[GH-ISSUE #12553] feat: Should not enforce temporary chat by Default #136365

Closed
opened 2026-05-25 04:16:27 -05:00 by GiteaMirror · 4 comments
Owner

Originally created by @mobilestack on GitHub (Apr 7, 2025).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/issues/12553

Check Existing Issues

  • I have searched the existing issues and discussions.

Problem Description

If set default, now for each group of users other than admin, if they are able to temporarily chat previously, then they are by default enforced to temporary chat after upgrading to v0.6.0.

And, the real problem is, in such case they cannot switch by themselves, because they do not see the temp chat switch button now.

So this will affect a big bunch of users who already have the permission for temporary chat.

Desired Solution you'd like

Default to not enforced temporary chat.

Alternatives Considered

No response

Additional Context

No response

Originally created by @mobilestack on GitHub (Apr 7, 2025). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/issues/12553 ### Check Existing Issues - [x] I have searched the existing issues and discussions. ### Problem Description If set default, now for each group of users other than admin, if they are able to temporarily chat previously, then they are by default enforced to temporary chat after upgrading to v0.6.0. And, the real problem is, in such case they cannot switch by themselves, because they do not see the temp chat switch button now. So this will affect a big bunch of users who already have the permission for temporary chat. ### Desired Solution you'd like Default to not enforced temporary chat. ### Alternatives Considered _No response_ ### Additional Context _No response_
Author
Owner

@Classic298 commented on GitHub (Apr 7, 2025):

was already addressed in another PR

<!-- gh-comment-id:2782737833 --> @Classic298 commented on GitHub (Apr 7, 2025): was already addressed in another PR
Author
Owner

@mobilestack commented on GitHub (Apr 7, 2025):

was already addressed in another PR

ok, though I didn't see the exact same problem in PRs, but I guess there will be an update soon.

<!-- gh-comment-id:2783049199 --> @mobilestack commented on GitHub (Apr 7, 2025): > was already addressed in another PR ok, though I didn't see the exact same problem in PRs, but I guess there will be an update soon.
Author
Owner

@Classic298 commented on GitHub (Apr 7, 2025):

https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/pull/12260

see here

i think this went live with 0.6.1

<!-- gh-comment-id:2783993954 --> @Classic298 commented on GitHub (Apr 7, 2025): https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/pull/12260 see here i think this went live with 0.6.1
Author
Owner

@mobilestack commented on GitHub (Apr 7, 2025):

https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/pull/12260

see here

i think this went live with 0.6.1

I have seen that old groups was affected actually,rather than new groups, which is tackled in this PR you mentioned. I will wait for more time to make sure both have been solved.

<!-- gh-comment-id:2784767369 --> @mobilestack commented on GitHub (Apr 7, 2025): > https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/pull/12260 > > see here > > i think this went live with 0.6.1 I have seen that old groups was affected actually,rather than new groups, which is tackled in this PR you mentioned. I will wait for more time to make sure both have been solved.
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/open-webui#136365