[GH-ISSUE #10887] 500: Internal Error #16065

Closed
opened 2026-04-19 22:05:45 -05:00 by GiteaMirror · 82 comments
Owner

Originally created by @peter-ch on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/issues/10887

I upgraded to version 0.5.17 and all I see is 500: Internal Error now, nothing else. Clearing the cache, reinstalling with --force-reinstall didn't fix it.

Originally created by @peter-ch on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/issues/10887 I upgraded to version 0.5.17 and all I see is 500: Internal Error now, nothing else. Clearing the cache, reinstalling with --force-reinstall didn't fix it.
Author
Owner

@1zilc commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

same here!

Image

<!-- gh-comment-id:2687835975 --> @1zilc commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): same here! ![Image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9da25cce-9949-4438-80de-8a0303234390)
Author
Owner

@jmio23 commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

+1

Also noticed it is downloading files from GitHub every time it starts, I don't think this should be happening ?

<!-- gh-comment-id:2687838287 --> @jmio23 commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): +1 Also noticed it is downloading files from GitHub every time it starts, I don't think this should be happening ?
Author
Owner

@fti7 commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

Same here. No Errors in Log

<!-- gh-comment-id:2687842276 --> @fti7 commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): Same here. No Errors in Log
Author
Owner

@galvanoid commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

Same here, 500: internal error.

<!-- gh-comment-id:2687846536 --> @galvanoid commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): Same here, 500: internal error.
Author
Owner

@peyloride commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

Same here, lost 1 hour because of this

<!-- gh-comment-id:2687856806 --> @peyloride commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): Same here, lost 1 hour because of this
Author
Owner

@HougeLangley commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

Image
<!-- gh-comment-id:2687857423 --> @HougeLangley commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): <img width="1150" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/eea6444a-ab83-4e6c-98f2-d130bc4a0a73" />
Author
Owner

@lyp49472060 commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

+1

<!-- gh-comment-id:2687858993 --> @lyp49472060 commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): +1
Author
Owner

@zyh1994 commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

I have the same problem, but i roll bak to v0.5.16, the question does not appear. so i think that the version 0.5.17 has some problem, it needs to be fixed

<!-- gh-comment-id:2687861181 --> @zyh1994 commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): I have the same problem, but i roll bak to v0.5.16, the question does not appear. so i think that the version 0.5.17 has some problem, it needs to be fixed
Author
Owner

@baptisterajaut commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

Checking in with same issue.
Admin access is still there for the record.
I've noticed openai was enabled without api key and was causing some 500, disabling openai integration did not fix the issue.
I tried disabling basically everything in the admin, to no change. (Including the onedrive integration that causes an error in the js console)
Cleared all browser caches, no change.
I'm using a pip installation, not docker.

<!-- gh-comment-id:2687863835 --> @baptisterajaut commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): Checking in with same issue. Admin access is still there for the record. I've noticed openai was enabled without api key and was causing some 500, disabling openai integration did not fix the issue. I tried disabling basically everything in the admin, to no change. (Including the onedrive integration that causes an error in the js console) Cleared all browser caches, no change. I'm using a pip installation, not docker.
Author
Owner

@lumitry commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

I'm on Docker install, getting same issue. Can't even log in as my admin account. Getting error in chrome devtools related to the onedrive file picker, it seems?

Image
<!-- gh-comment-id:2687872890 --> @lumitry commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): I'm on Docker install, getting same issue. Can't even log in as my admin account. Getting error in chrome devtools related to the onedrive file picker, it seems? <img width="547" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d5b5a0aa-1dba-44aa-b329-09acd8fdc46b" />
Author
Owner

@gaby commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

Ping @tjbck

<!-- gh-comment-id:2687876281 --> @gaby commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): Ping @tjbck
Author
Owner

@ycros commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

Ah, crypto.randomUUID only exists in a HTTPS (secure) context.

<!-- gh-comment-id:2687877483 --> @ycros commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): Ah, crypto.randomUUID only exists in a HTTPS (secure) context.
Author
Owner

@Yoshi-OOF commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

Same issue here

<!-- gh-comment-id:2687877961 --> @Yoshi-OOF commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): Same issue here
Author
Owner

@anomaly256 commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

haven't touched it for a few weeks and decided to upgrade 5 minutes ago, lucky timing 😄

<!-- gh-comment-id:2687909202 --> @anomaly256 commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): haven't touched it for a few weeks and decided to upgrade 5 minutes ago, lucky timing 😄
Author
Owner

@ghost commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

same issue

<!-- gh-comment-id:2687915512 --> @ghost commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): same issue
Author
Owner

@Tanamaz commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

same issue

<!-- gh-comment-id:2687918196 --> @Tanamaz commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): same issue
Author
Owner

@HougeLangley commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

The general process for updating openwebui is to check for a new version being pushed, and then wait for 3 hours to see if there are any new threads in the issues section before proceeding with the update.

<!-- gh-comment-id:2687919129 --> @HougeLangley commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): The general process for updating openwebui is to check for a new version being pushed, and then wait for 3 hours to see if there are any new threads in the issues section before proceeding with the update.
Author
Owner

@Iatbzh commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

+1

<!-- gh-comment-id:2687950061 --> @Iatbzh commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): +1
Author
Owner

@NikolasTh90 commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

Same issue here. The developers need to provide a fix as soon as possible @

<!-- gh-comment-id:2687959075 --> @NikolasTh90 commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): Same issue here. The developers need to provide a fix as soon as possible @
Author
Owner

@peter-ch commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

Reverting to .16 fixes it so I guess let's just wait for the maintainers to notice.

