Issue: Multi-model chats not taking up full width resulting in bad user experience #2782

New Issue

2025-11-11T15:14:17-06:00

GiteaMirror commented

2025-11-11 15:14:17 -06:00

Originally created by @hg0428 on GitHub (Nov 22, 2024).

It would be a much better user experience if chats with more than one model could expand to take up the full width. With 2-3 models the width of each model's response is compacted to fit multiple. With 4+ models it has to scroll. However, it would be better to increase the width of these responses to take up the available space. Or, at least have the option to do so. Perhaps a customizable width, allowing you to scroll if you want would be best. So, you could use the full width to fit all 4 side by side, or have each one be full size individually and scroll through them.

Originally created by @hg0428 on GitHub (Nov 22, 2024). <img width="1507" alt="Screenshot 2024-11-22 at 12 54 08" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d4e0a6da-cb4a-4c41-b073-f550102478c2"> It would be a much better user experience if chats with more than one model could expand to take up the full width. With 2-3 models the width of each model's response is compacted to fit multiple. With 4+ models it has to scroll. However, it would be better to increase the width of these responses to take up the available space. Or, at least have the option to do so. Perhaps a customizable width, allowing you to scroll if you want would be best. So, you could use the full width to fit all 4 side by side, or have each one be full size individually and scroll through them.

GiteaMirror closed this issue

2025-11-11 15:14:17 -06:00

GiteaMirror commented

2025-11-11 15:14:17 -06:00

@hg0428 commented on GitHub (Nov 22, 2024):

@tjbck Could you let me know why this is not planned? Thanks.

@hg0428 commented on GitHub (Nov 22, 2024): @tjbck Could you let me know why this is not planned? Thanks.

GiteaMirror commented

2025-11-11 15:14:18 -06:00

@hg0428 commented on GitHub (Nov 22, 2024):

It would be great if this was at least saved for the future, even if it is not currently planned.

@hg0428 commented on GitHub (Nov 22, 2024): It would be great if this was at least saved for the future, even if it is not currently planned.

GiteaMirror commented

2025-11-11 15:14:18 -06:00

@etlweather commented on GitHub (Dec 11, 2024):

Definitely, would be much more usable to do comparison!

@etlweather commented on GitHub (Dec 11, 2024): Definitely, would be much more usable to do comparison!