github-starred/semver
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/semver/semver.git synced 2026-07-11 05:12:48 -05:00
Code Issues 1.0k Packages Projects Releases 4 Wiki Activity

Semantic Versioning Specification (SemVer) 9.entry #132

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-02-17 11:19:57 -06:00 by GiteaMirror · 3 comments
GiteaMirror commented 2026-02-17 11:19:57 -06:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @muzir on GitHub (May 9, 2014).

At examples of this entry; there is an example version like "1.0.0-0.3.7" but isn't it a conflict with " Numeric identifiers MUST NOT include leading zeroes" sentence at the same entry? Because this example pre-release is starting with "0" after "-" symbol.

Originally created by @muzir on GitHub (May 9, 2014). At examples of this entry; there is an example version like "1.0.0-0.3.7" but isn't it a conflict with " Numeric identifiers MUST NOT include leading zeroes" sentence at the same entry? Because this example pre-release is starting with "0" after "-" symbol.
GiteaMirror commented 2026-02-17 11:19:59 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@crazedsanity commented on GitHub (May 9, 2014):

It's not a conflict: the version after the dash (0.3.7) has a major version of 0 (zero), minor version of 3, patch of 7. It's perfectly valid to have a zero as any of the version bits.

@crazedsanity commented on GitHub (May 9, 2014): It's not a conflict: the version after the dash (0.3.7) has a major version of 0 (zero), minor version of 3, patch of 7. It's perfectly valid to have a zero as any of the version bits.
GiteaMirror commented 2026-02-17 11:20:00 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@FichteFoll commented on GitHub (May 9, 2014):

No, the zero in this case is a number by itself. What the clause excludes is things like 01.

@FichteFoll commented on GitHub (May 9, 2014): No, the zero in this case is a number by itself. What the clause excludes is things like `01`.
GiteaMirror commented 2026-02-17 11:20:00 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeffhandley commented on GitHub (Jul 9, 2014):

Sounds like this can be closed, @Haacked.

@jeffhandley commented on GitHub (Jul 9, 2014): Sounds like this can be closed, @Haacked.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
bug
consensus seeking
duplicate
extend
layout
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 question
RFC
spelling/grammar
staled
update
waiting for PR
won't fix
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
GiteaMirror ninjasurge
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/semver#132
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?