<!-- gh-comment-id:2687970092 --> @peter-ch commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): Reverting to .16 fixes it so I guess let's just wait for the maintainers to notice.
Author
Owner

@ollybrain commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

same issue

<!-- gh-comment-id:2687990021 --> @ollybrain commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): same issue
Author
Owner

@mtzortzis commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

Same issue. Are there any instructions on rolling back docker container?

<!-- gh-comment-id:2688005458 --> @mtzortzis commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): Same issue. Are there any instructions on rolling back docker container?
Author
Owner

@galvanoid commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

Same issue. Are there any instructions on rolling back docker container?

Recreate: ghcr.io/open-webui/open-webui:0.5.16

<!-- gh-comment-id:2688010194 --> @galvanoid commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): > Same issue. Are there any instructions on rolling back docker container? Recreate: ghcr.io/open-webui/open-webui:0.5.16
Author
Owner

@Iatbzh commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

+1

<!-- gh-comment-id:2688011135 --> @Iatbzh commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): +1
Author
Owner

@Fusili commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

Also having the same issue. It only happens on the chat page. If I manually type the address to any pages like /admin or /admin/settings, it will load that page. Still gives 500 error when navigating back to chat.

<!-- gh-comment-id:2688025459 --> @Fusili commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): Also having the same issue. It only happens on the chat page. If I manually type the address to any pages like /admin or /admin/settings, it will load that page. Still gives 500 error when navigating back to chat.
Author
Owner

@muslu commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

+2

<!-- gh-comment-id:2688028602 --> @muslu commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): +2
Author
Owner

@jadersimoes commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

Same issue here after updating through watchtower

<!-- gh-comment-id:2688043387 --> @jadersimoes commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): Same issue here after updating through watchtower
Author
Owner

@FengKeWG commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

+1

<!-- gh-comment-id:2688044754 --> @FengKeWG commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): +1
Author
Owner

@NikolasTh90 commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

Same issue. Are there any instructions on rolling back docker container?

Use image ghcr.io/open-webui/open-webui:0.5.16 instead of ghcr.io/open-webui/open-webui:main

<!-- gh-comment-id:2688046993 --> @NikolasTh90 commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): > Same issue. Are there any instructions on rolling back docker container? Use image ghcr.io/open-webui/open-webui:0.5.16 instead of ghcr.io/open-webui/open-webui:main
Author
Owner

@arty-hlr commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

Big big lack of testing on that one... or maybe generally

<!-- gh-comment-id:2688050343 --> @arty-hlr commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): Big big lack of testing on that one... or maybe generally
Author
Owner

@alaerock commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

Same issue. Are there any instructions on rolling back docker container?

Recreate: ghcr.io/open-webui/open-webui:0.5.16

or add WEBUI_DOCKER_TAG=0.5.16 to the .env file if used

<!-- gh-comment-id:2688057831 --> @alaerock commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): > > Same issue. Are there any instructions on rolling back docker container? > > Recreate: ghcr.io/open-webui/open-webui:0.5.16 or add `WEBUI_DOCKER_TAG=0.5.16` to the .env file if used
Author
Owner

@mtzortzis commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

Same issue. Are there any instructions on rolling back docker container?

Recreate: ghcr.io/open-webui/open-webui:0.5.16

or add WEBUI_DOCKER_TAG=0.5.16 to the .env file if used

not using a .env so I guess I'll have to recreate it, thank you

<!-- gh-comment-id:2688066540 --> @mtzortzis commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): > > > Same issue. Are there any instructions on rolling back docker container? > > > > > > Recreate: ghcr.io/open-webui/open-webui:0.5.16 > > or add `WEBUI_DOCKER_TAG=0.5.16` to the .env file if used not using a .env so I guess I'll have to recreate it, thank you
Author
Owner

@jhstatewide commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

Same issue here. The developers need to provide a fix as soon as possible @

Oh, I didn't realize you were paying for a support contract.

<!-- gh-comment-id:2688094125 --> @jhstatewide commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): > Same issue here. The developers need to provide a fix as soon as possible @ Oh, I didn't realize you were paying for a support contract.
Author
Owner

@ollybrain commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

Recreate: ghcr.io/open-webui/open-webui:0.5.16

Sounds nice, but how will it be with the GPU usage?

<!-- gh-comment-id:2688097267 --> @ollybrain commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): Recreate: ghcr.io/open-webui/open-webui:0.5.16 Sounds nice, but how will it be with the GPU usage?
Author
Owner

@jaceyang97 commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

+1 revert back to 0.5.16 solves the problem temporarily

<!-- gh-comment-id:2688130779 --> @jaceyang97 commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): +1 revert back to 0.5.16 solves the problem temporarily
Author
Owner

@arty-hlr commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

@ollybrain I made it with :0.5.16-cuda as a tag

<!-- gh-comment-id:2688132179 --> @arty-hlr commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): @ollybrain I made it with `:0.5.16-cuda` as a tag
Author
Owner

@ollybrain commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

@ollybrain I made it with :0.5.16-cuda as a tag

YES, it works. thank you very much for the quick support.

