the IANA
registry as described in the IANA Considerations section. Following
the caveat in that section, the list contains only reverse zones
corresponding to permanently assigned address space. The zone name
is the entity to be registered.
4.1. RFC1918 Zones
4.1. RFC 1918 Zones
The following zones correspond to the IPv4 address space reserved in
[RFC1918].
@@ -329,46 +264,51 @@ Internet-Draft Locally-served DNS Zones March 2010
| 168.192.IN-ADDR.ARPA |
+----------------------+
4.2. RFC 5735 and RFC 5737 Zones
Andrews Expires September 26, 2010 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft Locally-served DNS Zones March 2010
4.2. RFC3330 and RFC5737 Zones
The following zones correspond to those address ranges from [RFC3330]
The following zones correspond to those address ranges from [RFC5735]
and [RFC5737] that are not expected to appear as source or
destination addresses on the public Internet and to not have a unique
name to associate with.
destination addresses on the public Internet; as such, there are no
globally unique names associated with the addresses in these ranges.
The recommendation to serve an empty zone 127.IN-ADDR.ARPA is not a
Andrews Best Current Practice [Page 5]
RFC 6303 Locally Served DNS Zones July 2011
The recommendation to serve an empty zone 127.IN-ADDR.ARPA is not an
attempt to discourage any practice to provide a PTR RR for
1.0.0.127.IN-ADDR.ARPA locally. In fact, a meaningful reverse
mapping should exist, but the exact setup is out of the scope of this
document. Similar logic applies to the reverse mapping for ::1
(Section 4.3). The recommendations made here simply assume no other
coverage for these domains exists.
(Section 4.3). The recommendations made here simply assume that no
other coverage for these domains exists.
+------------------------------+------------------------+
| Zone | Description |
+------------------------------+------------------------+
| 0.IN-ADDR.ARPA | IPv4 "THIS" NETWORK |
| 127.IN-ADDR.ARPA | IPv4 LOOP-BACK NETWORK |
| 254.169.IN-ADDR.ARPA | IPv4 LINK LOCAL |
| 2.0.192.IN-ADDR.ARPA | IPv4 TEST NET 1 |
| 100.51.198.IN-ADDR.ARPA | IPv4 TEST NET 2 |
| 113.0.203.IN-ADDR.ARPA | IPv4 TEST NET 3 |
| 255.255.255.255.IN-ADDR.ARPA | IPv4 BROADCAST |
+------------------------------+------------------------+
+------------------------------+-----------------------+
| Zone | Description |
+------------------------------+-----------------------+
| 0.IN-ADDR.ARPA | IPv4 "THIS" NETWORK |
| 127.IN-ADDR.ARPA | IPv4 Loopback NETWORK |
| 254.169.IN-ADDR.ARPA | IPv4 LINK LOCAL |
| 2.0.192.IN-ADDR.ARPA | IPv4 TEST-NET-1 |
| 100.51.198.IN-ADDR.ARPA | IPv4 TEST-NET-2 |
| 113.0.203.IN-ADDR.ARPA | IPv4 TEST-NET-3 |
| 255.255.255.255.IN-ADDR.ARPA | IPv4 BROADCAST |
+------------------------------+-----------------------+
4.3. Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses
The reverse mappings ([RFC3596], Section 2.5 IP6.ARPA Domain) for the
IPv6 Unspecified (::) and Loopback (::1) addresses ([RFC4291],
Sections 2.4, 2.5.2 and 2.5.3) are covered by these two zones:
The reverse mappings ([RFC3596], Section 2.5 ("IP6.ARPA Domain")) for
the IPv6 Unspecified (::) and Loopback (::1) addresses ([RFC4291],
Sections 2.4, 2.5.2, and 2.5.3) are covered by these two zones:
+-------------------------------------------+
| Zone |
@@ -379,20 +319,10 @@ Internet-Draft Locally-served DNS Zones March 2010
| 0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.IP6.ARPA |
+-------------------------------------------+
Note: Line breaks and a escapes '\' have been inserted above for
Note: Line breaks and escapes ('\') have been inserted above for
readability and to adhere to line width constraints. They are not
parts of the zone names.
