github-starred/ollama
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/ollama/ollama.git synced 2026-05-06 16:11:34 -05:00
Code Issues 14.5k Packages Projects Releases 120 Wiki Activity

[GH-ISSUE #11289] SQLite - files in log folder #33205

New Issue
Open
opened 2026-04-22 15:38:45 -05:00 by GiteaMirror · 3 comments
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-22 15:38:45 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @Justinius on GitHub (Jul 3, 2025).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/ollama/ollama/issues/11289

What is the issue?

Installed 0.9.5.

Noticed that there are now db.sqlite* files in with the app.log and server.log.

Looking at the app.log I was looking at the logged messages (attached below)

Some of the files don't seem to exist in the current main branch - did 0.9.5 get released from a dev branch or something else?

Relevant log output

time=2025-07-03T13:13:32.053-05:00 level=INFO source=app_windows.go:259 msg="starting Ollama" app=C:\Users\xxxxxx\AppData\Local\Programs\Ollama version=0.9.5 OS=Windows/10.0.22631
time=2025-07-03T13:13:32.146-05:00 level=INFO source=app.go:187 msg="initialized tools registry" tool_count=4
time=2025-07-03T13:13:32.156-05:00 level=INFO source=app.go:202 msg="starting ollama server"
time=2025-07-03T13:13:32.156-05:00 level=INFO source=app.go:229 msg="starting ui server" port=58109
time=2025-07-03T13:13:35.156-05:00 level=INFO source=updater.go:238 msg="beginning update checker" interval=1h0m0s
time=2025-07-03T13:15:03.911-05:00 level=INFO source=ui.go:143 msg=site.serveHTTP http.method=GET http.path=/api/v1/settings http.pattern="GET /api/v1/settings" http.status=200 http.d=502.5µs request_id=1751566503910964000 version=0.9.5

OS

Windows

GPU

Nvidia

CPU

Intel

Ollama version

0.9.5

Originally created by @Justinius on GitHub (Jul 3, 2025). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/ollama/ollama/issues/11289 ### What is the issue? Installed 0.9.5. Noticed that there are now db.sqlite* files in with the app.log and server.log. Looking at the app.log I was looking at the logged messages (attached below) Some of the files don't seem to exist in the current main branch - did 0.9.5 get released from a dev branch or something else? ### Relevant log output ```shell time=2025-07-03T13:13:32.053-05:00 level=INFO source=app_windows.go:259 msg="starting Ollama" app=C:\Users\xxxxxx\AppData\Local\Programs\Ollama version=0.9.5 OS=Windows/10.0.22631 time=2025-07-03T13:13:32.146-05:00 level=INFO source=app.go:187 msg="initialized tools registry" tool_count=4 time=2025-07-03T13:13:32.156-05:00 level=INFO source=app.go:202 msg="starting ollama server" time=2025-07-03T13:13:32.156-05:00 level=INFO source=app.go:229 msg="starting ui server" port=58109 time=2025-07-03T13:13:35.156-05:00 level=INFO source=updater.go:238 msg="beginning update checker" interval=1h0m0s time=2025-07-03T13:15:03.911-05:00 level=INFO source=ui.go:143 msg=site.serveHTTP http.method=GET http.path=/api/v1/settings http.pattern="GET /api/v1/settings" http.status=200 http.d=502.5µs request_id=1751566503910964000 version=0.9.5 ``` ### OS Windows ### GPU Nvidia ### CPU Intel ### Ollama version 0.9.5
GiteaMirror added the bug label 2026-04-22 15:38:45 -05:00
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-22 15:38:46 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@cortseverns commented on GitHub (Jul 3, 2025):

This actually started happening with Windows in v0.9.4.

<!-- gh-comment-id:3033662491 --> @cortseverns commented on GitHub (Jul 3, 2025): This actually started happening with Windows in v0.9.4.
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-22 15:38:47 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@Justinius commented on GitHub (Jul 7, 2025):

@jmorganca @dhiltgen
In discussion over on Discord - it seems like the Settings UI that now exists in the tray comes from a private repo. The statement was "The core engine is MIT licensed, you can build a binary without the settings UI." So the fact that the statement implies that the settings UI might not be MIT is a bit concerning.

However, there is still no information or understanding on why the release for this repo contains artifacts from a different repo, why there were no release notes stating such. The feedback seems to be to build from source to not include it - which while an option seems to be what the release on the repo's page is for. To package what is in the repo.

It might be beneficial to have a plain installer built from here, and then an additional one download for the new settings panel, or make it configurable on whether it should be included during the install, with the default to "No" or something, might be an option.

<!-- gh-comment-id:3045752950 --> @Justinius commented on GitHub (Jul 7, 2025): @jmorganca @dhiltgen In discussion over on Discord - it seems like the Settings UI that now exists in the tray comes from a private repo. The statement was "The core engine is MIT licensed, you can build a binary without the settings UI." So the fact that the statement implies that the settings UI might not be MIT is a bit concerning. However, there is still no information or understanding on why the release for this repo contains artifacts from a different repo, why there were no release notes stating such. The feedback seems to be to build from source to not include it - which while an option seems to be what the release on the repo's page is for. To package what is in the repo. It might be beneficial to have a plain installer built from here, and then an additional one download for the new settings panel, or make it configurable on whether it should be included during the install, with the default to "No" or something, might be an option.
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-22 15:38:47 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@cortseverns commented on GitHub (Jul 31, 2025):

with v0.10.0 just being released, there appears to be way more than the sqlite dbs being present to be concerned with.

<!-- gh-comment-id:3138240843 --> @cortseverns commented on GitHub (Jul 31, 2025): with v0.10.0 just being released, there appears to be way more than the sqlite dbs being present to be concerned with.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
amd
api
app
bug
build
cli
cloud
compatibility
context-length
create
docker
documentation
embeddings
feature request
feedback wanted
good first issue
gpt-oss
gpu
harmony
help wanted
image
install
intel
js
launch
linux
macos
memory
mlx
model
needs more info
networking
nvidia
ollama.com
performance
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 python
question
registry
rendering
thinking
tools
top
vulkan
windows
wsl
No Label bug
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
GiteaMirror ninjasurge
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/ollama#33205
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?