<!-- gh-comment-id:2688193108 --> @ollybrain commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): > [@ollybrain](https://github.com/ollybrain) I made it with `:0.5.16-cuda` as a tag YES, it works. thank you very much for the quick support.
Author
Owner

@gtfxing commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

DATA_DIR=CHANGEHERE TO YOUR DIR uvx --python 3.11 open-webui@0.5.16 serve
DATA_DIR=~/.open-webui uvx --python 3.11 open-webui@0.5.16 serve

<!-- gh-comment-id:2688223712 --> @gtfxing commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): DATA_DIR=CHANGEHERE TO YOUR DIR uvx --python 3.11 open-webui@0.5.16 serve DATA_DIR=~/.open-webui uvx --python 3.11 open-webui@0.5.16 serve
Author
Owner

@bailei951 commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

+1

<!-- gh-comment-id:2688294117 --> @bailei951 commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): +1
Author
Owner

@wqshmzh commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

SAME HERE

<!-- gh-comment-id:2688302190 --> @wqshmzh commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): SAME HERE
Author
Owner

@Kaliytor commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

+++++++++++1!

<!-- gh-comment-id:2688362712 --> @Kaliytor commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): +++++++++++1!
Author
Owner

@aspwebchh commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

+++++++++++++1

<!-- gh-comment-id:2688369615 --> @aspwebchh commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): +++++++++++++1
Author
Owner

@emrothenberg commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

Solving Error in v0.5.17 Using Ngrok (Bypass HTTPS)

Issue:

The error occurs because the application is running over HTTP without SSL encryption. This causes browsers and other clients to block access or show security warnings when trying to connect.

Workaround:

Using Ngrok, you can create a secure HTTPS tunnel to your local server. This also enables remote access to the service.

Steps:

  1. Sign Up for Ngrok

    • Go to Ngrok and create a free account.
  2. Download and Install Ngrok

    • Download the binary from the Ngrok website.
    • Extract and move it to a directory in your system's PATH for easy access.
  3. Authenticate Ngrok

    • Open a terminal and run:
      ngrok config add-authtoken YOUR_AUTH_TOKEN
      
    • Replace YOUR_AUTH_TOKEN with the authentication token provided in your Ngrok dashboard.
  4. Expose Local Server

    • Assuming your local application runs on port 3000, start an Ngrok tunnel with:
      ngrok http 3000
      
    • Ngrok will generate a secure HTTPS URL, such as:
      https://random-subdomain.ngrok.io
      
    • Copy this URL and use it instead of your local http://localhost:3000.

Benefits of This Method:

  • Bypasses HTTPS restrictions: Ngrok provides a valid SSL certificate.
  • Enables remote access: The server is now accessible from anywhere.
  • Easy to set up: Requires minimal configuration.

This method ensures you can access your application securely without modifying the backend to support SSL.

<!-- gh-comment-id:2688377059 --> @emrothenberg commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): # Solving Error in v0.5.17 Using Ngrok (Bypass HTTPS) ## Issue: The error occurs because the application is running over HTTP without SSL encryption. This causes browsers and other clients to block access or show security warnings when trying to connect. ## Workaround: Using **Ngrok**, you can create a secure HTTPS tunnel to your local server. This also enables remote access to the service. ## Steps: 1. **Sign Up for [Ngrok](https://ngrok.com/)** - Go to [Ngrok](https://ngrok.com/) and create a free account. 2. **Download and Install Ngrok** - Download the binary from the Ngrok website. - Extract and move it to a directory in your system's `PATH` for easy access. 3. **Authenticate Ngrok** - Open a terminal and run: ```sh ngrok config add-authtoken YOUR_AUTH_TOKEN ``` - Replace `YOUR_AUTH_TOKEN` with the authentication token provided in your Ngrok dashboard. 4. **Expose Local Server** - Assuming your local application runs on port `3000`, start an Ngrok tunnel with: ```sh ngrok http 3000 ``` - Ngrok will generate a secure HTTPS URL, such as: ``` https://random-subdomain.ngrok.io ``` - Copy this URL and use it instead of your local `http://localhost:3000`. ## Benefits of This Method: - **Bypasses HTTPS restrictions**: Ngrok provides a valid SSL certificate. - **Enables remote access**: The server is now accessible from anywhere. - **Easy to set up**: Requires minimal configuration. This method ensures you can access your application securely without modifying the backend to support SSL.
Author
Owner

@cl93a commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

Same issue

<!-- gh-comment-id:2688395220 --> @cl93a commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): Same issue
Author
Owner

@sunruichao commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

Same here, 500: internal error.

<!-- gh-comment-id:2688395780 --> @sunruichao commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): Same here, 500: internal error.
Author
Owner

@Kaliytor commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

I have the same problem, but i roll bak to v0.5.16, the question does not appear. so i think that the version 0.5.17 has some problem, it needs to be fixed

how to roll bak, I use rasp+openmidiavault+compose+docker, and I don't know how to download the older version

<!-- gh-comment-id:2688432003 --> @Kaliytor commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): > I have the same problem, but i roll bak to v0.5.16, the question does not appear. so i think that the version 0.5.17 has some problem, it needs to be fixed how to roll bak, I use rasp+openmidiavault+compose+docker, and I don't know how to download the older version
Author
Owner

@cupuyc1 commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

after update im having 500 error pls. fix it

<!-- gh-comment-id:2688437974 --> @cupuyc1 commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): after update im having 500 error pls. fix it
Author
Owner

@HougeLangley commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

I have the same problem, but i roll bak to v0.5.16, the question does not appear. so i think that the version 0.5.17 has some problem, it needs to be fixed

how to roll bak, I use rasp+openmidiavault+compose+docker, and I don't know how to download the older version

pip install open-webui==0.5.16 --force-reinstall

<!-- gh-comment-id:2688456397 --> @HougeLangley commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): > > I have the same problem, but i roll bak to v0.5.16, the question does not appear. so i think that the version 0.5.17 has some problem, it needs to be fixed > > how to roll bak, I use rasp+openmidiavault+compose+docker, and I don't know how to download the older version `pip install open-webui==0.5.16 --force-reinstall`
Author
Owner

@sdcgi commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

Same issue. Using Docker + watchtower, must be after an auto update. 0.5.17

<!-- gh-comment-id:2688472600 --> @sdcgi commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): Same issue. Using Docker + watchtower, must be after an auto update. 0.5.17
Author
Owner

@rabinnh commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

Same, broken release.

