Originally created by @wogam on GitHub (Aug 12, 2025).
Check Existing Issues
I have searched the existing issues and discussions.
Problem Description
Currently, there are two landing page styles available: "chat" and "default". The "default" style centers the chat box on the web page, providing an aesthetically pleasing layout for desktop applications. Conversely, the "chat" style places the chat box at the bottom of the screen, offering better functionality for mobile users, particularly on larger devices due to thumb reach considerations.
However, the current limitation is that only one style can be set across all platforms. It would be beneficial to have an option allowing separate configurations for different devices: "default" for desktop viewing and "chat" for mobile viewing. This would provide an optimal experience for both types of users, maximizing usability and aesthetics on their respective platforms.
Desired Solution you'd like
It would be beneficial to have an option allowing separate configurations for different devices: "default" for desktop viewing and "chat" for mobile viewing. This would provide an optimal experience for both types of users, maximizing usability and aesthetics on their respective platforms.
Alternatives Considered
No response
Additional Context
This solution would make the interface in line with current large language model providers such as ChatGPT or Anthropic.
Originally created by @wogam on GitHub (Aug 12, 2025).
### Check Existing Issues
- [x] I have searched the existing issues and discussions.
### Problem Description
Currently, there are two landing page styles available: "chat" and "default". The "default" style centers the chat box on the web page, providing an aesthetically pleasing layout for desktop applications. Conversely, the "chat" style places the chat box at the bottom of the screen, offering better functionality for mobile users, particularly on larger devices due to thumb reach considerations.
However, the current limitation is that only one style can be set across all platforms. It would be beneficial to have an option allowing separate configurations for different devices: "default" for desktop viewing and "chat" for mobile viewing. This would provide an optimal experience for both types of users, maximizing usability and aesthetics on their respective platforms.
### Desired Solution you'd like
It would be beneficial to have an option allowing separate configurations for different devices: "default" for desktop viewing and "chat" for mobile viewing. This would provide an optimal experience for both types of users, maximizing usability and aesthetics on their respective platforms.
### Alternatives Considered
_No response_
### Additional Context
This solution would make the interface in line with current large language model providers such as ChatGPT or Anthropic.
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Originally created by @wogam on GitHub (Aug 12, 2025).
Check Existing Issues
Problem Description
Currently, there are two landing page styles available: "chat" and "default". The "default" style centers the chat box on the web page, providing an aesthetically pleasing layout for desktop applications. Conversely, the "chat" style places the chat box at the bottom of the screen, offering better functionality for mobile users, particularly on larger devices due to thumb reach considerations.
However, the current limitation is that only one style can be set across all platforms. It would be beneficial to have an option allowing separate configurations for different devices: "default" for desktop viewing and "chat" for mobile viewing. This would provide an optimal experience for both types of users, maximizing usability and aesthetics on their respective platforms.
Desired Solution you'd like
It would be beneficial to have an option allowing separate configurations for different devices: "default" for desktop viewing and "chat" for mobile viewing. This would provide an optimal experience for both types of users, maximizing usability and aesthetics on their respective platforms.
Alternatives Considered
No response
Additional Context
This solution would make the interface in line with current large language model providers such as ChatGPT or Anthropic.