github-starred/ollama
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/ollama/ollama.git synced 2026-05-07 00:22:43 -05:00
Code Issues 14.5k Packages Projects Releases 120 Wiki Activity

[GH-ISSUE #2455] Update rocm version for docker build to 6.0.2 #1435

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-04-12 11:20:21 -05:00 by GiteaMirror · 2 comments
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-12 11:20:21 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @mkesper on GitHub (Feb 11, 2024).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/ollama/ollama/issues/2455

Originally assigned to: @dhiltgen on GitHub.

Docker builds are still based against rocm-5.7.1. Rocm version 6.0.2 seems to work better so please offer at least a variant of the image with rocm 6.0.2.

Related PR: https://github.com/ollama/ollama/pull/2454

Originally created by @mkesper on GitHub (Feb 11, 2024). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/ollama/ollama/issues/2455 Originally assigned to: @dhiltgen on GitHub. Docker builds are still based against rocm-5.7.1. Rocm version 6.0.2 seems to work better so please offer at least a variant of the image with rocm 6.0.2. Related PR: https://github.com/ollama/ollama/pull/2454
GiteaMirror added the amd label 2026-04-12 11:20:21 -05:00
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-12 11:20:23 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@mkesper commented on GitHub (Feb 13, 2024):

Additionally: Would it make sense to offer the rocm image as a completely seperate image. It's quite a different product.

<!-- gh-comment-id:1940677215 --> @mkesper commented on GitHub (Feb 13, 2024): Additionally: Would it make sense to offer the rocm image as a completely seperate image. It's quite a different product.
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-12 11:20:23 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@dhiltgen commented on GitHub (Mar 11, 2024):

Additionally: Would it make sense to offer the rocm image as a completely seperate image. It's quite a different product.

Can you elaborate? Are you suggesting a separate ollama release or binary for rocm vs cuda? One of the key objectives we have is to streamline the user experience so a single app works across a broad set of GPUs and CPUs.

<!-- gh-comment-id:1989619384 --> @dhiltgen commented on GitHub (Mar 11, 2024): > Additionally: Would it make sense to offer the rocm image as a completely seperate image. It's quite a different product. Can you elaborate? Are you suggesting a separate ollama release or binary for rocm vs cuda? One of the key objectives we have is to streamline the user experience so a single app works across a broad set of GPUs and CPUs.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
amd
api
app
bug
build
cli
cloud
compatibility
context-length
create
docker
documentation
embeddings
feature request
feedback wanted
good first issue
gpt-oss
gpu
harmony
help wanted
image
install
intel
js
launch
linux
macos
memory
mlx
model
needs more info
networking
nvidia
ollama.com
performance
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 python
question
registry
rendering
thinking
tools
top
vulkan
windows
wsl
No Label amd
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
GiteaMirror ninjasurge
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/ollama#1435
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?