github-starred/vikunja
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/go-vikunja/vikunja.git synced 2026-05-05 19:18:16 -05:00
Code Issues 690 Packages Projects Releases 11 Wiki Activity

Unable to add new members to team #101

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-11-01 20:46:57 -05:00 by GiteaMirror · 10 comments
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-01 20:46:57 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @canadaduane on GitHub (Nov 1, 2022).

Description

When trying to add a member to the team, the drop-down does not autosuggest anyone, and therefore I cannot add anyone to the team.

I can confirm that the request is being made--in the network tab the /api/v1/users?s=[query] call is being made, but the response is always null, even when I type the initial letters of a team member that I know is in the system (for example, when I removed "ava" from the team, then tried to add her back, typing "a" or "av" or "ava" does not autosuggest her user).

Vikunja Frontend Version

0.20.0

Vikunja API Version

0.20.0

Browser and version

Firefox 106.0.1

Can you reproduce the bug on the Vikunja demo site?

Yes

Screenshots

image

Originally created by @canadaduane on GitHub (Nov 1, 2022). ### Description When trying to add a member to the team, the drop-down does not autosuggest anyone, and therefore I cannot add anyone to the team. I can confirm that the request is being made--in the network tab the `/api/v1/users?s=[query]` call is being made, but the response is always null, even when I type the initial letters of a team member that I know is in the system (for example, when I removed "ava" from the team, then tried to add her back, typing "a" or "av" or "ava" does not autosuggest her user). ### Vikunja Frontend Version 0.20.0 ### Vikunja API Version 0.20.0 ### Browser and version Firefox 106.0.1 ### Can you reproduce the bug on the Vikunja demo site? Yes ### Screenshots ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/129/199253539-102b53ed-195b-4230-8843-ee33f11c37ab.png)
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-01 20:46:57 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@dpschen commented on GitHub (Nov 1, 2022):

This is definitely a mistake. Will investigate.

@dpschen commented on GitHub (Nov 1, 2022): This is definitely a mistake. Will investigate.
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-01 20:46:58 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@kolaente commented on GitHub (Nov 1, 2022):

There have been changes to the way user Search works in the last release to avoid enumerating all users on a server. This mostly means you'll need to enter the exact username of the user you're trying to add or (if they have it enabled) the exact email or display name of the user.
Can you check if it works if you try it like that?

@kolaente commented on GitHub (Nov 1, 2022): There have been changes to the way user Search works in the last release to avoid enumerating all users on a server. This mostly means you'll need to enter the exact username of the user you're trying to add or (if they have it enabled) the exact email or display name of the user. Can you check if it works if you try it like that?
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-01 20:46:58 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@canadaduane commented on GitHub (Nov 2, 2022):

Yes, it works if I add the exact username. Is there a list of users somewhere?

@canadaduane commented on GitHub (Nov 2, 2022): Yes, it works if I add the exact username. Is there a list of users somewhere?
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-01 20:46:58 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@kolaente commented on GitHub (Nov 2, 2022):

You can use the vikunja user list command to show a list of all users.

@kolaente commented on GitHub (Nov 2, 2022): You can use the [`vikunja user list`](https://vikunja.io/docs/cli/#user-list) command to show a list of all users.
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-01 20:46:58 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@dpschen commented on GitHub (Nov 9, 2022):

Maybe we should change this so that admins can have access to the user names.
They are admins after all

@dpschen commented on GitHub (Nov 9, 2022): Maybe we should change this so that admins can have access to the user names. They are admins after all
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-01 20:46:58 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@kolaente commented on GitHub (Nov 9, 2022):

@dpschen The admin permission is only applied to the current team. The search is globally, on the server.

@kolaente commented on GitHub (Nov 9, 2022): @dpschen The admin permission is only applied to the current team. The search is globally, on the server.
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-01 20:46:59 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@dpschen commented on GitHub (Nov 9, 2022):

Okay, that makes sense.
We should still improve the UX here somehow. And if it's only to describe what you can search for, why it's that restricted and how you can change that.

@dpschen commented on GitHub (Nov 9, 2022): Okay, that makes sense. We should still improve the UX here somehow. And if it's only to describe what you can search for, why it's that restricted and how you can change that.
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-01 20:46:59 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@dpschen commented on GitHub (Nov 9, 2022):

Does adding via mail always work? Because that should. If the person is not registered I guess an invitation should be sent

@dpschen commented on GitHub (Nov 9, 2022): Does adding via mail always work? Because that should. If the person is not registered I guess an invitation should be sent
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-01 20:47:00 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@kolaente commented on GitHub (Nov 9, 2022):

Does adding via mail always work?

It only works if the user is discoverable by searching for the mail address.

@kolaente commented on GitHub (Nov 9, 2022): > Does adding via mail always work? It only works if the user is discoverable by searching for the mail address.
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-01 20:47:00 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@kolaente commented on GitHub (Nov 9, 2022):

If the person is not registered I guess an invitation should be sent

I think there's an item somewhere in the backlog about this.

@kolaente commented on GitHub (Nov 9, 2022): > If the person is not registered I guess an invitation should be sent I think there's an item somewhere in the backlog about this.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
area/api
area/attachments
area/auth
area/avatars
area/backup-restore
area/caldav
area/calendar-view
area/comments
area/config
area/database
area/desktop
area/docker
area/email
area/favorites
area/filters
area/frontend
area/gantt
area/i18n
area/import-export
area/internal-code
area/kanban
area/labels
area/list-view
area/mobile
area/notifications
area/permissions
area/projects
area/pwa
area/recurring-tasks
area/reminders
area/search
area/shortcuts
area/subtasks
area/sync
area/table-view
area/task-editor
area/task-metadata
area/task-relations
area/teams
area/theming
area/time-tracking
area/typesense
area/views
area/webhooks
bug
changes requested
concern/accessibility
concern/performance
concern/regression
concern/ux
confirmed
db/mysql
dependencies
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
integration/inbound
integration/outbound
kind/bug
kind/feature
needs reproduction
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 question
security
support
upstream issue
waiting for reply
wontfix
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
GiteaMirror ninjasurge
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/vikunja#101
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?