mirror of
https://github.com/semver/semver.git
synced 2026-07-11 06:53:03 -05:00
[GH-ISSUE #55] How about some responsive design? #910
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Delete Branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @pieroxy on GitHub (Nov 28, 2012).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/semver/semver/issues/55
The design for the spec could be enhanced by very few things:
width: auto;
margin: 0 10%;
max-width: 710px;
@-ms-viewport { width: device-width; }
html { -webkit-text-size-adjust: 100%; }
And ta-daaaa! The site works with all devices including those narrower than 710px wide. iPhones, Android, everything works, even resizing your browsers.
That said, nice work for the SemVer.
@haacked commented on GitHub (Nov 28, 2012):
Nice suggestions! Could you submit the suggestions in the form of a pull request?
@pieroxy commented on GitHub (Nov 29, 2012):
Will do as soon as I free up more than 5 contiguous minutes ;-)
@pieroxy commented on GitHub (Nov 30, 2012):
Well, I'm not sure I get it all. I'm new to GitHub so pardon me if I'm missing something big. I see only one file in the repo, which is an ascii version of the spec: semver.md
Which repo should I fork in order to make my suggested changes? I don't see any HTML or CSS files in there.
@pieroxy commented on GitHub (Nov 30, 2012):
Never mind, I got it.
@pieroxy commented on GitHub (Nov 30, 2012):
Pull request submitted. And if I got it right, it might just work !
@haacked commented on GitHub (Dec 6, 2012):
Hi pieroxy, maybe I missed it, but I don't see the pull request.
@pieroxy commented on GitHub (Dec 6, 2012):
I did it on the semver.org project...
https://github.com/mojombo/semver.org/pulls
@haacked commented on GitHub (Dec 6, 2012):
Oh, of course! Heh!
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 10:03 AM, pieroxy notifications@github.com wrote:
@haacked commented on GitHub (Dec 20, 2012):
Closing this one since there's a proper PR on the other one. I'll review that as soon as I figure out how to run it locally to try it out. :)