github-starred/pangolin
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/fosrl/pangolin.git synced 2026-07-15 21:31:24 -05:00
Code Issues 1.6k Packages Projects Releases 79 Wiki Activity

[GH-ISSUE #1676] Proxmox refresh #35395

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-06-18 20:25:20 -05:00 by GiteaMirror · 9 comments
GiteaMirror commented 2026-06-18 20:25:20 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @TacitTactics on GitHub (Oct 16, 2025).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/fosrl/pangolin/issues/1676

Describe the Bug

I do not know where to get the logs for this issue but it is quite frustrating. I love this tool but when running proxmox ve 9 through newt the refresh/migrations make proxmox unusable. I ended up running proxmox through nginx rp over headscale overlay VPN. I think it has something to do with rate limiting but I'm not sure.

Once again I love this application and the work you all put into it.

Environment

  • OS Type & Version: Ubuntu 24.04.03
  • Pangolin Version: latest
  • Gerbil Version: latest
  • Traefik Version: latest
  • Newt Version: latest
  • Olm Version: (if applicable)
  • proxmox ve 9.0

To Reproduce

Nothing special

Expected Behavior

Infrequent refreshes and migrations for proxmox

Originally created by @TacitTactics on GitHub (Oct 16, 2025). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/fosrl/pangolin/issues/1676 ### Describe the Bug I do not know where to get the logs for this issue but it is quite frustrating. I love this tool but when running proxmox ve 9 through newt the refresh/migrations make proxmox unusable. I ended up running proxmox through nginx rp over headscale overlay VPN. I think it has something to do with rate limiting but I'm not sure. Once again I love this application and the work you all put into it. ### Environment - OS Type & Version: Ubuntu 24.04.03 - Pangolin Version: latest - Gerbil Version: latest - Traefik Version: latest - Newt Version: latest - Olm Version: (if applicable) - proxmox ve 9.0 ### To Reproduce Nothing special ### Expected Behavior Infrequent refreshes and migrations for proxmox
GiteaMirror commented 2026-06-18 20:25:21 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@AstralDestiny commented on GitHub (Oct 19, 2025):

Sorry how is newt deployed currently? Refresh migrations is happening where? If I spin up a proxmox where can I go to replicate this?

<!-- gh-comment-id:3419800909 --> @AstralDestiny commented on GitHub (Oct 19, 2025): Sorry how is newt deployed currently? Refresh migrations is happening where? If I spin up a proxmox where can I go to replicate this?
GiteaMirror commented 2026-06-18 20:25:22 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@TacitTactics commented on GitHub (Oct 20, 2025):

Thanks for the fast reply. Newt is deployed through docker compose. I have only 1 site with about 7 resources.
The migration is something that proxmox says when it is refreshing tokens I believe. Either way I do not get the migration issue when using basic nginx server block.
To answer your question I have never tried to find any tweaks to the migration of sessions. I have never needed to on nginx. I did have the migration happen when using cloudflare zero trust tunnel but it was not frequent so I was still able to use it.

Do you think it has to do with newt? If so what logs should I check fist?

Thank you again and great tool so far. I am running more than 13 services for my home lab because of this product.

<!-- gh-comment-id:3420143557 --> @TacitTactics commented on GitHub (Oct 20, 2025): Thanks for the fast reply. Newt is deployed through docker compose. I have only 1 site with about 7 resources. The migration is something that proxmox says when it is refreshing tokens I believe. Either way I do not get the migration issue when using basic nginx server block. To answer your question I have never tried to find any tweaks to the migration of sessions. I have never needed to on nginx. I did have the migration happen when using cloudflare zero trust tunnel but it was not frequent so I was still able to use it. Do you think it has to do with newt? If so what logs should I check fist? Thank you again and great tool so far. I am running more than 13 services for my home lab because of this product.
GiteaMirror commented 2026-06-18 20:25:22 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@AstralDestiny commented on GitHub (Nov 3, 2025):

More then one proxmox or just a single proxmox sorry? Also sorry for delay the linear thing went poof.

