github-starred/semver
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/semver/semver.git synced 2026-07-11 05:12:48 -05:00
Code Issues 1.0k Packages Projects Releases 4 Wiki Activity

Sad CSS? #356

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-02-17 11:55:23 -06:00 by GiteaMirror · 6 comments
GiteaMirror commented 2026-02-17 11:55:23 -06:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @hartwork on GitHub (Jan 4, 2019).

Hi!

Why is the current CSS so sad and all black(, grey) and white?
What are your requirements for pull request touching CSS to be more friendly?

Thanks and best, Sebastian

Originally created by @hartwork on GitHub (Jan 4, 2019). Hi! Why is the current CSS so sad and all black(, grey) and white? What are your requirements for pull request touching CSS to be more friendly? Thanks and best, Sebastian
GiteaMirror commented 2026-02-17 11:55:25 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@ghost commented on GitHub (Jan 28, 2019):

Hi,

Different people have different views on styles, therefore changes in CSS aren't necessary unless they make better accessibility.

After all semver.org is just a site for presenting a specification so the point is to make things clear instead of fancy, and the current CSS is doing the job well.

PS You can fork semver/semver.org and open a pull request if you don't want to change your mind.

Ren

@ghost commented on GitHub (Jan 28, 2019): Hi, Different people have different views on styles, therefore changes in CSS aren't necessary unless they make better accessibility. After all semver.org is just a site for presenting a specification so the point is to make things clear instead of fancy, and the current CSS is doing the job well. *PS* You can fork [semver/semver.org](https://github.com/semver/semver.org) and open a pull request if you don't want to change your mind. Ren
GiteaMirror commented 2026-02-17 11:55:26 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@hartwork commented on GitHub (Jan 28, 2019):

Hi Ren,

I have started playing with things a bit and come to realize that the markdown sources miss use of single backticks for code in general and for all translations. To really get somewhere shiny, that would be needed. So that pile of work made me decide to not try much further and to limit myself to fixing a few smaller issues only, for now.

@hartwork commented on GitHub (Jan 28, 2019): Hi Ren, I have started playing with things a bit and come to realize that the markdown sources miss use of single backticks for code in general and for all translations. To really get somewhere shiny, that would be needed. So that pile of work made me decide to not try much further and to limit myself to [fixing a few smaller issues](https://github.com/semver/semver.org/pulls?q=is%3Apr+author%3Ahartwork+) only, for now.
GiteaMirror commented 2026-02-17 11:55:26 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@hartwork commented on GitHub (Jan 28, 2019):

PS: I should have mentioned that https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.0.0/ is a good example of what I would wish for https://semver.org/ visually, instead.

@hartwork commented on GitHub (Jan 28, 2019): PS: I should have mentioned that https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.0.0/ is a good example of what I would wish for https://semver.org/ visually, instead.
GiteaMirror commented 2026-02-17 11:55:28 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@klehelley commented on GitHub (Jan 28, 2019):

While it may be beneficial to pimp up semver.org a little bit, keepachangelog.com is probably not such a good example. It sure looks nice, but with the variety of sections and colours it is a little too distracting to my taste. Other may disagree though.

@klehelley commented on GitHub (Jan 28, 2019): While it may be beneficial to pimp up semver.org a little bit, keepachangelog.com is probably not such a good example. It sure looks nice, but with the variety of sections and colours it is a little too distracting to my taste. Other may disagree though.
GiteaMirror commented 2026-02-17 11:55:29 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@hartwork commented on GitHub (Jan 28, 2019):

I agree about the distraction part to some extent. I'll leave to other to judge if the added fun it provides is worth a few bits of distraction or not.

@hartwork commented on GitHub (Jan 28, 2019): I agree about the distraction part to some extent. I'll leave to other to judge if the added fun it provides is worth a few bits of distraction or not.
GiteaMirror commented 2026-02-17 11:55:30 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@steveklabnik commented on GitHub (Feb 11, 2019):

Hi, this repository is for the specification itself; website bugs should go over at https://github.com/semver/semver.org. Thanks!

@steveklabnik commented on GitHub (Feb 11, 2019): Hi, this repository is for the specification itself; website bugs should go over at https://github.com/semver/semver.org. Thanks!
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
bug
consensus seeking
duplicate
extend
layout
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 question
RFC
spelling/grammar
staled
update
waiting for PR
won't fix
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
GiteaMirror ninjasurge
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/semver#356
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?