<!-- gh-comment-id:2688477804 --> @rabinnh commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): Same, broken release.
Author
Owner

@nonsleepr commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

I'm on Docker install, getting same issue. Can't even log in as my admin account. Getting error in chrome devtools related to the onedrive file picker, it seems?
Image

This is, indeed an issue with OneDrive when Open-WebUI is served via HTTP, @emrothenberg's workaround (or Tailscale's TLS in my case) resolves the issue.

<!-- gh-comment-id:2688487574 --> @nonsleepr commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): > I'm on Docker install, getting same issue. Can't even log in as my admin account. Getting error in chrome devtools related to the onedrive file picker, it seems? > <img alt="Image" width="547" src="https://private-user-images.githubusercontent.com/53492381/417598386-d5b5a0aa-1dba-44aa-b329-09acd8fdc46b.png?jwt=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.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.biIHO9QEg3sJY501fz4RgLQG1WLQj9IvYw0UHmSTPkg"> This is, indeed an issue with OneDrive when Open-WebUI is served via HTTP, @emrothenberg's [workaround](https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/issues/10887#issuecomment-2688377059) (or Tailscale's TLS in my case) resolves the issue.
Author
Owner

@melianor commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

Logging in through http://localhost:3000 works as it should.

As soon as one opens Open Webui with the IP address of the machine that has open webui running, the error 500: Internal Error is presented after login

Reproduce the error:

  1. Open "Open Webui" in your client browser using the IP address of the machine where Open Webui is currently running, like http://192.168.178.111:3000 instead of http://localhost:3000
  2. At the login screen enter your username, password
  3. Login is confirmed as successful, but the page below is presented
Image

So why does this work when opened through localhost, but not with IP ?

<!-- gh-comment-id:2688494235 --> @melianor commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): **Logging in through http://localhost:3000 works as it should.** As soon as one opens Open Webui with the IP address of the machine that has open webui running, the error 500: Internal Error is presented after login **Reproduce the error:** 1. Open "Open Webui" in your client browser using the IP address of the machine where Open Webui is currently running, like http://192.168.178.111:3000 instead of http://localhost:3000 2. At the login screen enter your username, password 3. Login is confirmed as successful, but the page below is presented <img width="1078" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0f5c7cb3-339d-4537-bfd1-d8f54d67b760" /> So why does this work when opened through localhost, but not with IP ?
Author
Owner

@qwerpoiugb commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

+1

<!-- gh-comment-id:2688517924 --> @qwerpoiugb commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): +1
Author
Owner

@qwerpoiugb commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

I have the same problem, but i roll bak to v0.5.16, the question does not appear. so i think that the version 0.5.17 has some problem, it needs to be fixed

how to roll bak, I use rasp+openmidiavault+compose+docker, and I don't know how to download the older version

pip install open-webui==0.5.16 --force-reinstall

thx

<!-- gh-comment-id:2688519877 --> @qwerpoiugb commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): > > > I have the same problem, but i roll bak to v0.5.16, the question does not appear. so i think that the version 0.5.17 has some problem, it needs to be fixed > > > > > > how to roll bak, I use rasp+openmidiavault+compose+docker, and I don't know how to download the older version > > `pip install open-webui==0.5.16 --force-reinstall` thx
Author
Owner

@sdcgi commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

Logging in through http://localhost:3000 works as it should.

As soon as one opens Open Webui with the IP address of the machine that has open webui running, the error 500: Internal Error is presented after login

Reproduce the error:

1. Open "Open Webui" in your client browser using the IP address of the machine where Open Webui is currently running, like http://192.168.178.111:3000 instead of http://localhost:3000

2. At the login screen enter your username, password

3. Login is confirmed as successful, but the page below is presented
Image

So why does this work when opened through localhost, but not with IP ?

localhost workarround confirmed

<!-- gh-comment-id:2688520359 --> @sdcgi commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): > **Logging in through http://localhost:3000 works as it should.** > > As soon as one opens Open Webui with the IP address of the machine that has open webui running, the error 500: Internal Error is presented after login > > **Reproduce the error:** > > 1. Open "Open Webui" in your client browser using the IP address of the machine where Open Webui is currently running, like http://192.168.178.111:3000 instead of http://localhost:3000 > > 2. At the login screen enter your username, password > > 3. Login is confirmed as successful, but the page below is presented > > > <img alt="Image" width="1078" src="https://private-user-images.githubusercontent.com/47601513/417691372-0f5c7cb3-339d-4537-bfd1-d8f54d67b760.png?jwt=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.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.15XzgmhkuM0P8Bg9a1HGU1G3F5t2i41SsqGcaAcEt1A"> > > So why does this work when opened through localhost, but not with IP ? localhost workarround confirmed
Author
Owner

@rabinnh commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

For those using the docker image, just change the docker "run" command to use the previous version. Instead of

ghcr.io/open-webui/open-webui:main

use:

ghcr.io/open-webui/open-webui:v0.5.16

<!-- gh-comment-id:2688521151 --> @rabinnh commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): For those using the docker image, just change the docker "run" command to use the previous version. Instead of `ghcr.io/open-webui/open-webui:main` use: `ghcr.io/open-webui/open-webui:v0.5.16`
Author
Owner

@washcontacnet1 commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

After update to 0.5.17, I had the same problem.

