new draft
This commit is contained in:
@@ -3,11 +3,11 @@
|
||||
|
||||
Network Working Group W. Hardaker
|
||||
Internet-Draft Sparta
|
||||
Expires: July 17, 2006 January 13, 2006
|
||||
Expires: August 25, 2006 February 21, 2006
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Use of SHA-256 in DNSSEC Delegation Signer (DS) Resource Records (RRs)
|
||||
draft-ietf-dnsext-ds-sha256-04.txt
|
||||
draft-ietf-dnsext-ds-sha256-05.txt
|
||||
|
||||
Status of this Memo
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ Status of this Memo
|
||||
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
|
||||
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
|
||||
|
||||
This Internet-Draft will expire on July 17, 2006.
|
||||
This Internet-Draft will expire on August 25, 2006.
|
||||
|
||||
Copyright Notice
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -52,9 +52,9 @@ Abstract
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Hardaker Expires July 17, 2006 [Page 1]
|
||||
Hardaker Expires August 25, 2006 [Page 1]
|
||||
|
||||
Internet-Draft Use of SHA-256 in DNSSEC DS RRs January 2006
|
||||
Internet-Draft Use of SHA-256 in DNSSEC DS RRs February 2006
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Table of Contents
|
||||
@@ -71,8 +71,8 @@ Table of Contents
|
||||
6.1. Potential Digest Type Downgrade Attacks . . . . . . . . . . 5
|
||||
6.2. SHA-1 vs SHA-256 Considerations for DS Records . . . . . . 6
|
||||
7. Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
|
||||
8. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
|
||||
8.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
|
||||
8. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
|
||||
8.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
|
||||
8.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
|
||||
Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
|
||||
Intellectual Property and Copyright Statements . . . . . . . . . . 9
|
||||
@@ -108,9 +108,9 @@ Table of Contents
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Hardaker Expires July 17, 2006 [Page 2]
|
||||
Hardaker Expires August 25, 2006 [Page 2]
|
||||
|
||||
Internet-Draft Use of SHA-256 in DNSSEC DS RRs January 2006
|
||||
Internet-Draft Use of SHA-256 in DNSSEC DS RRs February 2006
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
1. Introduction
|
||||
@@ -123,14 +123,18 @@ Internet-Draft Use of SHA-256 in DNSSEC DS RRs January 2006
|
||||
record, owned by the same domain as the DS RRset and with a type
|
||||
covered of DS.
|
||||
|
||||
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
|
||||
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
|
||||
document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
2. Implementing the SHA-256 algorithm for DS record support
|
||||
|
||||
This document specifies that the digest type code [XXX: To be
|
||||
assigned by IANA; likely 2] is to be assigned to SHA-256 [SHA256] for
|
||||
use within DS records. The results of the digest algorithm MUST NOT
|
||||
be truncated and the entire 32 byte digest result is to be published
|
||||
in the DS record.
|
||||
assigned by IANA; likely 2] is to be assigned to SHA-256 [SHA256]
|
||||
[SHA256CODE] for use within DS records. The results of the digest
|
||||
algorithm MUST NOT be truncated and the entire 32 byte digest result
|
||||
is to be published in the DS record.
|
||||
|
||||
2.1. DS record field values
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -160,13 +164,9 @@ Internet-Draft Use of SHA-256 in DNSSEC DS RRs January 2006
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Hardaker Expires July 17, 2006 [Page 3]
|
||||
Hardaker Expires August 25, 2006 [Page 3]
|
||||
|
||||
Internet-Draft Use of SHA-256 in DNSSEC DS RRs January 2006
|
||||
Internet-Draft Use of SHA-256 in DNSSEC DS RRs February 2006
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3
|
||||
@@ -220,9 +220,9 @@ Internet-Draft Use of SHA-256 in DNSSEC DS RRs January 2006
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Hardaker Expires July 17, 2006 [Page 4]
|
||||
Hardaker Expires August 25, 2006 [Page 4]
|
||||
|
||||
Internet-Draft Use of SHA-256 in DNSSEC DS RRs January 2006
|
||||
Internet-Draft Use of SHA-256 in DNSSEC DS RRs February 2006
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
the validator has no supported authentication path leading from the
|
||||
@@ -241,6 +241,8 @@ Internet-Draft Use of SHA-256 in DNSSEC DS RRs January 2006
|
||||
|
||||
5. IANA Considerations
|
||||
|
||||
Only one IANA action is required by this document:
|
||||
|
||||
The Digest Type to be used for supporting SHA-256 within DS records
|
||||
needs to be assigned by IANA. This document requests that the Digest
|
||||
Type value of 2 be assigned to the SHA-256 digest algorithm.
