github-starred/pangolin
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/fosrl/pangolin.git synced 2026-03-12 01:44:06 -05:00
Code Issues 94 Packages Projects Releases 48 Wiki Activity

Gerbil Wireguard route traffic through VPS #265

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-11-13 11:54:54 -06:00 by GiteaMirror · 3 comments
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-13 11:54:54 -06:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @aaronjoeldev on GitHub (Apr 24, 2025).

Hey,

I have successfully installed Pangolin on my VPS. My current goal is to be able to use my HomeLab services remotely from my iPhone. Since there is currently no Newt solution for the iPhone, I am using Wireguard. I would like to use the rules of Pangolin to whitelist the IP of the iPhone in the VPN. However, my current problem is that with the standard Wireguard config from Gerbil, the traffic is not routed via the VPS and therefore the iPhone does not receive the VPS IP.
I have tried to set allowedIPs to 0.0.0.0/0 so that all traffic goes through the VPS. However, I then no longer have an internet connection.
My approach is now to adjust this via NAT Config on the VPS. Unfortunately, all my attempts so far have been unsuccessful. Is there a specific approach to the Pangolin setup with Gerbil to achieve this?

Thanks in advance

Originally created by @aaronjoeldev on GitHub (Apr 24, 2025). Hey, I have successfully installed Pangolin on my VPS. My current goal is to be able to use my HomeLab services remotely from my iPhone. Since there is currently no Newt solution for the iPhone, I am using Wireguard. I would like to use the rules of Pangolin to whitelist the IP of the iPhone in the VPN. However, my current problem is that with the standard Wireguard config from Gerbil, the traffic is not routed via the VPS and therefore the iPhone does not receive the VPS IP. I have tried to set allowedIPs to 0.0.0.0/0 so that all traffic goes through the VPS. However, I then no longer have an internet connection. My approach is now to adjust this via NAT Config on the VPS. Unfortunately, all my attempts so far have been unsuccessful. Is there a specific approach to the Pangolin setup with Gerbil to achieve this? Thanks in advance
GiteaMirror added the stale label 2025-11-13 11:54:54 -06:00
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-13 11:54:56 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@oschwartz10612 commented on GitHub (Apr 24, 2025):

Hi!

This is not really a prescribed use case. Gerbil is meant really to accept connections to allow Traefik to access things on the other end of the tunnel. It is not a general purpose WG server where you can connect peer to peer. The automation will not work that way.

That being said we are working on a client VPN solution that will allow you to connect back to your newt at home with wireguard. That is in progress but should be out in a couple of weeks. It might not work on mobile at first but we could look into quick solutions to that.

I think your best bet right now would be to put a wireguard server at home and use pangolin to expose the udp traffic to it so you can connect back home.

@oschwartz10612 commented on GitHub (Apr 24, 2025): Hi! This is not really a prescribed use case. Gerbil is meant really to accept connections to allow Traefik to access things on the other end of the tunnel. It is not a general purpose WG server where you can connect peer to peer. The automation will not work that way. That being said we are working on a client VPN solution that will allow you to connect back to your newt at home with wireguard. That is in progress but should be out in a couple of weeks. It might not work on mobile at first but we could look into quick solutions to that. I think your best bet right now would be to put a wireguard server at home and use pangolin to expose the udp traffic to it so you can connect back home.
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-13 11:54:56 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (May 9, 2025):

This issue has been automatically marked as stale due to 14 days of inactivity. It will be closed in 14 days if no further activity occurs.

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (May 9, 2025): This issue has been automatically marked as stale due to 14 days of inactivity. It will be closed in 14 days if no further activity occurs.
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-13 11:54:56 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (May 24, 2025):

This issue has been automatically closed due to inactivity. If you believe this is still relevant, please open a new issue with up-to-date information.

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (May 24, 2025): This issue has been automatically closed due to inactivity. If you believe this is still relevant, please open a new issue with up-to-date information.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
api
authentication
bug
config
dependencies
docker
documentation
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
Improvement
Look Into
needs investigating
networking
new feature
non-critical bug
potential bug
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 question
reverse proxy
Security
stale
ui
No Label stale
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
GiteaMirror ninjasurge
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/pangolin#265
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?