What I did

At Docker Stoped the container and click remove.

At CMD, the following prompts

1 - Reinstall version 0.5.16

pip install open-webui==0.5.16 --force-reinstall

2 - Force Docker to use the old version

docker run -d -p 3000:8080 -v open-webui:/app/backend/data --name open-webui ghcr.io/open-webui/open-webui:v0.5.16

And it's all, everything is works again.

NOTE: I tried to find the solution for 4 hours after identify the problem, the solution ahead works to me, if works to you too, let me know.

<!-- gh-comment-id:2688590681 --> @washcontacnet1 commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): After update to 0.5.17, I had the same problem. What I did At Docker Stoped the container and click remove. At CMD, the following prompts 1 - Reinstall version 0.5.16 pip install open-webui==0.5.16 --force-reinstall 2 - Force Docker to use the old version docker run -d -p 3000:8080 -v open-webui:/app/backend/data --name open-webui ghcr.io/open-webui/open-webui:v0.5.16 And it's all, everything is works again. NOTE: I tried to find the solution for 4 hours after identify the problem, the solution ahead works to me, if works to you too, let me know.
Author
Owner

@melianor commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

After update to 0.5.17, I had the same problem.

What I did

At Docker Stoped the container and click remove.

At CMD, the following prompts

1 - Reinstall version 0.5.16

pip install open-webui==0.5.16 --force-reinstall

2 - Force Docker to use the old version

docker run -d -p 3000:8080 -v open-webui:/app/backend/data --name open-webui ghcr.io/open-webui/open-webui:v0.5.16

And it's all, everything is works again.

NOTE: I tried to find the solution for 4 hours after identify the problem, the solution ahead works to me, if works to you too, let me know.

Rolling back to the last version is hopefully not the final resolution of this issue ;)

<!-- gh-comment-id:2688610607 --> @melianor commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): > After update to 0.5.17, I had the same problem. > > What I did > > At Docker Stoped the container and click remove. > > At CMD, the following prompts > > 1 - Reinstall version 0.5.16 > > pip install open-webui==0.5.16 --force-reinstall > > 2 - Force Docker to use the old version > > docker run -d -p 3000:8080 -v open-webui:/app/backend/data --name open-webui ghcr.io/open-webui/open-webui:v0.5.16 > > And it's all, everything is works again. > > NOTE: I tried to find the solution for 4 hours after identify the problem, the solution ahead works to me, if works to you too, let me know. Rolling back to the last version is hopefully not the final resolution of this issue ;)
Author
Owner

@washcontacnet1 commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

After update to 0.5.17, I had the same problem.
What I did
At Docker Stoped the container and click remove.
At CMD, the following prompts
1 - Reinstall version 0.5.16
pip install open-webui==0.5.16 --force-reinstall
2 - Force Docker to use the old version
docker run -d -p 3000:8080 -v open-webui:/app/backend/data --name open-webui ghcr.io/open-webui/open-webui:v0.5.16
And it's all, everything is works again.
NOTE: I tried to find the solution for 4 hours after identify the problem, the solution ahead works to me, if works to you too, let me know.

Rolling back to the last version is hopefully not the final resolution of this issue ;)

I agree, but, do you have the final solution?

I have the same trouble that you have.
OpenwebUI works on local host, but not work on IP.
I have a lot of user using by IP, and everybody was waiting a solution.

When the problem is solved at 0.5.17 version (or in another one), I will update again.

<!-- gh-comment-id:2688663408 --> @washcontacnet1 commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): > > After update to 0.5.17, I had the same problem. > > What I did > > At Docker Stoped the container and click remove. > > At CMD, the following prompts > > 1 - Reinstall version 0.5.16 > > pip install open-webui==0.5.16 --force-reinstall > > 2 - Force Docker to use the old version > > docker run -d -p 3000:8080 -v open-webui:/app/backend/data --name open-webui ghcr.io/open-webui/open-webui:v0.5.16 > > And it's all, everything is works again. > > NOTE: I tried to find the solution for 4 hours after identify the problem, the solution ahead works to me, if works to you too, let me know. > > Rolling back to the last version is hopefully not the final resolution of this issue ;) I agree, but, do you have the final solution? I have the same trouble that you have. OpenwebUI works on local host, but not work on IP. I have a lot of user using by IP, and everybody was waiting a solution. When the problem is solved at 0.5.17 version (or in another one), I will update again.
Author
Owner

@emrothenberg commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

After update to 0.5.17, I had the same problem.
What I did
At Docker Stoped the container and click remove.
At CMD, the following prompts
1 - Reinstall version 0.5.16
pip install open-webui==0.5.16 --force-reinstall
2 - Force Docker to use the old version
docker run -d -p 3000:8080 -v open-webui:/app/backend/data --name open-webui ghcr.io/open-webui/open-webui:v0.5.16
And it's all, everything is works again.
NOTE: I tried to find the solution for 4 hours after identify the problem, the solution ahead works to me, if works to you too, let me know.