Andrews Expires September 26, 2010 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft Locally-served DNS Zones March 2010
4.4. IPv6 Locally Assigned Local Addresses
Section 4.4 of [RFC4193] already required special treatment of:
@@ -403,10 +333,17 @@ Internet-Draft Locally-served DNS Zones March 2010
| D.F.IP6.ARPA |
+--------------+
4.5. IPv6 Link Local Addresses
IPv6 Link-Local Addresses as of [RFC4291], Section 2.5.6 are covered
by four distinct reverse DNS zones:
Andrews Best Current Practice [Page 6]
RFC 6303 Locally Served DNS Zones July 2011
4.5. IPv6 Link-Local Addresses
IPv6 Link-Local Addresses as described in [RFC4291], Section 2.5.6
are covered by four distinct reverse DNS zones:
+----------------+
| Zone |
@@ -427,13 +364,12 @@ Internet-Draft Locally-served DNS Zones March 2010
| 8.B.D.0.1.0.0.2.IP6.ARPA |
+--------------------------+
Note: 8.B.D.0.1.0.0.2.IP6.ARPA is not being used as a example here.
Note: 8.B.D.0.1.0.0.2.IP6.ARPA is not being used as an example here.
5. Zones that are Out-Of-Scope
5. Zones That Are Out of Scope
IPv6 site-local addresses (deprecated, see [RFC4291] Sections 2.4 and
2.5.7), and IPv6 Non-Locally Assigned Local addresses ([RFC4193]) are
2.5.7), and IPv6 non-locally assigned local addresses ([RFC4193]) are
not covered here.
It is expected that IPv6 site-local addresses will be self correcting
@@ -442,54 +378,61 @@ Internet-Draft Locally-served DNS Zones March 2010
F.E.F.IP6.ARPA may still need to be deployed in the short term if the
traffic becomes excessive.
Andrews Expires September 26, 2010 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft Locally-served DNS Zones March 2010
For IPv6 Non-Locally Assigned Local addresses (L = 0) [RFC4193],
For IPv6 non-locally assigned local addresses (L = 0) [RFC4193],
there has been no decision made about whether the Regional Internet
Registries (RIRs) will provide delegations in this space or not. If
they don't, then C.F.IP6.ARPA will need to be added to the list in
Section 4.4. If they do, then registries will need to take steps to
ensure that name servers are provided for these addresses.
ensure that nameservers are provided for these addresses.
This document also ignores IP6.INT. IP6.INT has been wound up with
only legacy resolvers now generating reverse queries under IP6.INT
[RFC4159].
Andrews Best Current Practice [Page 7]
RFC 6303 Locally Served DNS Zones July 2011
IP6.INT was once used to provide reverse mapping for IPv6. IP6.INT
was deprecated in [RFC4159] and the delegation removed from the INT
zone in June 2006. While it is possible that legacy software
continues to send queries for names under the IP6.INT domain, this
document does not specify that IP6.INT be considered a local zone.
This document has also deliberately ignored names immediately under
the root domain. While there is a subset of queries to the root name
servers which could be addressed using the techniques described here
(e.g. .local, .workgroup and IPv4 addresses), there is also a vast
amount of traffic that requires a different strategy (e.g. lookups
for unqualified hostnames, IPv6 addresses).
the root domain. While there is a subset of queries to the root
nameservers that could be addressed using the techniques described
here (e.g., .local, .workgroup, and IPv4 addresses), there is also a
vast amount of traffic that requires a different strategy (e.g.,
lookups for unqualified hostnames, IPv6 addresses).
6. IANA Considerations
This document requests that IANA establish a registry of zones which
require this default behaviour. The initial contents of this
registry are defined in Section 4. Implementors are encouraged to
periodically check this registry and adjust their implementations to
reflect changes therein.
