Backup option in the admin panel not available in Docker #4034

New Issue

Closed

opened 2026-03-07 19:25:09 -06:00 by GiteaMirror · 4 comments

GiteaMirror commented 2026-03-07 19:25:09 -06:00

Owner

Copy Link

Copy Source

Originally created by @Skaronator on GitHub (Aug 31, 2019).

Hi!

Just saw in the changelog that you can now backup the SQLite Database in the admin web interface but saidly it looks like that option isn't available for me.

Looks like this check results in a false:
https://github.com/dani-garcia/bitwarden_rs/blob/026f9da035dcbf5ff12387600162841f94b47154/src/api/admin.rs#L39-L41

since sqlite isn't available in the container:
https://github.com/dani-garcia/bitwarden_rs/blob/469318bcbdca68ca58735f7cc58dd1e943e4da1e/docker/amd64/sqlite/Dockerfile#L32-L35

I tried the following docker images:

• bitwardenrs/server:alpine
• bitwardenrs/server:latest

Currently running version 1.10.0-469318bc

Originally created by @Skaronator on GitHub (Aug 31, 2019). Hi! Just saw in the changelog that you can now backup the SQLite Database in the admin web interface but saidly it looks like that option isn't available for me.  Looks like this check results in a `false`: https://github.com/dani-garcia/bitwarden_rs/blob/026f9da035dcbf5ff12387600162841f94b47154/src/api/admin.rs#L39-L41 since sqlite isn't available in the container: https://github.com/dani-garcia/bitwarden_rs/blob/469318bcbdca68ca58735f7cc58dd1e943e4da1e/docker/amd64/sqlite/Dockerfile#L32-L35 I tried the following docker images: - bitwardenrs/server:alpine - bitwardenrs/server:latest Currently running version 1.10.0-469318bc

GiteaMirror closed this issue 2026-03-07 19:25:09 -06:00

GiteaMirror commented 2026-03-07 19:25:10 -06:00

Author

Owner

Copy Link

Copy Source

@mprasil commented on GitHub (Sep 4, 2019):

Those lines you linked are for the build container, the final image never had sqlite bundled in. The PR #475 was merged with the understanding that there will be better option than running external command once the sqlite 3.27 becomes more common.

So right now, you can build your own version of the image with sqlite bundled in. Or we can discuss bundling in another binary or we can see if newer sqlite library and built-in backup functionality would be an option now. (the latest would be the ideal solution IMO)

@mprasil commented on GitHub (Sep 4, 2019): Those lines you linked are for the build container, the final image never had sqlite bundled in. The PR #475 was merged with the understanding that there will be better option than running external command once the sqlite `3.27` becomes more common. So right now, you can build your own version of the image with sqlite bundled in. Or we can discuss bundling in another binary or we can see if newer sqlite library and built-in backup functionality would be an option now. (the latest would be the ideal solution IMO)

GiteaMirror commented 2026-03-07 19:25:10 -06:00

Author

Owner

Copy Link

Copy Source

@TheMardy commented on GitHub (Sep 30, 2019):

@mprasil
I'm afraid we will have to wait for a few more months for the ideal solution.
We will need a libsqlite-sys 0.17 crate (that version uses SQLite 3.27 for VACUUM INTO support)
After that is out, we have to wait for Diesel to support it as libsqlite-sys 0.17 has a few breaking changes.

@TheMardy commented on GitHub (Sep 30, 2019): @mprasil I'm afraid we will have to wait for a few more months for the ideal solution. We will need a libsqlite-sys 0.17 crate (that version uses SQLite 3.27 for `VACUUM INTO` support) After that is out, we have to wait for Diesel to support it as libsqlite-sys 0.17 has a few breaking changes.

GiteaMirror commented 2026-03-07 19:25:11 -06:00

Author

Owner

Copy Link

Copy Source

@mprasil commented on GitHub (Sep 30, 2019):

I've created PR #638 to use the binary in the meantime.

@mprasil commented on GitHub (Sep 30, 2019): I've created PR #638 to use the binary in the meantime.

GiteaMirror commented 2026-03-07 19:25:11 -06:00

Author

Owner

Copy Link

Copy Source

@mprasil commented on GitHub (Oct 2, 2019):

The latest images should have sqlite bundled in and the backup option should be present in the admin interface. I'm going to resolve this.

@mprasil commented on GitHub (Oct 2, 2019): The latest images should have sqlite bundled in and the backup option should be present in the admin interface. I'm going to resolve this.

Sign in to join this conversation.

No Branch/Tag Specified

Branches Tags

main

v2-registration

revert-7033-patch-1

cached-config-operations

test_dylint

1.37.2

1.37.1

1.37.0

1.36.0

1.35.8

1.35.7

1.35.6

1.35.5

1.35.4

1.35.3

1.35.2

1.35.1

1.35.0

1.34.3

1.34.2

1.34.1

1.34.0

1.33.2

1.33.1

1.33.0

1.32.7

1.32.6

1.32.5

1.32.4

1.32.3

1.32.2

1.32.1

1.32.0

1.31.0

1.30.5

1.30.4

1.30.3

1.30.2

1.30.1

1.30.0

1.29.2

1.29.1

1.29.0

1.28.1

1.28.0

1.27.0

1.26.0

1.25.2

1.25.1

1.25.0

1.24.0

1.23.1

1.23.0

1.22.2

1.22.1

1.22.0

1.21.0

1.20.0

1.19.0

1.18.0

1.17.0

1.16.3

1.16.2

1.16.1

1.16.0

1.15.1

1.15.0

1.14.2

1.14.1

1.14

1.13.1

1.13.0

1.12.0

1.11.0

1.10.0

1.9.1

1.9.0

1.8.0

1.7.0

1.6.1

1.6.0

1.5.0

1.4.0

1.3.0

1.2.0

1.1.0

1.0.0

0.13.0

0.12.0

0.11.0

0.10.0

0.9.0

Labels

Clear labels

better for forum

bug

documentation

duplicate

enhancement

future Vault

good first issue

help wanted

low priority

notes

pull-request

Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request

question

SSO

Third party

troubleshooting

wontfix

No labels

Milestone

No items

No Milestone

Projects

Clear projects

No projects

Assignees

Clear assignees

GiteaMirror ninjasurge (Kaehlen Rog)

No Assignees

1 Participants

Notifications

Subscribe

Due Date

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/vaultwarden#4034