Rolling back to the last version is hopefully not the final resolution of this issue ;)

I agree, but, do you have the final solution?

I have the same trouble that you have. OpenwebUI works on local host, but not work on IP. I have a lot of user using by IP, and everybody was waiting a solution.

When the problem is solved at 0.5.17 version (or in another one), I will update again.

You can use ngrok, as I detailed here in a previous answer:
https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/issues/10887#issuecomment-2688377059

<!-- gh-comment-id:2688676504 --> @emrothenberg commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): > > > After update to 0.5.17, I had the same problem. > > > What I did > > > At Docker Stoped the container and click remove. > > > At CMD, the following prompts > > > 1 - Reinstall version 0.5.16 > > > pip install open-webui==0.5.16 --force-reinstall > > > 2 - Force Docker to use the old version > > > docker run -d -p 3000:8080 -v open-webui:/app/backend/data --name open-webui ghcr.io/open-webui/open-webui:v0.5.16 > > > And it's all, everything is works again. > > > NOTE: I tried to find the solution for 4 hours after identify the problem, the solution ahead works to me, if works to you too, let me know. > > > > > > Rolling back to the last version is hopefully not the final resolution of this issue ;) > > I agree, but, do you have the final solution? > > I have the same trouble that you have. OpenwebUI works on local host, but not work on IP. I have a lot of user using by IP, and everybody was waiting a solution. > > When the problem is solved at 0.5.17 version (or in another one), I will update again. You can use ngrok, as I detailed here in a previous answer: https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/issues/10887#issuecomment-2688377059
Author
Owner

@sdcgi commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

For those using the docker image, just change the docker "run" command to use the previous version. Instead of

ghcr.io/open-webui/open-webui:main

use:

ghcr.io/open-webui/open-webui:v0.5.16

Having a really strange issue now. Rolled back to 0.5.16, can log in (no error) but the page is blank. But if you wait a few minutes the interface appears. Literally minutes. This can't have any connection to the 0.5.17 issue...can it??

<!-- gh-comment-id:2688678369 --> @sdcgi commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): > For those using the docker image, just change the docker "run" command to use the previous version. Instead of > > `ghcr.io/open-webui/open-webui:main` > > use: > > `ghcr.io/open-webui/open-webui:v0.5.16` Having a really strange issue now. Rolled back to 0.5.16, can log in (no error) but the page is blank. But if you wait a few minutes the interface appears. Literally minutes. This can't have any connection to the 0.5.17 issue...can it??
Author
Owner

@andyarcha commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

I also had the same issue and pulled v0.5.16 with docker. All works again on v0.5.16

<!-- gh-comment-id:2688726280 --> @andyarcha commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): I also had the same issue and pulled v0.5.16 with docker. All works again on v0.5.16
Author
Owner

@zmdtk commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

Same issue here. It is resolved by reverting back to previous version 0.5.16

<!-- gh-comment-id:2688746246 --> @zmdtk commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): Same issue here. It is resolved by reverting back to previous version 0.5.16
Author
Owner

@harrywang commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

#10909 I had the same issue

<!-- gh-comment-id:2688747183 --> @harrywang commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): #10909 I had the same issue
Author
Owner

@somera commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

Same here #10903

v0.5.16 -> works
v0.5.17 -> TypeError

<!-- gh-comment-id:2688765659 --> @somera commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): Same here #10903 v0.5.16 -> works v0.5.17 -> TypeError
Author
Owner

@TheMasterFX commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

Same

<!-- gh-comment-id:2688794803 --> @TheMasterFX commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): Same
Author
Owner

@spolspol commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

reported same here with more details: #10912

<!-- gh-comment-id:2688814406 --> @spolspol commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): reported same here with more details: #10912
Author
Owner

@TheMasterFX commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

If I go to "http://mydomain.com:3000/admin/settings" the page at least loads and you can edit some settings

<!-- gh-comment-id:2688835862 --> @TheMasterFX commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): If I go to "http://mydomain.com:3000/admin/settings" the page at least loads and you can edit some settings
Author
Owner

@erock530 commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

Seems crypto.randomUUID() only works behind SSL. See Link

I got it working using SSL behind nginx. I run open-webui in a docker container on a Linux server.

This is what I did as a workaround:

  1. Create a DNS entry on a domain you have control over (ex. llm.internal.domain.com) and point the A record to the internal IP of your server that hosts the openweb-ui.

  2. On the server that has both nginx installed and running the docker container:

$ sudo certbot certonly --manual --preferred-challenges dns -d "llm.internal.domain.com"

Follow certbot instructions.

Add the SSL lines for the generated certs to your nginx config that handles "llm.internal.domain.com" :

listen 443 ssl; server_name llm.internal.domain.com; ssl_certificate /etc/letsencrypt/live/llm.internal.domain.com/fullchain.pem; ssl_certificate_key /etc/letsencrypt/live/llm.internal.domain.com/privkey.pem;

Make sure you have appropriate proxy_pass lines.
location / { proxy_pass http://127.0.0.1:8080/; }

  1. restart nginx. Open your llm address in a browser: https://llm.internal.domain.com

Again, this worked for me for how I have the architecture built.

