Whenever a task is part of a date filter, it might fall in or out of a filter bucket without anything changing, other than the current time. For example, a filter condition like due_date > now may include different tasks depending on the current time.
For these kinds of tasks to properly show up in the kanban view of a filter, there has to be an entry in the task_buckets table. These entries only got updated when either a task was updated or the filter itself was updated. To account for th changing of time, we also need to check periodically if tasks are now part or not anymore part of that filter.
This change adds a cron task to do precisely that.
We'll have to see if this works resource-wise, but the cron is not the only one doing a bunch of sql queries so it might be fine after all.
Resolves https://community.vikunja.io/t/tasks-in-saved-filter-appear-in-list-view-but-are-not-visible-in-kanban-view/2800
This change allows to specify the task index when creating a task, which will then be checked to avoid duplicates and used. This allows us to calculate the indexes for all tasks beforehand when creating them at once using quick add magic.
The method is not bulletproof, but already fixes a problem where multiple tasks would have the same index when created that way.
Resolves https://community.vikunja.io/t/add-multiple-tasks-at-once/333/16
Bcrypt allows a maximum of 72 bytes. This is part of the algorithm and not something we could change in Vikunja. The solution here was to restrict the password during registration to a max length of 72 bytes. In the future, this should be changed to hash passwords with sha512 or similar before hashing them with bcrypt. Because they should also be salted in that case and the added complexity during the migration phase, this was not implemented yet.
The change in this commit only improves the error handling to return an input error instead of a server error when the user enters a password > 72 bytes.
Resolves https://vikunja.sentry.io/share/issue/e8e0b64612d84504942feee002ac498a/
Vikunja now uses one recursive CTE and a few optimizations to fetch all subscribers for a task or project. This makes the relevant code easier to maintain and more performant.
Before this fix, a project subscription object was added twice to the list of subscriptions for a task when the user did not subscribe to the task directly. This caused the user to receive a comment notification twice for a given task.
This was probably a regression from efde364224.
Resolves https://community.vikunja.io/t/e-mail-notification-twice/2740/18
kolaente
Frederick [Bot]andkolaente