IANA has established a registry of zones that require this default
behaviour. The initial contents of this registry are defined in
Section 4. Implementors are encouraged to periodically check this
registry and adjust their implementations to reflect changes therein.
This registry can be amended through "IETF Review" as per [RFC5226].
As part of this review process, it should be noted that once a zone
is added it is effectively added permanently; once an address range
starts being configured as a local zone in systems on the Internet,
it will be impossible to reverse those changes.
IANA should co-ordinate with the RIRs to ensure that, as DNSSEC is
deployed in the reverse tree, delegations for these zones are made in
the manner described in Section 7.
IANA should coordinate with the RIRs to ensure that, as DNS Security
(DNSSEC) is deployed in the reverse tree, delegations for these zones
are made in the manner described in Section 7.
7. Security Considerations
During the initial deployment phase, particularly where [RFC1918]
addresses are in use, there may be some clients that unexpectedly
receive a name error rather than a PTR record. This may cause some
service disruption until their recursive name server(s) have been re-
configured.
service disruption until their recursive nameserver(s) have been
re-configured.
As DNSSEC is deployed within the IN-ADDR.ARPA and IP6.ARPA
namespaces, the zones listed above will need to be delegated as
@@ -497,26 +440,23 @@ Internet-Draft Locally-served DNS Zones March 2010
DNSSEC validation to succeed for queries in these spaces despite not
being answered from the delegated servers.
Andrews Expires September 26, 2010 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft Locally-served DNS Zones March 2010
It is recommended that sites actively using these namespaces secure
them using DNSSEC [RFC4035] by publishing and using DNSSEC trust
anchors. This will protect the clients from accidental import of
unsigned responses from the Internet.
Andrews Best Current Practice [Page 8]
RFC 6303 Locally Served DNS Zones July 2011
8. Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the US National Science Foundation
(research grant SCI-0427144) and DNS-OARC.
9. References
9.1. Normative References
@@ -534,18 +474,19 @@ Internet-Draft Locally-served DNS Zones March 2010
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[RFC2136] Vixie, P., Thomson, A., Rekhter, Y., and J. Bound,
[RFC2136] Vixie, P., Ed., Thomson, S., Rekhter, Y., and J. Bound,
"Dynamic Updates in the Domain Name System (DNS UPDATE)",
RFC 2136, April 1997.
[RFC2308] Andrews, M., "Negative Caching of DNS Queries (DNS
NCACHE)", RFC 2398, March 1998.
NCACHE)", RFC 2308, March 1998.
[RFC2606] Eastlake, D. and A. Panitz, "Reserved Top Level DNS
[RFC2606] Eastlake 3rd, D. and A. Panitz, "Reserved Top Level DNS
Names", BCP 32, RFC 2606, June 1999.
[RFC3596] Thomson, S., Huitema, C., Ksinant, V., and M. Souissi,
"DNS Extensions to Support IPv6", RFC 3596, October 2003.
"DNS Extensions to Support IP Version 6", RFC 3596,
October 2003.
[RFC4035] Arends, R., Austein, R., Larson, M., Massey, D., and S.
Rose, "Protocol Modifications for the DNS Security
@@ -554,143 +495,44 @@ Internet-Draft Locally-served DNS Zones March 2010
[RFC4159] Huston, G., "Deprecation of "ip6.int"", BCP 109, RFC 4159,
August 2005.
Andrews Expires September 26, 2010 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft Locally-served DNS Zones March 2010
[RFC4193] Hinden, R. and B. Haberman, "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast
Addresses", RFC 4193, October 2005.
Andrews Best Current Practice [Page 9]
RFC 6303 Locally Served DNS Zones July 2011
[RFC4291] Hinden, R. and S. Deering, "IP Version 6 Addressing
Architecture", RFC 4291, February 2006.
[RFC5226] Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an
IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 5226,
October 2008.
May 2008.
9.2. Informative References
[AS112] "AS112 Project", <http://www.as112.net/>.
