Possible to use without a volume (connect to gcp or aws storage bucket instead or nosql document store) #555

New Issue

2025-11-07T06:41:06-06:00

GiteaMirror commented

2025-11-07 06:41:06 -06:00

Originally created by @dslovin on GitHub (Jan 3, 2020).

Subject of the issue

Want to use without a local storage volume. Either use a Document DB or cloud storage bucket

Install method: docker
Clients used: all
Reverse proxy and version: all
Version of mysql/postgresql: all
Other relevant information:

Steps to reproduce

Expected behaviour

Actual behaviour

Relevant logs

Originally created by @dslovin on GitHub (Jan 3, 2020). ### Subject of the issue Want to use without a local storage volume. Either use a Document DB or cloud storage bucket * Install method: docker * Clients used: all  * Reverse proxy and version: all * Version of mysql/postgresql: all  * Other relevant information: ### Steps to reproduce  ### Expected behaviour  ### Actual behaviour  ### Relevant logs

GiteaMirror closed this issue

2025-11-07 06:41:06 -06:00

GiteaMirror commented

2025-11-07 06:41:07 -06:00

@mprasil commented on GitHub (Jan 3, 2020):

That is not supported. We use diesel as DB backend and that one does not support Document DB. You can use either hosted MySQL or PostgreSQL although I understand these wouldn't be as cheap to run.

There's pretty cool serverless implementation of bitwarden API although from my understanding much more limited, but maybe that would be good enough for you?

@mprasil commented on GitHub (Jan 3, 2020): That is not supported. We use [diesel](https://diesel.rs/) as DB backend and that one does not support Document DB. You can use either hosted MySQL or PostgreSQL although I understand these wouldn't be as cheap to run. There's pretty cool [serverless implementation of bitwarden API](https://github.com/vvondra/bitwarden-serverless) although from my understanding much more limited, but maybe that would be good enough for you?

GiteaMirror commented

2025-11-07 06:41:07 -06:00

@dslovin commented on GitHub (Jan 4, 2020):

Thanks, I’ll check it out. I really liked your implementation. Hopefully you consider serverless in the future :)

@dslovin commented on GitHub (Jan 4, 2020): Thanks, I’ll check it out. I really liked your implementation. Hopefully you consider serverless in the future :)

GiteaMirror commented

2025-11-07 06:41:07 -06:00

@mprasil commented on GitHub (Jan 14, 2020):

I think we can close this as the question was answered and AFAIK it's not going to happen anytime soon. (It would require support in Diesel or major code change to support any of the other DBs)

@mprasil commented on GitHub (Jan 14, 2020): I think we can close this as the question was answered and AFAIK it's not going to happen anytime soon. (It would require support in Diesel or major code change to support any of the other DBs)