github-starred/open-webui
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui.git synced 2026-05-06 19:08:59 -05:00
Code Issues 1.3k Packages Projects Releases 126 Wiki Activity

[GH-ISSUE #23883] feat: followup questions should be useful #20096

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-04-20 02:40:52 -05:00 by GiteaMirror · 1 comment
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-20 02:40:52 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @oatmealm on GitHub (Apr 19, 2026).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/issues/23883

Check Existing Issues

  • I have searched for all existing open AND closed issues and discussions for similar requests. I have found none that is comparable to my request.

Verify Feature Scope

  • I have read through and understood the scope definition for feature requests in the Issues section. I believe my feature request meets the definition and belongs in the Issues section instead of the Discussions.

Problem Description

Followup questions are often questions to which the answer is negative.

Image

Desired Solution you'd like

Follow-up questions should be designed to surface information the user might find interesting or relevant and allow them to better explore the sources.

Alternatives Considered

No response

Additional Context

I find it frustrating using followup questions in text I’m not familiar with only to be told the text doesn’t provide an answer to the questions suggested to me as a followup. I’m expecting followup questions to help explore the text beyond what I’ve asked and surface what I might have missed.

Originally created by @oatmealm on GitHub (Apr 19, 2026). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/issues/23883 ### Check Existing Issues - [x] I have searched for all existing **open AND closed** issues and discussions for similar requests. I have found none that is comparable to my request. ### Verify Feature Scope - [x] I have read through and understood the scope definition for feature requests in the Issues section. I believe my feature request meets the definition and belongs in the Issues section instead of the Discussions. ### Problem Description Followup questions are often questions to which the answer is negative. <img width="1320" height="2868" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/992f76e3-d8ab-44f0-8216-db976677919c" /> ### Desired Solution you'd like Follow-up questions should be designed to surface information the user might find interesting or relevant and allow them to better explore the sources. ### Alternatives Considered _No response_ ### Additional Context I find it frustrating using followup questions in text I’m not familiar with only to be told the text doesn’t provide an answer to the questions suggested to me as a followup. I’m expecting followup questions to help explore the text beyond what I’ve asked and surface what I might have missed.
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-20 02:40:54 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@Classic298 commented on GitHub (Apr 19, 2026):

You can easily change the prompt for the follow up questions in the admin panel to adjust it to your liking

<!-- gh-comment-id:4276805185 --> @Classic298 commented on GitHub (Apr 19, 2026): You can easily change the prompt for the follow up questions in the admin panel to adjust it to your liking
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
bug
confirmed
confirmed issue
core
documentation
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
non-core
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 python
question
testing wanted
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
GiteaMirror ninjasurge
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/open-webui#20096
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?