<!-- gh-comment-id:2688858420 --> @erock530 commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): Seems crypto.randomUUID() only works behind SSL. See [Link](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Crypto/randomUUID) I got it working using SSL behind nginx. I run open-webui in a docker container on a Linux server. This is what I did as a workaround: 1. Create a DNS entry on a domain you have control over (ex. llm.internal.domain.com) and point the A record to the internal IP of your server that hosts the openweb-ui. 2. On the server that has both nginx installed and running the docker container: `$ sudo certbot certonly --manual --preferred-challenges dns -d "llm.internal.domain.com"` Follow certbot instructions. Add the SSL lines for the generated certs to your nginx config that handles "llm.internal.domain.com" : ` listen 443 ssl; server_name llm.internal.domain.com; ssl_certificate /etc/letsencrypt/live/llm.internal.domain.com/fullchain.pem; ssl_certificate_key /etc/letsencrypt/live/llm.internal.domain.com/privkey.pem; ` Make sure you have appropriate proxy_pass lines. `location / { proxy_pass http://127.0.0.1:8080/; } ` 3. restart nginx. Open your llm address in a browser: https://llm.internal.domain.com Again, this worked for me for how I have the architecture built.
Author
Owner

@TheMasterFX commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

Maybe a fix could be that ENABLE_ONEDRIVE_INTEGRATION=False disables everything which has something to do with Onedrive (py + ts)

<!-- gh-comment-id:2688890986 --> @TheMasterFX commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): Maybe a fix could be that _ENABLE_ONEDRIVE_INTEGRATION=False_ disables everything which has something to do with Onedrive (py + ts)
Author
Owner

@spolspol commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

@erock530 forcing setup with additional proxy for SSL is not really solving the issue. It shold not be requirement.

<!-- gh-comment-id:2688905493 --> @spolspol commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): @erock530 forcing setup with additional proxy for SSL is not really solving the issue. It shold not be requirement.
Author
Owner

@erock530 commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

@spolspol

agreed. this was just a workaround that worked for me. I agree though, if SSL isn't being used, then using crypto.randomUUID() should be avoided and replaced with another func and not be a requirement.

<!-- gh-comment-id:2688919916 --> @erock530 commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): @spolspol agreed. this was just a workaround that worked for me. I agree though, if SSL isn't being used, then using crypto.randomUUID() should be avoided and replaced with another func and not be a requirement.
Author
Owner

@derekbsnider commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

Also having the exact same issue. Glad it's not just me. I'm running open-webui under WSL (without docker).

With Admin PowerShell I used this to allow external access:

netsh interface portproxy add v4tov4 listenport=3000 listenaddress=0.0.0.0 connectport=8080 connectaddress=[My WSL IP]
netsh advfirewall firewall add rule name="Allowing LAN connections" dir=in action=allow protocol=TCP localport=3000

Everything works fine with localhost:8080.

When using the 192.168.1.X:3000 address, I can log in, I can access the admin panel, but everything else displays "500: Internal Error" in the browser. This worked fine with the previous release.

<!-- gh-comment-id:2688928142 --> @derekbsnider commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): Also having the exact same issue. Glad it's not just me. I'm running open-webui under WSL (without docker). With Admin PowerShell I used this to allow external access: ``` netsh interface portproxy add v4tov4 listenport=3000 listenaddress=0.0.0.0 connectport=8080 connectaddress=[My WSL IP] netsh advfirewall firewall add rule name="Allowing LAN connections" dir=in action=allow protocol=TCP localport=3000 ``` Everything works fine with localhost:8080. When using the 192.168.1.X:3000 address, I can log in, I can access the admin panel, but everything else displays "500: Internal Error" in the browser. This worked fine with the previous release.
Author
Owner

@mcollinsece commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

Same issue. I'm fronting with a traefik load balancer, so I thought it was something with my routes. Spent 2 hours troubleshooting until I found this post. Downgrading to v0.5.16 fixed it.

<!-- gh-comment-id:2688939263 --> @mcollinsece commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): Same issue. I'm fronting with a traefik load balancer, so I thought it was something with my routes. Spent 2 hours troubleshooting until I found this post. Downgrading to v0.5.16 fixed it.
Author
Owner

@tjbck commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

Fixed with 0.5.18

<!-- gh-comment-id:2688968081 --> @tjbck commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): Fixed with 0.5.18
Author
Owner

@somera commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

Fixed with 0.5.18

Works now. Thx!

<!-- gh-comment-id:2689031737 --> @somera commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): > Fixed with 0.5.18 Works now. Thx!
Author
Owner

@tjbck commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

PSA: We Need YOUR Help!

First, I want to sincerely apologize for the recent issue with version 0.5.17. It has been resolved in 0.5.18, and I truly appreciate your patience. However, I want to take this moment to talk about something bigger—something we can’t fix alone.

The truth is, we’re not a big tech company with unlimited resources. We’re a small, dedicated team doing everything we can to make this project the best it can be, but we’re stretched thin. Mistakes happen, and while we move quickly to fix them, the reality is that we need more hands, more eyes, and more help.

That’s why we’re asking for your support. One of the biggest things you can do is use the :dev branch image instead of :main—it’s as simple as changing the Docker image tag to :dev. This helps us catch potential issues earlier, preventing headaches for everyone.

But beyond that, we need testers, contributors, bug reports, and feedback. Every little bit helps more than you can imagine. If you’ve ever wanted to be part of something meaningful—to help build and shape something great—now’s the time.

This community is only as strong as the people in it, and right now, we need YOU. If you can help in any way, please do. Together, we can ensure this project continues to thrive.

