github-starred/open-webui
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui.git synced 2026-05-07 11:28:35 -05:00
Code Issues 1.3k Packages Projects Releases 126 Wiki Activity

[GH-ISSUE #19707] feat: Mistral OCR additional params #57626

New Issue
Open
opened 2026-05-05 21:15:17 -05:00 by GiteaMirror · 5 comments
GiteaMirror commented 2026-05-05 21:15:17 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @theobgbd on GitHub (Dec 3, 2025).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/issues/19707

Check Existing Issues

  • I have searched for all existing open AND closed issues and discussions for similar requests. I have found none that is comparable to my request.

Verify Feature Scope

  • I have read through and understood the scope definition for feature requests in the Issues section. I believe my feature request meets the definition and belongs in the Issues section instead of the Discussions.

Problem Description

Following #14200, the custom Mistral API endpoint had been introduced in version 0.6.35. This addition is a step in the right direction, however, its usage is heavily limited by the use of the /files endpoint interrogation method.

Desired Solution you'd like

Following the solution proposed by @paddy313 in PR #18905, a new set of parameters should be introduced (through the env variable MISTRAL_OCR_PARAMS), to manage the file transfer method, force the use of the /ocr endpoint, and provide options for the annotations and bbox features.

Alternatives Considered

No response

Additional Context

No response

Originally created by @theobgbd on GitHub (Dec 3, 2025). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/issues/19707 ### Check Existing Issues - [x] I have searched for all existing **open AND closed** issues and discussions for similar requests. I have found none that is comparable to my request. ### Verify Feature Scope - [x] I have read through and understood the scope definition for feature requests in the Issues section. I believe my feature request meets the definition and belongs in the Issues section instead of the Discussions. ### Problem Description Following #14200, the custom Mistral API endpoint had been introduced in version 0.6.35. This addition is a step in the right direction, however, its usage is heavily limited by the use of the /files endpoint interrogation method. ### Desired Solution you'd like Following the solution proposed by @paddy313 in PR #18905, a new set of parameters should be introduced (through the env variable MISTRAL_OCR_PARAMS), to manage the file transfer method, force the use of the /ocr endpoint, and provide options for the annotations and bbox features. ### Alternatives Considered _No response_ ### Additional Context _No response_
GiteaMirror commented 2026-05-05 21:15:20 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@owui-terminator[bot] commented on GitHub (Dec 3, 2025):

🔍 Similar Issues Found

I found some existing issues that might be related to this one. Please check if any of these are duplicates or contain helpful solutions:

  1. #17677 feat: custom endpoint for mistral ocr
    by ion-elgreco • Sep 23, 2025

  2. #14134 feat: Customized endpoint for Mistral OCR
    by tiangao88 • May 21, 2025

  3. #12035 feat: Support Mistral OCR
    by space192 • Mar 25, 2025

  4. #19649 feat: support dots.ocr for image analysis
    by Busboy3129 • Dec 01, 2025

💡 Tips:

  • If this is a duplicate, please consider closing this issue and adding any additional details to the existing one
  • If you found a solution in any of these issues, please share it here to help others

This comment was generated automatically by a bot. Please react with a 👍 if this comment was helpful, or a 👎 if it was not.

<!-- gh-comment-id:3605757357 --> @owui-terminator[bot] commented on GitHub (Dec 3, 2025): 🔍 **Similar Issues Found** I found some existing issues that might be related to this one. Please check if any of these are duplicates or contain helpful solutions: 1. [#17677](https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/issues/17677) **feat: custom endpoint for `mistral ocr`** *by ion-elgreco • Sep 23, 2025* 2. [#14134](https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/issues/14134) **feat: Customized endpoint for Mistral OCR** *by tiangao88 • May 21, 2025* 3. [#12035](https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/issues/12035) **feat: Support Mistral OCR** *by space192 • Mar 25, 2025* 4. [#19649](https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/issues/19649) **feat: support dots.ocr for image analysis** *by Busboy3129 • Dec 01, 2025* --- 💡 **Tips:** - If this is a duplicate, please consider closing this issue and adding any additional details to the existing one - If you found a solution in any of these issues, please share it here to help others *This comment was generated automatically by a bot.* Please react with a 👍 if this comment was helpful, or a 👎 if it was not.
GiteaMirror commented 2026-05-05 21:15:20 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@JARZcorp commented on GitHub (Dec 3, 2025):

Would be very much appreciated especially to allow for Azure Mistral OCR endpoints

<!-- gh-comment-id:3606907830 --> @JARZcorp commented on GitHub (Dec 3, 2025): Would be very much appreciated especially to allow for Azure Mistral OCR endpoints
GiteaMirror commented 2026-05-05 21:15:21 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@tiangao88 commented on GitHub (Dec 14, 2025):

I confirm that being able to use /ocr endpoint for Azure AI Foundry (which is supported by LiteLLM) is a real need and would push further the usage of OpenWebUI with organizations who want tight control on their data. #14200

@paddy313 can you help us out please?

<!-- gh-comment-id:3650314022 --> @tiangao88 commented on GitHub (Dec 14, 2025): I confirm that being able to use /ocr endpoint for Azure AI Foundry (which is supported by LiteLLM) is a real need and would push further the usage of OpenWebUI with organizations who want tight control on their data. [#14200](https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/discussions/14200#discussioncomment-14960935) @paddy313 can you help us out please?
GiteaMirror commented 2026-05-05 21:15:21 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@KevinRohn commented on GitHub (Dec 24, 2025):

I opened a PR for this - see #20126

<!-- gh-comment-id:3689861482 --> @KevinRohn commented on GitHub (Dec 24, 2025): I opened a PR for this - see #20126
GiteaMirror commented 2026-05-05 21:15:22 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@tiangao88 commented on GitHub (Dec 25, 2025):

I opened a PR for this - see #20126

That is a nice Xmas gift. Thank you @KevinRohn

<!-- gh-comment-id:3691283650 --> @tiangao88 commented on GitHub (Dec 25, 2025): > I opened a PR for this - see [#20126](https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/pull/20126) That is a nice Xmas gift. Thank you @KevinRohn
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
bug
confirmed
confirmed issue
core
documentation
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
non-core
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 python
question
testing wanted
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
GiteaMirror ninjasurge
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/open-webui#57626
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?