[I-D.draft-ietf-dnsop-as112-ops]
Abley, J. and W. Maton, "AS112 Nameserver Operations",
draft-ietf-dnsop-as112-ops-01 (work in progress),
November 2007.
[I-D.draft-ietf-dnsop-as112-under-attack-help-help]
Abley, J. and W. Maton, "I'm Being Attacked by
PRISONER.IANA.ORG!",
draft-ietf-dnsop-as112-under-attack-help-help-01 (work in
progress), November 2007.
[RFC3330] "Special-Use IPv4 Addresses", RFC 3330, September 2002.
[RFC3849] Huston, G., Lord, A., and P. Smith, "IPv6 Address Prefix
Reserved for Documentation", RFC 3849, July 2004.
[RFC5737] Arkko, J., Cotton, M., and L. Vergoda, "IPv4 Address
Blocks Reserved for Documentation", RFC 5737,
January 2010.
[RFC5735] Cotton, M. and L. Vegoda, "Special Use IPv4 Addresses",
BCP 153, RFC 5735, January 2010.
[RFC5737] Arkko, J., Cotton, M., and L. Vegoda, "IPv4 Address Blocks
Reserved for Documentation", RFC 5737, January 2010.
Appendix A. Change History [To Be Removed on Publication]
A.1. draft-ietf-dnsop-default-local-zones-10.txt
added RFC 5737 zones
A.2. draft-ietf-dnsop-default-local-zones-09.txt
refresh awaiting writeup
Andrews Expires September 26, 2010 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft Locally-served DNS Zones March 2010
A.3. draft-ietf-dnsop-default-local-zones-08.txt
editorial, reference updates
A.4. draft-ietf-dnsop-default-local-zones-07.txt
none, expiry prevention
A.5. draft-ietf-dnsop-default-local-zones-06.txt
add IPv6 example prefix
A.6. draft-ietf-dnsop-default-local-zones-05.txt
none, expiry prevention
A.7. draft-ietf-dnsop-default-local-zones-04.txt
Centrally Assigned Local addresses -> Non-Locally Assigned Local
address
A.8. draft-ietf-dnsop-default-local-zones-03.txt
expanded section 4 descriptions
Added references [RFC2136], [RFC3596],
[I-D.draft-ietf-dnsop-as112-ops] and
[I-D.draft-ietf-dnsop-as112-under-attack-help-help].
Revised language.
A.9. draft-ietf-dnsop-default-local-zones-02.txt
RNAME now "nobody.invalid."
Revised language.
A.10. draft-ietf-dnsop-default-local-zones-01.txt
Revised impact description.
Updated to reflect change in IP6.INT status.
A.11. draft-ietf-dnsop-default-local-zones-00.txt
Adopted by DNSOP.
"Author's Note" re-titled "Zones that are Out-Of-Scope"
Andrews Expires September 26, 2010 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft Locally-served DNS Zones March 2010
Add note that these zone are expected to seed the IANA registry.
Title changed.
A.12. draft-andrews-full-service-resolvers-03.txt
Added "Proposed Status".
A.13. draft-andrews-full-service-resolvers-02.txt
Added 0.IN-ADDR.ARPA.
Appendix B. Proposed Status [To Be Removed on Publication]
This Internet-Draft is being submitted for eventual publication as an
RFC with a proposed status of Best Current Practice.
[RFC6304] Abley, J. and W. Maton, "AS112 Nameserver Operations",
RFC 6304, July 2011.
[RFC6305] Abley, J. and W. Maton, "I'm Being Attacked by
PRISONER.IANA.ORG!", RFC 6305, July 2011.
Author's Address
@@ -700,7 +542,7 @@ Author's Address
Redwood City, CA 94063
US
Email: marka@isc.org
EMail: marka@isc.org
@@ -717,12 +559,5 @@ Author's Address
Andrews Expires September 26, 2010 [Page 13]
Andrews Best Current Practice [Page 10]