[GH-ISSUE #304] Unraid template in CA not writing base domain to config.yml #3323

Closed
opened 2026-04-20 07:15:13 -05:00 by GiteaMirror · 2 comments
Owner

Originally created by @mrwizard9 on GitHub (Mar 8, 2025).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/fosrl/pangolin/issues/304

Originally assigned to: @miloschwartz on GitHub.

Seems like this might be a bug in 1.0? The unraid config/template does not appear to be writing the base domain to the config.yml file properly. This wasn't an issue prior to 1.0 release.

It can be added manually but it is being compounded by encountering permissions issues when attempting to edit the config.yml file in something like code-server.

Originally created by @mrwizard9 on GitHub (Mar 8, 2025). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/fosrl/pangolin/issues/304 Originally assigned to: @miloschwartz on GitHub. Seems like this might be a bug in 1.0? The unraid config/template does not appear to be writing the base domain to the config.yml file properly. This wasn't an issue prior to 1.0 release. It can be added manually but it is being compounded by encountering permissions issues when attempting to edit the config.yml file in something like code-server.
Author
Owner

@miloschwartz commented on GitHub (Mar 8, 2025):

I am revisiting/refreshing the Unraid config. The significant changes to the config.yml during the course of the beta have made Unraid difficult.

<!-- gh-comment-id:2708376564 --> @miloschwartz commented on GitHub (Mar 8, 2025): I am revisiting/refreshing the Unraid config. The significant changes to the `config.yml` during the course of the beta have made Unraid difficult.
Author
Owner

@oschwartz10612 commented on GitHub (Mar 10, 2025):

Should be resolved in 1.0.1 by #319

<!-- gh-comment-id:2710977040 --> @oschwartz10612 commented on GitHub (Mar 10, 2025): Should be resolved in 1.0.1 by #319
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/pangolin#3323