mirror of
https://github.com/semver/semver.git
synced 2026-07-11 06:53:03 -05:00
[GH-ISSUE #160] "PATCH" might be ambiguous #1836
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Delete Branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @mj8w on GitHub (Aug 30, 2013).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/semver/semver/issues/160
I am wondering if there is a better moniker for patch. Patch has other connotations, as a diff file supplied to apply a "fix". I was looking for a more general term, or, maybe someone can help me think differently about the term.
Mike
@bessarabov commented on GitHub (Aug 30, 2013):
[Major] [Miror] [Trivial]?
@TheSamsterZA commented on GitHub (Sep 5, 2013):
I use [Major].[Minor].[Micro] and [Major].[Minor].[Patch] interchangeably.
@mj8w commented on GitHub (Sep 7, 2013):
In my mind, perhaps "incremental" best describes the type of changes at
this level.
@voidmain commented on GitHub (Oct 14, 2013):
I feel that Trivial is subjective and Patch is objective. You are Patching a well defined release to fix a bug. Additionally, Incremental implies new features where Patch does not. You could call this level Fix or Bug but most people feel that Patch=Fix.
@rlidwka commented on GitHub (Dec 15, 2013):
"Micro" looks like a good idea, certainly better than "Patch".
@maximal commented on GitHub (Dec 15, 2013):
@haacked commented on GitHub (Dec 15, 2013):
Patch is based on practices that existed before SemVer was around and has been part of the spec from the beginning. Unless we found that naming this "Patch" caused people's computers to be formatted by accident, I don't see any reason to change it at this point.
@rlidwka commented on GitHub (Dec 21, 2013):
In Karl Fogel's book about OSS 3rd number is called "micro", quoting:
So, "micro" is preferred to avoid confusion.