mirror of
https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui.git
synced 2026-05-06 19:08:59 -05:00
[GH-ISSUE #20188] issue: unable to update using uv #34646
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Delete Branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @Drknght4 on GitHub (Dec 26, 2025).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/issues/20188
Check Existing Issues
Installation Method
Git Clone
Open WebUI Version
v0.6.43
Ollama Version (if applicable)
No response
Operating System
proxmox
Browser (if applicable)
No response
Confirmation
README.md.Expected Behavior
should update
Actual Behavior
not able to update to new version in proxmox using UV
get error "nothing to upgrade"
Steps to Reproduce
in LXC, typed: uv tool upgrade --python 3.12 open-webui[all], received : Nothing to upgrade
Logs & Screenshots
root@openwebui:
# uv tool upgrade --python 3.12 open-webui[all]# uv tool update --allNothing to upgrade
root@openwebui:
Nothing to upgrade
root@openwebui:~#
Additional Information
No response
@owui-terminator[bot] commented on GitHub (Dec 26, 2025):
🔍 Similar Issues Found
I found some existing issues that might be related to this one. Please check if any of these are duplicates or contain helpful solutions:
#19877 issue:
by dotmobo • Dec 11, 2025 •
bug#19861 issue:
by QuitHub • Dec 10, 2025 •
bug#20046 issue:
by pierrelouisbescond • Dec 19, 2025 •
bug#20019 issue:
by j63440490 • Dec 17, 2025 •
bug#20092 issue:
by VideoRyan • Dec 22, 2025 •
bugShow 5 more related issues
#19777 issue:
by Yaute7 • Dec 05, 2025 •
bug#19864 issue:
by Haervwe • Dec 10, 2025 •
bug#15922 issue: Cannot update to version 0.6.18 using uv sync
by poonesh • Jul 22, 2025 •
bug#14440 issue:
by ehsan8203 • May 28, 2025 •
bug#19563 issue:
by naruto7g • Nov 28, 2025 •
bug💡 Tips:
This comment was generated automatically by a bot. Please react with a 👍 if this comment was helpful, or a 👎 if it was not.
@publikummedia commented on GitHub (Dec 27, 2025):
Check #20117
@Classic298 commented on GitHub (Dec 27, 2025):
Fixed in dev thanks