github-starred/vikunja
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/go-vikunja/vikunja.git synced 2026-05-06 03:27:53 -05:00
Code Issues 690 Packages Projects Releases 11 Wiki Activity

[GH-ISSUE #652] Filter out tasks that don't have a due date? #6280

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-04-20 16:51:27 -05:00 by GiteaMirror · 2 comments
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-20 16:51:27 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @nickian on GitHub (Apr 3, 2025).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/go-vikunja/vikunja/issues/652

Is it not currently possible to use a filter to ONLY show tasks that have a due date set?

What am I missing here? Even if I have a query like this: done = false && dueDate > now I still see all of my tasks that don't have a due date assigned to them.

This seems to work fine when I go into a task and filter the table view. But it does not work with a saved filter.

Originally created by @nickian on GitHub (Apr 3, 2025). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/go-vikunja/vikunja/issues/652 Is it not currently possible to use a filter to ONLY show tasks that have a due date set? What am I missing here? Even if I have a query like this: `done = false && dueDate > now` I still see all of my tasks that don't have a due date assigned to them. This seems to work fine when I go into a task and filter the table view. But it does not work with a saved filter.
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-20 16:51:29 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@nickian commented on GitHub (Apr 3, 2025):

Nevermind! Spoke to spoon. I had the the "include tasks without a value" box checked.

That being said, I think it would be better to add an option like this: dueDate != false vs having to do something like this dueDate > 1900.

<!-- gh-comment-id:2790391339 --> @nickian commented on GitHub (Apr 3, 2025): Nevermind! Spoke to spoon. I had the the "include tasks without a value" box checked. That being said, I think it would be better to add an option like this: `dueDate != false` vs having to do something like this `dueDate > 1900`.
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-20 16:51:30 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@kolaente commented on GitHub (Apr 9, 2025):

Glad you figured it out! There is a similar issue here: https://github.com/go-vikunja/vikunja/issues/285

I'll close this one in favor of that.

<!-- gh-comment-id:2790392060 --> @kolaente commented on GitHub (Apr 9, 2025): Glad you figured it out! There is a similar issue here: https://github.com/go-vikunja/vikunja/issues/285 I'll close this one in favor of that.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
area/api
area/attachments
area/auth
area/avatars
area/backup-restore
area/caldav
area/calendar-view
area/comments
area/config
area/database
area/desktop
area/docker
area/email
area/favorites
area/filters
area/frontend
area/gantt
area/i18n
area/import-export
area/internal-code
area/kanban
area/labels
area/list-view
area/mobile
area/notifications
area/permissions
area/projects
area/pwa
area/recurring-tasks
area/reminders
area/search
area/shortcuts
area/subtasks
area/sync
area/table-view
area/task-editor
area/task-metadata
area/task-relations
area/teams
area/theming
area/time-tracking
area/typesense
area/views
area/webhooks
bug
changes requested
concern/accessibility
concern/performance
concern/regression
concern/ux
confirmed
db/mysql
dependencies
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
integration/inbound
integration/outbound
kind/bug
kind/feature
needs reproduction
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 question
security
support
upstream issue
waiting for reply
wontfix
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
GiteaMirror ninjasurge
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/vikunja#6280
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?