How to support traefik resource loadbalance with healthCheck #573

New Issue

2025-11-13T12:04:46-06:00

GiteaMirror commented

2025-11-13 12:04:46 -06:00

Originally created by @Aliang-code on GitHub (Aug 10, 2025).

Is there a way to config service healthCheck by pangolin?

http:
  servicess:
    Service-1:
      servers:
        - url: "http://private-ip-server-1/"
        - url: "http://private-ip-server-2/"
      loadBalancer:
        healthCheck:
          path: /health
          interval: "10s"
          timeout: "3s"

Originally created by @Aliang-code on GitHub (Aug 10, 2025). Is there a way to config service healthCheck by pangolin? ``` http: servicess: Service-1: servers: - url: "http://private-ip-server-1/" - url: "http://private-ip-server-2/" loadBalancer: healthCheck: path: /health interval: "10s" timeout: "3s" ```

GiteaMirror closed this issue

2025-11-13 12:04:47 -06:00

GiteaMirror commented

2025-11-13 12:04:47 -06:00

@Xentrice commented on GitHub (Aug 11, 2025):

I could take a look at this. Should be relatively easy to implement.
Does require tweaking in many areas, most likely including a db migration - due to personal time constraints it might take me 1-2 weeks. Feel free to assign me if you want and I'll open a draft PR shortly with any questions I might have.

@Xentrice commented on GitHub (Aug 11, 2025): I could take a look at this. Should be relatively easy to implement. Does require tweaking in many areas, most likely including a db migration - due to personal time constraints it might take me 1-2 weeks. Feel free to assign me if you want and I'll open a draft PR shortly with any questions I might have.

GiteaMirror commented

2025-11-13 12:04:48 -06:00

@Aliang-code commented on GitHub (Aug 12, 2025):

I could take a look at this. Should be relatively easy to implement. Does require tweaking in many areas, most likely including a db migration - due to personal time constraints it might take me 1-2 weeks. Feel free to assign me if you want and I'll open a draft PR shortly with any questions I might have.

Yes that's great, I think this is very useful for reverse proxy

@Aliang-code commented on GitHub (Aug 12, 2025): > I could take a look at this. Should be relatively easy to implement. Does require tweaking in many areas, most likely including a db migration - due to personal time constraints it might take me 1-2 weeks. Feel free to assign me if you want and I'll open a draft PR shortly with any questions I might have. Yes that's great, I think this is very useful for reverse proxy

GiteaMirror commented

2025-11-13 12:04:48 -06:00

@oschwartz10612 commented on GitHub (Aug 16, 2025):

Coming soon 😉 dont work on it @Xentrice

@oschwartz10612 commented on GitHub (Aug 16, 2025): Coming soon :wink: dont work on it @Xentrice