github-starred/vikunja
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/go-vikunja/vikunja.git synced 2026-05-11 08:20:40 -05:00
Code Issues 690 Packages Projects Releases 11 Wiki Activity

[PR #1151] [MERGED] chore(deps): update dependency esbuild to v0.25.8 #9045

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-04-23 08:39:02 -05:00 by GiteaMirror · 0 comments
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-23 08:39:02 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link

📋 Pull Request Information

Original PR: https://github.com/go-vikunja/vikunja/pull/1151
Author: @renovate[bot]
Created: 7/20/2025
Status: ✅ Merged
Merged: 7/20/2025
Merged by: @kolaente

Base: main ← Head: renovate/dev-dependencies

📝 Commits (1)

  • 3694879 chore(deps): update dependency esbuild to v0.25.8

📊 Changes

2 files changed (+111 additions, -111 deletions)

View changed files

📝 frontend/package.json (+1 -1)
📝 frontend/pnpm-lock.yaml (+110 -110)

📄 Description

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
esbuild 0.25.7 -> 0.25.8 age confidence

Release Notes

evanw/esbuild (esbuild)

v0.25.8

Compare Source

  • Fix another TypeScript parsing edge case (#​4248)

    This fixes a regression with a change in the previous release that tries to more accurately parse TypeScript arrow functions inside the ?: operator. The regression specifically involves parsing an arrow function containing a #private identifier inside the middle of a ?: ternary operator inside a class body. This was fixed by propagating private identifier state into the parser clone used to speculatively parse the arrow function body. Here is an example of some affected code:

    class CachedDict {
  #has = (a: string) => dict.has(a);
  has = window
    ? (word: string): boolean => this.#has(word)
    : this.#has;
}

  • Fix a regression with the parsing of source phase imports

    The change in the previous release to parse source phase imports failed to properly handle the following cases:

    import source from 'bar'
import source from from 'bar'
import source type foo from 'bar'

    Parsing for these cases should now be fixed. The first case was incorrectly treated as a syntax error because esbuild was expecting the second case. And the last case was previously allowed but is now forbidden. TypeScript hasn't added this feature yet so it remains to be seen whether the last case will be allowed, but it's safer to disallow it for now. At least Babel doesn't allow the last case when parsing TypeScript, and Babel was involved with the source phase import specification.

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - Between 12:00 AM and 03:59 AM ( * 0-3 * * * ) (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

🔄 This issue represents a GitHub Pull Request. It cannot be merged through Gitea due to API limitations.

## 📋 Pull Request Information **Original PR:** https://github.com/go-vikunja/vikunja/pull/1151 **Author:** [@renovate[bot]](https://github.com/apps/renovate) **Created:** 7/20/2025 **Status:** ✅ Merged **Merged:** 7/20/2025 **Merged by:** [@kolaente](https://github.com/kolaente) **Base:** `main` ← **Head:** `renovate/dev-dependencies` --- ### 📝 Commits (1) - [`3694879`](https://github.com/go-vikunja/vikunja/commit/36948798bff15001b98244b67ffbacf320e71d0a) chore(deps): update dependency esbuild to v0.25.8 ### 📊 Changes **2 files changed** (+111 additions, -111 deletions) <details> <summary>View changed files</summary> 📝 `frontend/package.json` (+1 -1) 📝 `frontend/pnpm-lock.yaml` (+110 -110) </details> ### 📄 Description This PR contains the following updates: | Package | Change | Age | Confidence | |---|---|---|---| | [esbuild](https://redirect.github.com/evanw/esbuild) | [`0.25.7` -> `0.25.8`](https://renovatebot.com/diffs/npm/esbuild/0.25.7/0.25.8) | [![age](https://developer.mend.io/api/mc/badges/age/npm/esbuild/0.25.8?slim=true)](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/) | [![confidence](https://developer.mend.io/api/mc/badges/confidence/npm/esbuild/0.25.7/0.25.8?slim=true)](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/) | --- ### Release Notes <details> <summary>evanw/esbuild (esbuild)</summary> ### [`v0.25.8`](https://redirect.github.com/evanw/esbuild/blob/HEAD/CHANGELOG.md#0258) [Compare Source](https://redirect.github.com/evanw/esbuild/compare/v0.25.7...v0.25.8) - Fix another TypeScript parsing edge case ([#&#8203;4248](https://redirect.github.com/evanw/esbuild/issues/4248)) This fixes a regression with a change in the previous release that tries to more accurately parse TypeScript arrow functions inside the `?:` operator. The regression specifically involves parsing an arrow function containing a `#private` identifier inside the middle of a `?:` ternary operator inside a class body. This was fixed by propagating private identifier state into the parser clone used to speculatively parse the arrow function body. Here is an example of some affected code: ```ts class CachedDict { #has = (a: string) => dict.has(a); has = window ? (word: string): boolean => this.#has(word) : this.#has; } ``` - Fix a regression with the parsing of source phase imports The change in the previous release to parse [source phase imports](https://redirect.github.com/tc39/proposal-source-phase-imports) failed to properly handle the following cases: ```ts import source from 'bar' import source from from 'bar' import source type foo from 'bar' ``` Parsing for these cases should now be fixed. The first case was incorrectly treated as a syntax error because esbuild was expecting the second case. And the last case was previously allowed but is now forbidden. TypeScript hasn't added this feature yet so it remains to be seen whether the last case will be allowed, but it's safer to disallow it for now. At least Babel doesn't allow the last case when parsing TypeScript, and Babel was involved with the source phase import specification. </details> --- ### Configuration 📅 **Schedule**: Branch creation - Between 12:00 AM and 03:59 AM ( * 0-3 * * * ) (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined). 🚦 **Automerge**: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied. ♻ **Rebasing**: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox. 🔕 **Ignore**: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again. --- - [ ] <!-- rebase-check -->If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box --- This PR was generated by [Mend Renovate](https://mend.io/renovate/). View the [repository job log](https://developer.mend.io/github/go-vikunja/vikunja). <!--renovate-debug:eyJjcmVhdGVkSW5WZXIiOiI0MS4yMy4yIiwidXBkYXRlZEluVmVyIjoiNDEuMjMuMiIsInRhcmdldEJyYW5jaCI6Im1haW4iLCJsYWJlbHMiOlsiZGVwZW5kZW5jaWVzIl19--> --- <sub>🔄 This issue represents a GitHub Pull Request. It cannot be merged through Gitea due to API limitations.</sub>
GiteaMirror added the pull-request label 2026-04-23 08:39:02 -05:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
area/api
area/attachments
area/auth
area/avatars
area/backup-restore
area/caldav
area/calendar-view
area/comments
area/config
area/database
area/desktop
area/docker
area/email
area/favorites
area/filters
area/frontend
area/gantt
area/i18n
area/import-export
area/internal-code
area/kanban
area/labels
area/list-view
area/mobile
area/notifications
area/permissions
area/projects
area/pwa
area/recurring-tasks
area/reminders
area/search
area/shortcuts
area/subtasks
area/sync
area/table-view
area/task-editor
area/task-metadata
area/task-relations
area/teams
area/theming
area/time-tracking
area/typesense
area/views
area/webhooks
bug
changes requested
concern/accessibility
concern/performance
concern/regression
concern/ux
confirmed
db/mysql
dependencies
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
integration/inbound
integration/outbound
kind/bug
kind/feature
needs reproduction
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 question
security
support
upstream issue
waiting for reply
wontfix
No Label pull-request
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
GiteaMirror ninjasurge
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/vikunja#9045
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?