Originally created by @thistleknot on GitHub (Feb 21, 2025).
Feature Request
Describe the solution you'd like
I can edit any response (whether user or llm), but I can't get the llm to continue it's own response if I edit it. I'm not sure if this is even possible with the way the chat messages are likely being processed (I am familiar with the process). What I'm proposing is sending an assistant message back to the llm to continue more or less (after it's been edited).
Describe alternatives you've considered
Current alternative is to edit the llm response, and then start a user response after this edit.
Originally created by @thistleknot on GitHub (Feb 21, 2025).
# Feature Request
**Describe the solution you'd like**
I can edit any response (whether user or llm), but I can't get the llm to continue it's own response if I edit it. I'm not sure if this is even possible with the way the chat messages are likely being processed (I am familiar with the process). What I'm proposing is sending an assistant message back to the llm to continue more or less (after it's been edited).
**Describe alternatives you've considered**
Current alternative is to edit the llm response, and then start a user response after this edit.
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Originally created by @thistleknot on GitHub (Feb 21, 2025).
Feature Request
Describe the solution you'd like
I can edit any response (whether user or llm), but I can't get the llm to continue it's own response if I edit it. I'm not sure if this is even possible with the way the chat messages are likely being processed (I am familiar with the process). What I'm proposing is sending an assistant message back to the llm to continue more or less (after it's been edited).
Describe alternatives you've considered
Current alternative is to edit the llm response, and then start a user response after this edit.