Thank you for being here. Thank you for believing in this. And thank you in advance for stepping up—you are what makes this possible. 💙

<!-- gh-comment-id:2689050489 --> @tjbck commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): **PSA: We Need YOUR Help!** First, I want to sincerely apologize for the recent issue with version 0.5.17. It has been resolved in 0.5.18, and I truly appreciate your patience. However, I want to take this moment to talk about something bigger—something we can’t fix alone. The truth is, we’re not a big tech company with unlimited resources. We’re a small, dedicated team doing everything we can to make this project the best it can be, but we’re stretched thin. Mistakes happen, and while we move quickly to fix them, the reality is that we need more hands, more eyes, and more help. That’s why we’re asking for your support. One of the biggest things you can do is **use the `:dev` branch image instead of `:main`**—it’s as simple as changing the Docker image tag to `:dev`. This helps us catch potential issues earlier, preventing headaches for everyone. But beyond that, we need testers, contributors, bug reports, and feedback. Every little bit helps more than you can imagine. If you’ve ever wanted to be part of something meaningful—to help build and shape something great—now’s the time. This community is only as strong as the people in it, and right now, **we need YOU**. If you can help in any way, please do. Together, we can ensure this project continues to thrive. Thank you for being here. Thank you for believing in this. And thank you in advance for stepping up—you are what makes this possible. 💙
Author
Owner

@somera commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

@tjbck sounds goot. I can set up a second instance myself. But I only have time to take a look at it once a week. It would be difficult to do it more often.

<!-- gh-comment-id:2689065525 --> @somera commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): @tjbck sounds goot. I can set up a second instance myself. But I only have time to take a look at it once a week. It would be difficult to do it more often.
Author
Owner

@melianor commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

PSA: We Need YOUR Help!

First, I want to sincerely apologize for the recent issue with version 0.5.17. It has been resolved in 0.5.18, and I truly appreciate your patience. However, I want to take this moment to talk about something bigger—something we can’t fix alone.

The truth is, we’re not a big tech company with unlimited resources. We’re a small, dedicated team doing everything we can to make this project the best it can be, but we’re stretched thin. Mistakes happen, and while we move quickly to fix them, the reality is that we need more hands, more eyes, and more help.

That’s why we’re asking for your support. One of the biggest things you can do is use the :dev branch image instead of :main—it’s as simple as changing the Docker image tag to :dev. This helps us catch potential issues earlier, preventing headaches for everyone.

But beyond that, we need testers, contributors, bug reports, and feedback. Every little bit helps more than you can imagine. If you’ve ever wanted to be part of something meaningful—to help build and shape something great—now’s the time.

This community is only as strong as the people in it, and right now, we need YOU. If you can help in any way, please do. Together, we can ensure this project continues to thrive.

Thank you for being here. Thank you for believing in this. And thank you in advance for stepping up—you are what makes this possible. 💙

I'll gladly give feedback as we here at home use open webui :)

<!-- gh-comment-id:2689119559 --> @melianor commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): > **PSA: We Need YOUR Help!** > > First, I want to sincerely apologize for the recent issue with version 0.5.17. It has been resolved in 0.5.18, and I truly appreciate your patience. However, I want to take this moment to talk about something bigger—something we can’t fix alone. > > The truth is, we’re not a big tech company with unlimited resources. We’re a small, dedicated team doing everything we can to make this project the best it can be, but we’re stretched thin. Mistakes happen, and while we move quickly to fix them, the reality is that we need more hands, more eyes, and more help. > > That’s why we’re asking for your support. One of the biggest things you can do is **use the `:dev` branch image instead of `:main`**—it’s as simple as changing the Docker image tag to `:dev`. This helps us catch potential issues earlier, preventing headaches for everyone. > > But beyond that, we need testers, contributors, bug reports, and feedback. Every little bit helps more than you can imagine. If you’ve ever wanted to be part of something meaningful—to help build and shape something great—now’s the time. > > This community is only as strong as the people in it, and right now, **we need YOU**. If you can help in any way, please do. Together, we can ensure this project continues to thrive. > > Thank you for being here. Thank you for believing in this. And thank you in advance for stepping up—you are what makes this possible. 💙 I'll gladly give feedback as we here at home use open webui :)
Author
Owner

@derekbsnider commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

PSA: We Need YOUR Help!

First, I want to sincerely apologize for the recent issue with version 0.5.17. It has been resolved in 0.5.18, and I truly appreciate your patience. However, I want to take this moment to talk about something bigger—something we can’t fix alone.

This was fixed pretty quick, so kudos to you!

<!-- gh-comment-id:2689300753 --> @derekbsnider commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): > **PSA: We Need YOUR Help!** > > First, I want to sincerely apologize for the recent issue with version 0.5.17. It has been resolved in 0.5.18, and I truly appreciate your patience. However, I want to take this moment to talk about something bigger—something we can’t fix alone. This was fixed pretty quick, so kudos to you!
Author
Owner

@aspwebchh commented on GitHub (Feb 28, 2025):

Last night's problem, did not fix, but peace of mind to sleep, should believe that wake up, 0.5.18 will certainly be released quickly, to solve the problem

<!-- gh-comment-id:2689620060 --> @aspwebchh commented on GitHub (Feb 28, 2025): Last night's problem, did not fix, but peace of mind to sleep, should believe that wake up, 0.5.18 will certainly be released quickly, to solve the problem
Author
Owner

@tomcatai commented on GitHub (Jun 16, 2025):

文件夹下面的env.exmple重新命名为env

<!-- gh-comment-id:2976835623 --> @tomcatai commented on GitHub (Jun 16, 2025): 文件夹下面的env.exmple重新命名为env
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/open-webui#16065