github-starred/komodo
2
0
Fork 1
mirror of https://github.com/moghtech/komodo.git synced 2026-05-06 17:35:21 -05:00
Code Issues 3.5k Packages Projects Releases 103 Wiki Activity

[GH-ISSUE #759] Feature Request: Procedure Task "StackUpdate" #7477

New Issue
Open
opened 2026-04-27 21:13:21 -05:00 by GiteaMirror · 8 comments
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-27 21:13:21 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @marrobHD on GitHub (Aug 22, 2025).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/moghtech/komodo/issues/759

Hi,

the last release v1.19.0 changed the auto update behaviour.

Now there is a procedure task GlobalAutoUpdate.

It would be nice, if there was a task like StackUpdate, which checks if there is a newer stack image available, pulls it and redeploys the specified stack(s).

This would add more control over which stacks get updated when and how often, instead of all at the same time.

Thanks!

Originally created by @marrobHD on GitHub (Aug 22, 2025). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/moghtech/komodo/issues/759 Hi, the last release v1.19.0 changed the auto update behaviour. Now there is a procedure task GlobalAutoUpdate. It would be nice, if there was a task like StackUpdate, which checks if there is a newer stack image available, pulls it and redeploys the specified stack(s). This would add more control over which stacks get updated when and how often, instead of all at the same time. Thanks!
GiteaMirror added the enhancement label 2026-04-27 21:13:21 -05:00
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-27 21:13:26 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@undefinedid commented on GitHub (Aug 25, 2025):

Maybe you can take example from the samples dropped on the Discord Server by @mbecker20 :

Custom daily auto update Stacks / Deployments

const SKIP_STACKS = [];

// Pull Stacks
const stacks = (await komodo.read("ListStacks", {})).filter(
  (stack) =>
    !SKIP_STACKS.includes(stack.name) &&
    stack.info.state === Types.StackState.Running,
);
for (const stack of stacks) {
  await komodo.execute_and_poll("PullStack", { stack: stack.name });
}

// Update Stacks
const stacks_with_update = (
  await komodo.read("ListStacks", {
    query: { specific: { update_available: true } },
  })
).filter(
  (stack) =>
    !SKIP_STACKS.includes(stack.name) &&
    stack.info.state === Types.StackState.Running,
);
for (const stack of stacks_with_update) {
  console.log("Updating Stack:", stack.name);
  await komodo.execute("DeployStack", { stack: stack.name });
}

// Pull Deployments
const deployments = (await komodo.read("ListDeployments", {})).filter(
  (deployment) => deployment.info.state === Types.DeploymentState.Running,
);
for (const deployment of deployments) {
  await komodo.execute_and_poll("PullDeployment", { deployment: deployment.name });
}

// Update Deployments
const deployments_with_update = (
  await komodo.read("ListDeployments", {
    query: { specific: { update_available: true } },
  })
).filter(
  (deployment) => deployment.info.state === Types.DeploymentState.Running,
);
for (const deployment of deployments_with_update) {
  console.log("Updating Deployment:", deployment.name);
  await komodo.execute("Deploy", { deployment: deployment.name });
}

You'll find more scripted actions here: https://discord.com/channels/1272479750065094760/1283197688292048949/1391082533491572816

<!-- gh-comment-id:3218951171 --> @undefinedid commented on GitHub (Aug 25, 2025): Maybe you can take example from the samples dropped on the Discord Server by @mbecker20 : _Custom daily auto update Stacks / Deployments_ ``` const SKIP_STACKS = []; // Pull Stacks const stacks = (await komodo.read("ListStacks", {})).filter( (stack) => !SKIP_STACKS.includes(stack.name) && stack.info.state === Types.StackState.Running, ); for (const stack of stacks) { await komodo.execute_and_poll("PullStack", { stack: stack.name }); } // Update Stacks const stacks_with_update = ( await komodo.read("ListStacks", { query: { specific: { update_available: true } }, }) ).filter( (stack) => !SKIP_STACKS.includes(stack.name) && stack.info.state === Types.StackState.Running, ); for (const stack of stacks_with_update) { console.log("Updating Stack:", stack.name); await komodo.execute("DeployStack", { stack: stack.name }); } // Pull Deployments const deployments = (await komodo.read("ListDeployments", {})).filter( (deployment) => deployment.info.state === Types.DeploymentState.Running, ); for (const deployment of deployments) { await komodo.execute_and_poll("PullDeployment", { deployment: deployment.name }); } // Update Deployments const deployments_with_update = ( await komodo.read("ListDeployments", { query: { specific: { update_available: true } }, }) ).filter( (deployment) => deployment.info.state === Types.DeploymentState.Running, ); for (const deployment of deployments_with_update) { console.log("Updating Deployment:", deployment.name); await komodo.execute("Deploy", { deployment: deployment.name }); } ``` You'll find more scripted actions here: https://discord.com/channels/1272479750065094760/1283197688292048949/1391082533491572816
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-27 21:13:30 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@mbecker20 commented on GitHub (Aug 30, 2025):

Makes sense, it's feasible. I'm just struggling with the name.

This would be next to the other Stack executions, DeployStack, RestartStack, StopStack, PullStack etc... StackUpdate breaks the pattern.

The obvious one UpdateStack could easily be confused with /write/UpdateStack, so isn't great either.