<!-- gh-comment-id:3482925507 --> @AstralDestiny commented on GitHub (Nov 3, 2025): More then one proxmox or just a single proxmox sorry? Also sorry for delay the linear thing went poof.
GiteaMirror commented 2026-06-18 20:25:23 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@TacitTactics commented on GitHub (Nov 4, 2025):

I am running only one proxmox instance.

On Mon, Nov 3, 2025, 5:50 PM AstralDestiny @.***> wrote:

AstralDestiny left a comment (fosrl/pangolin#1676)
https://github.com/fosrl/pangolin/issues/1676#issuecomment-3482925507

More then one proxmox or just a single proxmox sorry? Also sorry for delay
the linear thing went poof.

—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/fosrl/pangolin/issues/1676#issuecomment-3482925507,
or unsubscribe
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADRQ7XDP6TTH5SLOKO6KLBD327E25AVCNFSM6AAAAACJKBYN5KVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZTIOBSHEZDKNJQG4
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
@.***>

<!-- gh-comment-id:3483858248 --> @TacitTactics commented on GitHub (Nov 4, 2025): I am running only one proxmox instance. On Mon, Nov 3, 2025, 5:50 PM AstralDestiny ***@***.***> wrote: > *AstralDestiny* left a comment (fosrl/pangolin#1676) > <https://github.com/fosrl/pangolin/issues/1676#issuecomment-3482925507> > > More then one proxmox or just a single proxmox sorry? Also sorry for delay > the linear thing went poof. > > — > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/fosrl/pangolin/issues/1676#issuecomment-3482925507>, > or unsubscribe > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADRQ7XDP6TTH5SLOKO6KLBD327E25AVCNFSM6AAAAACJKBYN5KVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZTIOBSHEZDKNJQG4> > . > You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: > ***@***.***> >
GiteaMirror commented 2026-06-18 20:25:24 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@AstralDestiny commented on GitHub (Nov 5, 2025):

So what do I need to do for the refresh sorry? To test and replicate?

<!-- gh-comment-id:3493075610 --> @AstralDestiny commented on GitHub (Nov 5, 2025): So what do I need to do for the refresh sorry? To test and replicate?
GiteaMirror commented 2026-06-18 20:25:24 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Nov 20, 2025):

This issue has been automatically marked as stale due to 14 days of inactivity. It will be closed in 14 days if no further activity occurs.

<!-- gh-comment-id:3555196430 --> @github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Nov 20, 2025): This issue has been automatically marked as stale due to 14 days of inactivity. It will be closed in 14 days if no further activity occurs.
GiteaMirror commented 2026-06-18 20:25:25 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@TacitTactics commented on GitHub (Nov 21, 2025):

I love this project, but I will just use nginx for proxmox. Just too many refreshes and migrations to make usable. Thanks

<!-- gh-comment-id:3563127577 --> @TacitTactics commented on GitHub (Nov 21, 2025): I love this project, but I will just use nginx for proxmox. Just too many refreshes and migrations to make usable. Thanks
GiteaMirror commented 2026-06-18 20:25:26 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@TacitTactics commented on GitHub (Nov 29, 2025):

Oh I do see that newt is disconnecting and then reconnecting due to public mismatch. Is this because version of pangolin and newt are out of sync?

<!-- gh-comment-id:3591700498 --> @TacitTactics commented on GitHub (Nov 29, 2025): Oh I do see that newt is disconnecting and then reconnecting due to public mismatch. Is this because version of pangolin and newt are out of sync?
GiteaMirror commented 2026-06-18 20:25:26 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@TacitTactics commented on GitHub (Nov 30, 2025):

So sorry, I found out that my issue was that I was installing too many Newt Docker containers per site. I should have really read the documentation better. Only one installation of Newt per site. One site per VLAN is ideal. Thank you

<!-- gh-comment-id:3592131701 --> @TacitTactics commented on GitHub (Nov 30, 2025): So sorry, I found out that my issue was that I was installing too many Newt Docker containers per site. I should have really read the documentation better. Only one installation of Newt per site. One site per VLAN is ideal. Thank you
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
api
authentication
bug
config
dependencies
docker
documentation
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
Improvement
Look Into
needs investigating
networking
new feature
non-critical bug
potential bug
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 question
reverse proxy
Security
stale
ui
wontfix
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
GiteaMirror ninjasurge
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/pangolin#35395
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?