github-starred/pangolin
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/fosrl/pangolin.git synced 2026-11-13 06:14:30 -06:00
Code Issues 1.6k Packages Projects Releases 79 Wiki Activity

Inbound tunnels / Service mesh #412

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-11-13 11:59:41 -06:00 by GiteaMirror · 4 comments
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-13 11:59:41 -06:00
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

Originally created by @3nprob on GitHub (Jun 5, 2025).

Currently, the tunnels are unidirectional: Resources can be added to (newt or wireguard) Sites and exposed via the public Traefik reverse-proxy but as far as I can see no way for Sites to access other Sites via the Pangolin network.

We would like to have Sites able to securely access select Resources at other select Sites over the internal Wireguard network instead of having to go via the public network and the Traefik gateway.

Use-cases are for internal service-to-service access.

This would make it possible to use Pangolin like a service mesh.

One way I imagine this could be implemented would be adding configuration to newt such that it can open ports listening on localhost which would be proxied to a corresponding Resource.

Related:

Originally created by @3nprob on GitHub (Jun 5, 2025). Currently, the tunnels are unidirectional: Resources can be added to (newt or wireguard) Sites and exposed via the public Traefik reverse-proxy but as far as I can see no way for Sites to access other Sites via the Pangolin network. We would like to have Sites able to securely access select Resources at other select Sites over the internal Wireguard network instead of having to go via the public network and the Traefik gateway. Use-cases are for internal service-to-service access. This would make it possible to use Pangolin like a service mesh. One way I imagine this could be implemented would be adding configuration to newt such that it can open ports listening on `localhost` which would be proxied to a corresponding Resource. Related: - #771
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-13 11:59:42 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@3nprob commented on GitHub (Jun 5, 2025):

Possibly duplicate of #345

@3nprob commented on GitHub (Jun 5, 2025): Possibly duplicate of #345
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-13 11:59:42 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Jun 20, 2025):

This issue has been automatically marked as stale due to 14 days of inactivity. It will be closed in 14 days if no further activity occurs.

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Jun 20, 2025): This issue has been automatically marked as stale due to 14 days of inactivity. It will be closed in 14 days if no further activity occurs.
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-13 11:59:43 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@3nprob commented on GitHub (Jun 20, 2025):

not stale

@3nprob commented on GitHub (Jun 20, 2025): not stale
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-13 11:59:43 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@miloschwartz commented on GitHub (Jun 22, 2025):

Thanks, so this doesn't go stale again I'll convert this to a feature request discussion so others can upvote/continue the conversation

@miloschwartz commented on GitHub (Jun 22, 2025): Thanks, so this doesn't go stale again I'll convert this to a feature request discussion so others can upvote/continue the conversation
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
api
authentication
bug
config
dependencies
docker
documentation
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
Improvement
Look Into
needs investigating
networking
new feature
non-critical bug
potential bug
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 question
reverse proxy
Security
stale
ui
wontfix
No labels
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No projects
Assignees
Clear assignees
GiteaMirror ninjasurge (Kaehlen Rog)
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/pangolin#412