Originally created by @ValgulNecron on GitHub (Dec 28, 2024).
Hi at the moment if i give write per on a server, and also want this user to have access to stack, builder, etc.... on this server i need to manually give him.
i would really like if either write perm on a serve give access to stack and other stuff linked to this server or a "server admin" perm that would do the same without altering the already existing level.
Originally created by @ValgulNecron on GitHub (Dec 28, 2024).
Hi at the moment if i give write per on a server, and also want this user to have access to stack, builder, etc.... on this server i need to manually give him.
i would really like if either write perm on a serve give access to stack and other stuff linked to this server or a "server admin" perm that would do the same without altering the already existing level.
Yeah, I think the permissions regarding Server itself, vs Deployment / Stack that is on a Server, is a bit awkward currently.
@mbecker20 commented on GitHub (Jan 2, 2025):
Yeah, I think the permissions regarding `Server` itself, vs `Deployment / Stack` that is _on_ a `Server`, is a bit awkward currently.
It doesn't really fit the permission model to make this change. It keep everything straightforward to enumerate user access to resources. There are layer-able User Groups so it doesn't get too repetitive with many users too.
@mbecker20 commented on GitHub (Aug 26, 2025):
It doesn't really fit the permission model to make this change. It keep everything straightforward to enumerate user access to resources. There are layer-able User Groups so it doesn't get too repetitive with many users too.
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Originally created by @ValgulNecron on GitHub (Dec 28, 2024).
Hi at the moment if i give write per on a server, and also want this user to have access to stack, builder, etc.... on this server i need to manually give him.
i would really like if either write perm on a serve give access to stack and other stuff linked to this server or a "server admin" perm that would do the same without altering the already existing level.
@mbecker20 commented on GitHub (Jan 2, 2025):
Yeah, I think the permissions regarding
Serveritself, vsDeployment / Stackthat is on aServer, is a bit awkward currently.@mbecker20 commented on GitHub (Aug 26, 2025):
It doesn't really fit the permission model to make this change. It keep everything straightforward to enumerate user access to resources. There are layer-able User Groups so it doesn't get too repetitive with many users too.