Any ideas?

<!-- gh-comment-id:3239000854 --> @mbecker20 commented on GitHub (Aug 30, 2025): Makes sense, it's feasible. I'm just struggling with the name. This would be next to the other Stack executions, `DeployStack`, `RestartStack`, `StopStack`, `PullStack` etc... `StackUpdate` breaks the pattern. The obvious one `UpdateStack` could easily be confused with `/write/UpdateStack`, so isn't great either. Any ideas?
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-27 21:13:31 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@ChrispyBacon-dev commented on GitHub (Aug 30, 2025):

I recently updated to latest. I was first confused as I'm a developer and the automatic updater is not working anymore. Is it not possible anymore to have a checkbox for automatic updates of my stacks? When I push an update for an image usually komodo picked this up and redeployed it which is a huge helper when updating 6 instances on several VPS...

furthermore the feature to show that there is a new docker image available broke as well.

<!-- gh-comment-id:3239087434 --> @ChrispyBacon-dev commented on GitHub (Aug 30, 2025): I recently updated to latest. I was first confused as I'm a developer and the automatic updater is not working anymore. Is it not possible anymore to have a checkbox for automatic updates of my stacks? When I push an update for an image usually komodo picked this up and redeployed it which is a huge helper when updating 6 instances on several VPS... furthermore the feature to show that there is a new docker image available broke as well.
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-27 21:13:32 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@marrobHD commented on GitHub (Aug 30, 2025):

Makes sense, it's feasible. I'm just struggling with the name.

This would be next to the other Stack executions, DeployStack, RestartStack, StopStack, PullStack etc... StackUpdate breaks the pattern.

The obvious one UpdateStack could easily be confused with /write/UpdateStack, so isn't great either.

Any ideas?

Maybe AutoUpdateStack?

<!-- gh-comment-id:3239099781 --> @marrobHD commented on GitHub (Aug 30, 2025): > Makes sense, it's feasible. I'm just struggling with the name. > > This would be next to the other Stack executions, `DeployStack`, `RestartStack`, `StopStack`, `PullStack` etc... `StackUpdate` breaks the pattern. > > The obvious one `UpdateStack` could easily be confused with `/write/UpdateStack`, so isn't great either. > > Any ideas? Maybe AutoUpdateStack?
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-27 21:13:34 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@mbecker20 commented on GitHub (Aug 30, 2025):

@ChrispyBacon-dev the feature was moved from the background into the foreground, and now requires you to schedule it, see https://komo.do/docs/resources/auto-update

<!-- gh-comment-id:3239340811 --> @mbecker20 commented on GitHub (Aug 30, 2025): @ChrispyBacon-dev the feature was moved from the background into the foreground, and now requires you to schedule it, see https://komo.do/docs/resources/auto-update
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-27 21:13:35 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@ChrispyBacon-dev commented on GitHub (Aug 30, 2025):

Yes, I saw that, and to be honest, I don't like it. I develop applications, and it used to be that with auto-update, Komodo immediately picked up the new Docker image and pulled the latest image and redeployed my stacks, which was very convenient. Now I need to create a scheduled task, which is a step back, to be honest. The whole idea of having automated stacks goes out the window.

<!-- gh-comment-id:3239343921 --> @ChrispyBacon-dev commented on GitHub (Aug 30, 2025): Yes, I saw that, and to be honest, I don't like it. I develop applications, and it used to be that with auto-update, Komodo immediately picked up the new Docker image and pulled the latest image and redeployed my stacks, which was very convenient. Now I need to create a scheduled task, which is a step back, to be honest. The whole idea of having automated stacks goes out the window.
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-27 21:13:37 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@mbecker20 commented on GitHub (Aug 30, 2025):

@ChrispyBacon-dev maybe try using Build Deployment flow? Anyways it's off topic, please open another thread to discuss your concerns

<!-- gh-comment-id:3239353399 --> @mbecker20 commented on GitHub (Aug 30, 2025): @ChrispyBacon-dev maybe try using Build Deployment flow? Anyways it's off topic, please open another thread to discuss your concerns
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-27 21:13:40 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@rafo commented on GitHub (Sep 30, 2025):

Makes sense, it's feasible. I'm just struggling with the name.

This would be next to the other Stack executions, DeployStack, RestartStack, StopStack, PullStack etc... StackUpdate breaks the pattern.

The obvious one UpdateStack could easily be confused with /write/UpdateStack, so isn't great either.

Any ideas?

Maybe UpgradeStack?

<!-- gh-comment-id:3350871858 --> @rafo commented on GitHub (Sep 30, 2025): > Makes sense, it's feasible. I'm just struggling with the name. > > This would be next to the other Stack executions, `DeployStack`, `RestartStack`, `StopStack`, `PullStack` etc... `StackUpdate` breaks the pattern. > > The obvious one `UpdateStack` could easily be confused with `/write/UpdateStack`, so isn't great either. > > Any ideas? Maybe UpgradeStack?
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
1.19.0
1.19.1
1.19.2
1.19.3
1.19.4
2.0.0
bug
documentation
done
enhancement
help wanted
info
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 question
security
seen 👀
setup
thinking 🤔
ui
v2
No Label enhancement
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
GiteaMirror ninjasurge
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/komodo#7477
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?