[GH-ISSUE #1142] Can I run on port 9443 instead of 443? #1779

New Issue

GiteaMirror · 2026-04-16T08:35:57-05:00

GiteaMirror commented

2026-04-16 08:35:57 -05:00

Originally created by @bodleytunes on GitHub (Jul 27, 2025).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/fosrl/pangolin/issues/1142

Hi

I already have a Gravitational Teleport server running on 443 so tried to use 9443:443 in the docker compsoe file, it seems to work in the UI but when I create a subdomain and resouce I'm getting "unauthorized" when hitting the resource.

The resource / client end is connecting fine and showing up.

Wondering if some other config needs changing to tell it that the public port is now 9443 forwarding in to 443 via docker?

Thanks,

Jon.

Originally created by @bodleytunes on GitHub (Jul 27, 2025). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/fosrl/pangolin/issues/1142 Hi I already have a Gravitational Teleport server running on 443 so tried to use 9443:443 in the docker compsoe file, it seems to work in the UI but when I create a subdomain and resouce I'm getting "unauthorized" when hitting the resource. The resource / client end is connecting fine and showing up. Wondering if some other config needs changing to tell it that the public port is now 9443 forwarding in to 443 via docker? Thanks, Jon.

GiteaMirror added the stale label 2026-04-16 08:35:57 -05:00

GiteaMirror closed this issue

2026-04-16 08:35:58 -05:00

GiteaMirror commented

2026-04-16 08:36:00 -05:00

@Error-Gap commented on GitHub (Jul 31, 2025):

FYI, I was also trying to do the same and for similar reasons (existing webserver running on :443) but there were some places in the code that didn't like alternate ports.

See https://github.com/fosrl/pangolin/issues/1133

(Just submitted the PR, so should be doable soon if the pull is accepted to this project)

@Error-Gap commented on GitHub (Jul 31, 2025): FYI, I was also trying to do the same and for similar reasons (existing webserver running on :443) but there were some places in the code that didn't like alternate ports. See https://github.com/fosrl/pangolin/issues/1133 (Just submitted the PR, so should be doable soon if the pull is accepted to this project)

GiteaMirror commented

2026-04-16 08:36:01 -05:00

@bodleytunes commented on GitHub (Jul 31, 2025):

Ok great!
Regards,
Jon.

On Thu, 31 Jul 2025 at 05:45, Error-Gap @.***> wrote:

Error-Gap left a comment (fosrl/pangolin#1142)
https://github.com/fosrl/pangolin/issues/1142#issuecomment-3138545677

FYI, I was also trying to do the same and for similar reasons (existing
webserver running on :443) but there were some places in the code that
didn't like alternate ports.

See #1133 https://github.com/fosrl/pangolin/issues/1133

(Just submitted the PR, so should be doable soon if the pull is accepted
to this project)

—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/fosrl/pangolin/issues/1142#issuecomment-3138545677,
or unsubscribe
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAEXFZ6GVBTI7WRUZKJHFQD3LGNNXAVCNFSM6AAAAACCPGW4H6VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZTCMZYGU2DKNRXG4
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
@.***>

@bodleytunes commented on GitHub (Jul 31, 2025): Ok great! Regards, Jon. On Thu, 31 Jul 2025 at 05:45, Error-Gap ***@***.***> wrote: > *Error-Gap* left a comment (fosrl/pangolin#1142) > <https://github.com/fosrl/pangolin/issues/1142#issuecomment-3138545677> > > FYI, I was also trying to do the same and for similar reasons (existing > webserver running on :443) but there were some places in the code that > didn't like alternate ports. > > See #1133 <https://github.com/fosrl/pangolin/issues/1133> > > (Just submitted the PR, so should be doable soon if the pull is accepted > to this project) > > — > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/fosrl/pangolin/issues/1142#issuecomment-3138545677>, > or unsubscribe > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAEXFZ6GVBTI7WRUZKJHFQD3LGNNXAVCNFSM6AAAAACCPGW4H6VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZTCMZYGU2DKNRXG4> > . > You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: > ***@***.***> >

GiteaMirror commented

2026-04-16 08:36:02 -05:00

@miloschwartz commented on GitHub (Sep 27, 2025):

Traefik needs to run on 443/80 to work because it expects to serve resources via HTTPS and terminate SSL

@miloschwartz commented on GitHub (Sep 27, 2025): Traefik needs to run on 443/80 to work because it expects to serve resources via HTTPS and terminate SSL

GiteaMirror commented

2026-04-16 08:36:04 -05:00

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Oct 12, 2025):

This issue has been automatically marked as stale due to 14 days of inactivity. It will be closed in 14 days if no further activity occurs.

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Oct 12, 2025): This issue has been automatically marked as stale due to 14 days of inactivity. It will be closed in 14 days if no further activity occurs.

GiteaMirror commented

2026-04-16 08:36:06 -05:00

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Oct 26, 2025):

This issue has been automatically closed due to inactivity. If you believe this is still relevant, please open a new issue with up-to-date information.

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Oct 26, 2025): This issue has been automatically closed due to inactivity. If you believe this is still relevant, please open a new issue with up-to-date information.

GiteaMirror referenced this issue

2026-04-16 09:33:39 -05:00

[PR #1779] [MERGED] Bump eslint-config-next from 15.5.6 to 16.0.1 #2706

GiteaMirror referenced this issue

2026-04-20 09:00:32 -05:00

[PR #1779] [MERGED] Bump eslint-config-next from 15.5.6 to 16.0.1 #4649

GiteaMirror referenced this issue

2026-04-23 02:39:37 -05:00

[PR #1779] [MERGED] Bump eslint-config-next from 15.5.6 to 16.0.1 #5593

GiteaMirror referenced this issue

2026-04-25 16:16:42 -05:00

[PR #1779] [MERGED] Bump eslint-config-next from 15.5.6 to 16.0.1 #7508