[GH-ISSUE #280] Relation to Semantic Versioning OSGi Whitepaper #7176

New Issue

GiteaMirror · 2026-06-20T17:01:08-05:00

GiteaMirror commented

2026-06-20 17:01:08 -05:00

Originally created by @kwin on GitHub (Nov 12, 2015).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/semver/semver/issues/280

There is another whitepaper written by OSGi: http://www.osgi.org/wp-content/uploads/SemanticVersioning1.pdf.
How does your spec relate to that?

Originally created by @kwin on GitHub (Nov 12, 2015). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/semver/semver/issues/280 There is another whitepaper written by OSGi: http://www.osgi.org/wp-content/uploads/SemanticVersioning1.pdf. How does your spec relate to that?

GiteaMirror closed this issue

2026-06-20 17:01:08 -05:00

GiteaMirror commented

2026-06-20 17:01:09 -05:00

@jwdonahue commented on GitHub (Dec 9, 2017):

@kwin, from the executive summary, it's obvious they are not basing theirs on SemVer. The only relationship is similar names and tertiary similarities in semantics. Unless you have further questions, please close this issue at your earliest possible convenience.

@jwdonahue commented on GitHub (Dec 9, 2017): @kwin, from the executive summary, it's obvious they are not basing theirs on SemVer. The only relationship is similar names and tertiary similarities in semantics. Unless you have further questions, please close this issue at your earliest possible convenience.

GiteaMirror commented

2026-06-20 17:01:09 -05:00

@kwin commented on GitHub (Dec 9, 2017):

Thanks for the clarification.

@kwin commented on GitHub (Dec 9, 2017): Thanks for the clarification.

Sign in to join this conversation.

1 Participants

Notifications

Due Date

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/semver#7176