[GH-ISSUE #18488] After logging in, the left nav is stuck loading #18612

New Issue

GiteaMirror · 2026-04-20T00:49:38-05:00

GiteaMirror commented

2026-04-20 00:49:38 -05:00

Originally created by @pekrockstar on GitHub (Oct 21, 2025).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/issues/18488

7a83e7dfa3/src/lib/components/chat/Navbar.svelte (L204)

This part should be changed like this:

 {#if $user?.role === 'admin' || ($user?.permissions?.chat?.controls ?? true)}

permissions.chat? change to permissions?.chat?

Originally created by @pekrockstar on GitHub (Oct 21, 2025). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/issues/18488 https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/blob/7a83e7dfa367d19f762ec17cac5e4a94ea2bd97d/src/lib/components/chat/Navbar.svelte#L204 This part should be changed like this: ```javascript {#if $user?.role === 'admin' || ($user?.permissions?.chat?.controls ?? true)} ``` `permissions.chat?` change to `permissions?.chat?`

GiteaMirror closed this issue

2026-04-20 00:49:38 -05:00

GiteaMirror commented

2026-04-20 00:49:39 -05:00

@silentoplayz commented on GitHub (Oct 21, 2025):

More info is wanted here. Why is this change needed?

{#if $user?.role === 'admin' || ($user?.permissions.chat?.controls ?? true)} can also be found in src/lib/components/chat/Controls/Controls.svelte. Does that not need changed from permissions.chat? to permissions?.chat? as well?

@silentoplayz commented on GitHub (Oct 21, 2025): More info is wanted here. Why is this change needed? `{#if $user?.role === 'admin' || ($user?.permissions.chat?.controls ?? true)}` can also be found in `src/lib/components/chat/Controls/Controls.svelte`. Does that not need changed from `permissions.chat?` to `permissions?.chat?` as well?

GiteaMirror commented

2026-04-20 00:49:40 -05:00

@rgaricano commented on GitHub (Oct 21, 2025):

No, that change isn't neccessary, permissions are explicit for users, if user exists then user.permissions too.

@rgaricano commented on GitHub (Oct 21, 2025): No, that change isn't neccessary, permissions are explicit for users, if user exists then user.permissions too.

GiteaMirror commented

2026-04-20 00:49:40 -05:00

@pekrockstar commented on GitHub (Oct 21, 2025):

Yes, all {#if $user?.role === 'admin' || ($user?.permissions.chat?.controls ?? true)} need to be changed to {#if $user?.role === 'admin' || ($user?.permissions.chat?.controls ?? true)}, otherwise Uncaught (in promise) TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'chat') error will be reported.

After logging in, the first thing I noticed was that the menu on the left kept loading, and the other errors could only be found after clicking into the corresponding pages.

@pekrockstar commented on GitHub (Oct 21, 2025): Yes, all `{#if $user?.role === 'admin' || ($user?.permissions.chat?.controls ?? true)}` need to be changed to ` {#if $user?.role === 'admin' || ($user?.permissions.chat?.controls ?? true)}`, otherwise `Uncaught (in promise) TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'chat')` error will be reported. <img width="687" height="64" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f26c65c4-d9c2-425e-9039-3165543b0e0d" /> After logging in, the first thing I noticed was that the menu on the left kept loading, and the other errors could only be found after clicking into the corresponding pages.

GiteaMirror commented

2026-04-20 00:49:41 -05:00

@pekrockstar commented on GitHub (Oct 21, 2025):

No, that change isn't neccessary, permissions are explicit for users, if user exists then user.permissions too.

yes,that change isn't necessary, If you have not customized other login methods, because the previous auths.py code does not have return permissions field, this should be the latest newly added field, THANKS ALL!

@pekrockstar commented on GitHub (Oct 21, 2025): > No, that change isn't neccessary, permissions are explicit for users, if user exists then user.permissions too. yes,that change isn't necessary, If you have not customized other login methods, because the previous `auths.py` code does not have return `permissions` field, this should be the latest newly added field, THANKS ALL!

GiteaMirror referenced this issue

2026-04-20 00:51:50 -05:00

[GH-ISSUE #18612] feat: Refactor and Improve Tools System #18651

GiteaMirror referenced this issue

2026-04-25 08:05:47 -05:00

[GH-ISSUE #18612] feat: Refactor and Improve Tools System #34180

GiteaMirror referenced this issue

2026-05-05 20:51:00 -05:00

[GH-ISSUE #18612] feat: Refactor and Improve Tools System #57317

Sign in to join this conversation.