[GH-ISSUE #15459] macOS Apple Silicon: x/z-image-turbo fails because libmlxc.dylib in Ollama.app is x86_64 #35642

Closed
opened 2026-04-22 20:18:19 -05:00 by GiteaMirror · 6 comments
Owner

Originally created by @cdevroe on GitHub (Apr 9, 2026).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/ollama/ollama/issues/15459

What is the issue?

I’m on an Apple Silicon Mac and ollama run x/z-image-turbo fails immediately.

This worked for me on February 26, 2026. Just in case it would help, I reinstalled Ollama, but the issue is still happening.

What I see:

  • uname -m -> arm64
  • file /Applications/Ollama.app/Contents/Resources/libmlxc.dylib -> Mach-O 64-bit dynamically linked shared library x86_64
  • file /Applications/Ollama.app/Contents/MacOS/Ollama -> universal binary with x86_64 and arm64

Server log shows Ollama starting an MLX image runner for x/z-image-turbo, then failing to initialize MLX because libmlxc.dylib is the wrong architecture.

Please let me know if there are any other details that I can provide that would help isolate the issue.

OS

macOS 26.4

CPU

M4 Pro

Ollama version

0.20.4

Originally created by @cdevroe on GitHub (Apr 9, 2026). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/ollama/ollama/issues/15459 ### What is the issue? I’m on an Apple Silicon Mac and `ollama run x/z-image-turbo` fails immediately. This worked for me on February 26, 2026. Just in case it would help, I reinstalled Ollama, but the issue is still happening. What I see: - `uname -m` -> `arm64` - `file /Applications/Ollama.app/Contents/Resources/libmlxc.dylib` -> `Mach-O 64-bit dynamically linked shared library x86_64` - `file /Applications/Ollama.app/Contents/MacOS/Ollama` -> universal binary with `x86_64` and `arm64` Server log shows Ollama starting an MLX image runner for `x/z-image-turbo`, then failing to initialize MLX because `libmlxc.dylib` is the wrong architecture. Please let me know if there are any other details that I can provide that would help isolate the issue. ### OS macOS 26.4 ### CPU M4 Pro ### Ollama version 0.20.4
GiteaMirror added the bug label 2026-04-22 20:18:19 -05:00
Author
Owner

@cdevroe commented on GitHub (Apr 9, 2026):

Sorry for the duplicate! I didn't think to search closed issues. Glad it is going to be resolved though! Thank you! 🙏

<!-- gh-comment-id:4216583209 --> @cdevroe commented on GitHub (Apr 9, 2026): Sorry for the duplicate! I didn't think to search closed issues. Glad it is going to be resolved though! Thank you! 🙏
Author
Owner

@cdevroe commented on GitHub (Apr 13, 2026):

@rick-github Will this roll into a release? It says 0.20.4 but as of 0.20.6 still not fixed.

<!-- gh-comment-id:4235877969 --> @cdevroe commented on GitHub (Apr 13, 2026): @rick-github Will this roll into a release? It says 0.20.4 but as of 0.20.6 still not fixed.
Author
Owner

@rick-github commented on GitHub (Apr 13, 2026):

The stale library issue should have been resolved with 0.20.5. Is your error still about libmlx.dylib? There are other Mac specific issues that should be resolved in 0.20.7.

<!-- gh-comment-id:4238749150 --> @rick-github commented on GitHub (Apr 13, 2026): The stale library issue should have been resolved with 0.20.5. Is your error still about libmlx.dylib? There are other Mac specific issues that should be resolved in 0.20.7.
Author
Owner

@cdevroe commented on GitHub (Apr 13, 2026):

@rick-github The error message re: MLX was the same. Happy to try it out. But it wasn't fixed and in the duplicate ticket that you referenced others are commenting the same.

<!-- gh-comment-id:4238770976 --> @cdevroe commented on GitHub (Apr 13, 2026): @rick-github The error message re: MLX was the same. Happy to try it out. But it wasn't fixed and in the duplicate ticket that you referenced others are commenting the same.
Author
Owner

@paul90 commented on GitHub (Apr 15, 2026):

@rick-github This is NOT fixed in 0.20.7

<!-- gh-comment-id:4251016785 --> @paul90 commented on GitHub (Apr 15, 2026): @rick-github This is NOT fixed in 0.20.7
Author
Owner

@cdevroe commented on GitHub (Apr 16, 2026):

@rick-github @dhiltgen Can this issue be re-opened please? (Or, any related one)

<!-- gh-comment-id:4260463041 --> @cdevroe commented on GitHub (Apr 16, 2026): @rick-github @dhiltgen Can this issue be re-opened please? (Or, any related one)
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/ollama#35642