github-starred/open-webui
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui.git synced 2026-05-08 04:16:03 -05:00
Code Issues 1.3k Packages Projects Releases 126 Wiki Activity

[GH-ISSUE #529] feat: collections/docs for modelfiles with models #27635

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-04-25 02:22:45 -05:00 by GiteaMirror · 11 comments
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-25 02:22:45 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @racso-dev on GitHub (Jan 19, 2024).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/issues/529

Originally assigned to: @tjbck on GitHub.

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
It's frustrating having to mention documents manually every time.

Describe the solution you'd like
It would be nice to have a RAG integration inside the Modelfiles definition.
OpenAI and their GPTs allow users to activate RAG and upload documents upon creation of a new GPT.
It would be really amazing to have such a feature ;)

Originally created by @racso-dev on GitHub (Jan 19, 2024). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/issues/529 Originally assigned to: @tjbck on GitHub. **Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.** It's frustrating having to mention documents manually every time. **Describe the solution you'd like** It would be nice to have a RAG integration inside the Modelfiles definition. OpenAI and their GPTs allow users to activate RAG and upload documents upon creation of a new GPT. It would be really amazing to have such a feature ;)
GiteaMirror added the enhancementcore labels 2026-04-25 02:22:45 -05:00
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-25 02:22:46 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@JasonPad19 commented on GitHub (Jan 26, 2024):

yes, looking at GenAI stack from docker,neo4j.

I am looking for a way to integrate a neo4j knowledge graph which has structured data and RAG pdf chunk data.

<!-- gh-comment-id:1912545578 --> @JasonPad19 commented on GitHub (Jan 26, 2024): yes, looking at GenAI stack from docker,neo4j. I am looking for a way to integrate a neo4j knowledge graph which has structured data and RAG pdf chunk data.
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-25 02:22:47 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@racso-dev commented on GitHub (Feb 29, 2024):

Any plans on that feature?

<!-- gh-comment-id:1971431292 --> @racso-dev commented on GitHub (Feb 29, 2024): Any plans on that feature?
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-25 02:22:47 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@MarlNox commented on GitHub (Mar 5, 2024):

What's the approach? I'm also very interested in this feature. If there's a roadmap, id be glad to help realize it.

<!-- gh-comment-id:1978734943 --> @MarlNox commented on GitHub (Mar 5, 2024): What's the approach? I'm also very interested in this feature. If there's a roadmap, id be glad to help realize it.
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-25 02:22:48 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@tjbck commented on GitHub (Mar 5, 2024):

Blockers: #665

<!-- gh-comment-id:1979137967 --> @tjbck commented on GitHub (Mar 5, 2024): Blockers: #665
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-25 02:22:48 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@pspeskoett commented on GitHub (Apr 25, 2024):

This is really what is missing right now to make the assistent setup really great

<!-- gh-comment-id:2077076202 --> @pspeskoett commented on GitHub (Apr 25, 2024): This is really what is missing right now to make the assistent setup really great
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-25 02:22:49 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@flefevre commented on GitHub (May 7, 2024):

How can I help? Is there any test to perform?

<!-- gh-comment-id:2097199110 --> @flefevre commented on GitHub (May 7, 2024): How can I help? Is there any test to perform?
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-25 02:22:49 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@racso-dev commented on GitHub (Jun 7, 2024):

Any news on that?

<!-- gh-comment-id:2154212993 --> @racso-dev commented on GitHub (Jun 7, 2024): Any news on that?
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-25 02:22:50 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@tjbck commented on GitHub (Jun 8, 2024):

I'll prioritise this feature for v0.4.0!

<!-- gh-comment-id:2155851075 --> @tjbck commented on GitHub (Jun 8, 2024): I'll prioritise this feature for v0.4.0!
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-25 02:22:50 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@flefevre commented on GitHub (Jun 9, 2024):

Hello Timothy,
That will be great but I think it should be associated with

-Enabling multi workspaces
-A workspace could have its own models, documents ,prompts.
-A workspace should be associated with its own embedded vector database base
-a workspace could be accessed by a group of users, thanks to the creator
and the managers of a workspace.

Hope we could discuss about these features.

And once again, 'BRAVO' for your project.

François, from France

Le sam. 8 juin 2024, 09:18, Timothy Jaeryang Baek @.***>
a écrit :

I'll prioritise this feature for v0.4.0!

—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/issues/529#issuecomment-2155851075,
or unsubscribe
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABKZRFHNWFHMSTOMNJ3WJV3ZGKV3VAVCNFSM6AAAAABCCCQZ2CVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDCNJVHA2TCMBXGU
.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
@.***>

<!-- gh-comment-id:2156796155 --> @flefevre commented on GitHub (Jun 9, 2024): Hello Timothy, That will be great but I think it should be associated with -Enabling multi workspaces -A workspace could have its own models, documents ,prompts. -A workspace should be associated with its own embedded vector database base -a workspace could be accessed by a group of users, thanks to the creator and the managers of a workspace. Hope we could discuss about these features. And once again, 'BRAVO' for your project. François, from France Le sam. 8 juin 2024, 09:18, Timothy Jaeryang Baek ***@***.***> a écrit : > I'll prioritise this feature for v0.4.0! > > — > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/issues/529#issuecomment-2155851075>, > or unsubscribe > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABKZRFHNWFHMSTOMNJ3WJV3ZGKV3VAVCNFSM6AAAAABCCCQZ2CVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDCNJVHA2TCMBXGU> > . > You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: > ***@***.***> >
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-25 02:22:51 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@tjbck commented on GitHub (Jun 10, 2024):

Implemented on dev!
image

<!-- gh-comment-id:2156930691 --> @tjbck commented on GitHub (Jun 10, 2024): Implemented on dev! ![image](https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/assets/25473318/50130791-5558-437b-b832-7f7fd3f5a816)
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-25 02:22:51 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@amrsa1 commented on GitHub (Oct 13, 2024):

I have attached very basic pdf and link it to relevant model llma 3.2 8b and adjust the emeddings model to nomic.

And for some reasons lllm in unable to give relevant answers ??

Am i missing anything ?

<!-- gh-comment-id:2409111502 --> @amrsa1 commented on GitHub (Oct 13, 2024): I have attached very basic pdf and link it to relevant model llma 3.2 8b and adjust the emeddings model to nomic. And for some reasons lllm in unable to give relevant answers ?? Am i missing anything ?
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
bug
confirmed
confirmed issue
core
documentation
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
non-core
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 python
question
testing wanted
No Label core enhancement
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
GiteaMirror ninjasurge
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/open-webui#27635
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?