mirror of
https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui.git
synced 2026-07-16 06:03:26 -05:00
[GH-ISSUE #24745] issue: Incorrect model used for title auto-generation when configured to Current Model, and the current model is changed in the dropdown menu
#123702
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Delete Branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @rotemdan on GitHub (May 15, 2026).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/issues/24745
Check Existing Issues
Installation Method
Docker
Open WebUI Version
Latest dev version
Ollama Version (if applicable)
No response
Operating System
Windows 11
Browser (if applicable)
Latest Brave
Confirmation
README.md.Expected Behavior
When title auto-generation model is set to
Current Model, it should use the model selected in the main model dropdown to generate the title, in any case, including in the case where the current prompt was regenerated or edited several times with different models.Actual Behavior
What currently happens is that clicking
Renameand then the stars icon to regenerate the title, the model selected for prompt regeneration is an arbitrary model somewhere from the history of models use for previous revisions of the prompt(s) for the current thread (I'm not sure but I think likely the first one used in the first revision), not the currently selected one (or the model used for the active revision of the prompt - which is a second plausible alternative).Steps to Reproduce
Renamebutton and the stars icon to regenerate the title, and observe which model is used for the taskYou should see that the model selected for title auto-generation is not impacted by the current model selected in the dropdown list, as well as the last model used to regenerate the response to the prompt.
Logs & Screenshots
(No relevant error messages or logs)
Additional Information
I initially reported the behavior in later messages in #24604, which was marked as fixed, but did not resolve the issue.
Due to the framing of that issue around a particular different error (which may or may not have been fixed), and being closed, I decided to open a new issue dedicated to this particular aspect of the problem, with the correct framing in the issue title.
@owui-terminator[bot] commented on GitHub (May 15, 2026):
🔍 Related Issues Found
I found some existing issues that might be related. Please check if any of these are duplicates or contain helpful solutions:
🟣 #24604 issue: Error "Model '' was not found" when auto-title generation is invoked
This is the direct precursor issue the reporter references. It describes auto-title generation using the wrong model history and failing when the selected model is unavailable, which is closely related to the same title-generation model selection path.
by rotemdan ·
bug🟢 #14681 issue: Current model set as Task model is reloaded to generate title with different keep alive parameter
This open bug is about the title-generation task reloading/using the current model after chat generation, showing the same 'current model' task-model flow as this issue. It appears to cover the same subsystem and could be a related regression in how the task model is chosen.
by trinhkvo ·
bug🟣 #16768 Issue #16768
This closed issue explicitly concerns title/tag generation offloading the current model, which is the same feature area. It likely overlaps with bugs in how title generation picks the active/current model.
by unknown
🟣 #13055 Issue #13055
This feature request is about making the API model used for title generation configurable, so it touches the same title-generation model-selection mechanism. It may provide historical context for why the current-model behavior exists and where it can break.
by unknown
💡 If your issue is a duplicate, please close it and add any additional details to the existing issue instead.
This comment was generated automatically. React with 👍 if helpful, 👎 if not.
@Classic298 commented on GitHub (May 15, 2026):
investigating
@Classic298 commented on GitHub (May 15, 2026):
https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/pull/24796
@tjbck commented on GitHub (May 19, 2026):
Should be addressed in dev.
@Classic298 commented on GitHub (May 19, 2026):
3c5e7968f0