[GH-ISSUE #173] Semantic Versioning added to gitver #981

Closed
opened 2026-04-16 10:04:30 -05:00 by GiteaMirror · 3 comments
Owner

Originally created by @manuelbua on GitHub (Jan 12, 2014).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/semver/semver/issues/173

I added support for custom string formats in my little tool gitver, so now Semantic Versioning is possible as well: i'm looking for testers and opinions, would you mind helping test it?

Gitver is a very simple, lightweight, tag-based version string manager for git, written in Python: it generates version strings by using Python-based formatting rules coupled with repository information, augmented by user-defined data.

Thanks in advance!

PS: i know this isn't the best place to ask, but this is the best place to find knowledgable programmers on the subject.

Originally created by @manuelbua on GitHub (Jan 12, 2014). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/semver/semver/issues/173 I added support for custom string formats in my little tool [gitver](https://github.com/manuelbua/gitver), so now Semantic Versioning is possible as well: i'm looking for testers and opinions, would you mind helping test it? Gitver is a very simple, lightweight, tag-based version string manager for git, written in Python: it generates version strings by using Python-based formatting rules coupled with repository information, augmented by user-defined data. Thanks in advance! PS: i know this isn't the best place to ask, but this is the best place to find knowledgable programmers on the subject.
Author
Owner

@jwdonahue commented on GitHub (Dec 5, 2017):

@manuelbua, according to your readme.md file, gitver expects tags of the form [v]X.Y.Z[.REVISION][-PRE-RELEASE-METADATA], which is not actually SemVer compliant. This a very old issue which nobody has responded to until now, please close it at your earliest possible convenience.

<!-- gh-comment-id:349173722 --> @jwdonahue commented on GitHub (Dec 5, 2017): @manuelbua, according to your readme.md file, gitver expects tags of the form [v]X.Y.Z[.REVISION][-PRE-RELEASE-METADATA], which is not actually SemVer compliant. This a very old issue which nobody has responded to until now, please close it at your earliest possible convenience.
Author
Owner

@manuelbua commented on GitHub (Dec 5, 2017):

Hi @jwdonahue, thanks for taking the time for giving some feedback.
Yes, the input gitver expects are variations of that format, but what i meant when i said it support SemVer is that it can actually produce SemVer-compliant output, not that it also accepts tag in that format, that wasn't a goal either.

<!-- gh-comment-id:349280678 --> @manuelbua commented on GitHub (Dec 5, 2017): Hi @jwdonahue, thanks for taking the time for giving some feedback. Yes, the input gitver expects are variations of that format, but what i meant when i said it support SemVer is that it can actually **produce SemVer-compliant output**, not that it also accepts tag in that format, that wasn't a goal either.
Author
Owner

@jwdonahue commented on GitHub (Dec 5, 2017):

@manuelbua, can you please close this issue, it's been three years, there's no SemVer related question to answer and no actions to be taken on the spec.

<!-- gh-comment-id:349407749 --> @jwdonahue commented on GitHub (Dec 5, 2017): @manuelbua, can you please close this issue, it's been three years, there's no SemVer related question to answer and no actions to be taken on the spec.
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/semver#981