|
||||
@@ -270,17 +272,18 @@ Internet-Draft Use of SHA-256 in DNSSEC DS RRs January 2006
|
||||
|
||||
For example, if the following conditions are all true:
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Hardaker Expires August 25, 2006 [Page 5]
|
||||
|
||||
Internet-Draft Use of SHA-256 in DNSSEC DS RRs February 2006
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
o Both SHA-1 and SHA-256 based digests are published in DS records
|
||||
within a parent zone for a given child zone's DNSKEY.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Hardaker Expires July 17, 2006 [Page 5]
|
||||
|
||||
Internet-Draft Use of SHA-256 in DNSSEC DS RRs January 2006
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
o The DS record with the SHA-1 digest matches the digest computed
|
||||
using the child zone's DNSKEY.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -293,9 +296,13 @@ Internet-Draft Use of SHA-256 in DNSSEC DS RRs January 2006
|
||||
|
||||
6.2. SHA-1 vs SHA-256 Considerations for DS Records
|
||||
|
||||
Because of the weaknesses recently discovered within the SHA-1
|
||||
algorithm, users of DNSSEC are encouraged to deploy the use of SHA-
|
||||
256 as soon as the software implementations in use allow for it.
|
||||
Users of DNSSEC are encouraged to deploy SHA-256 as soon as software
|
||||
implementations allow for it. SHA-256 is widely believed to be more
|
||||
resilient to attack than SHA-1, and confidence in SHA-1's strength is
|
||||
being eroded by recently-announced attacks. Regardless of whether or
|
||||
not the attacks on SHA-1 will affect DNSSEC, it is believed (at the
|
||||
time of this writing) that SHA-256 is the better choice for use in DS
|
||||
records.
|
||||
|
||||
At the time of this publication, the SHA-256 digest algorithm is
|
||||
considered sufficiently strong for the immediate future. It is also
|
||||
@@ -317,26 +324,30 @@ Internet-Draft Use of SHA-256 in DNSSEC DS RRs January 2006
|
||||
went into the base documents.
|
||||
|
||||
The following people contributed to portions of this document in some
|
||||
fashion: Mark Andrews, Roy Arends, Olafur Gudmundsson, Olaf M.
|
||||
Kolkman, Edward Lewis, Scott Rose, Stuart E. Schechter, Sam Weiler.
|
||||
fashion: Mark Andrews, Roy Arends, Olafur Gudmundsson, Paul Hoffman,
|
||||
Olaf M. Kolkman, Edward Lewis, Scott Rose, Stuart E. Schechter, Sam
|
||||
Weiler.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Hardaker Expires August 25, 2006 [Page 6]
|
||||
|
||||
Internet-Draft Use of SHA-256 in DNSSEC DS RRs February 2006
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
8. References
|
||||
|
||||
8.1. Normative References
|
||||
|
||||
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
|
||||
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
|
||||
|
||||
[RFC4033] Arends, R., Austein, R., Larson, M., Massey, D., and S.
|
||||
Rose, "DNS Security Introduction and Requirements",
|
||||
RFC 4033, March 2005.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Hardaker Expires July 17, 2006 [Page 6]
|
||||
|
||||
Internet-Draft Use of SHA-256 in DNSSEC DS RRs January 2006
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[RFC4034] Arends, R., Austein, R., Larson, M., Massey, D., and S.
|
||||
Rose, "Resource Records for the DNS Security Extensions",
|
||||
RFC 4034, March 2005.
|
||||
@@ -351,7 +362,7 @@ Internet-Draft Use of SHA-256 in DNSSEC DS RRs January 2006
|
||||
8.2. Informative References
|
||||
|
||||
[SHA256CODE]
|
||||
Motorola Labs, "US Secure Hash Algorithms (SHA)",
|
||||
Eastlake, D., "US Secure Hash Algorithms (SHA)",
|
||||
June 2005.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -377,20 +388,9 @@ Internet-Draft Use of SHA-256 in DNSSEC DS RRs January 2006
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Hardaker Expires July 17, 2006 [Page 7]
|
||||
Hardaker Expires August 25, 2006 [Page 7]
|
||||
|
||||
Internet-Draft Use of SHA-256 in DNSSEC DS RRs January 2006
|
||||
Internet-Draft Use of SHA-256 in DNSSEC DS RRs February 2006
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Author's Address
|
||||
@@ -398,7 +398,7 @@ Author's Address
|
||||
Wes Hardaker
|
||||
Sparta
|
||||
P.O. Box 382
|
||||
Davis 95617
|
||||
Davis, CA 95617
|
||||
US
|
||||
|
||||
Email: hardaker@tislabs.com
|
||||
@@ -444,9 +444,9 @@ Author's Address
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Hardaker Expires July 17, 2006 [Page 8]
|
||||
Hardaker Expires August 25, 2006 [Page 8]
|
||||
|
||||
Internet-Draft Use of SHA-256 in DNSSEC DS RRs January 2006
|
||||
Internet-Draft Use of SHA-256 in DNSSEC DS RRs February 2006
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Intellectual Property Statement
|
||||
@@ -500,5 +500,5 @@ Acknowledgment
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Hardaker Expires July 17, 2006 [Page 9]
|
||||
Hardaker Expires August 25, 2006 [Page 9]
|
||||
|
||||
File diff suppressed because it is too large
Load Diff
1904
doc/draft/draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-operational-practices-07.txt
Normal file
1904
doc/draft/draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-operational-practices-07.txt
Normal file
File diff suppressed because it is too large
Load Diff
Reference in New Issue
Block a user