mirror of
https://github.com/moghtech/komodo.git
synced 2026-05-09 05:37:46 -05:00
ResourceSyncPendingUpdate never goes away for multiple stacks that use the same compose configuration #292
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Delete Branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @aksvenk on GitHub (Apr 17, 2025).
Komodo version: 1.7.0
I have a resource sync to a git repo in a single flat file.
Resource sync completes successfully but the changes to similarly deployed stacks are always show as pending
ResourceSyncPendingUpdateHere is an example of 2 problematic stacks.
@mheidinger commented on GitHub (Aug 16, 2025):
Got the same issue for 3 out of 15 of my stacks. What they seem to have in common is that they have
poll_for_updates = trueset, all other stack don't have that set. I am aware that this is not the case for the original issue, but might be a hint?This is an example of such a problematic stack:
@mbecker20 commented on GitHub (Aug 28, 2025):
Hm, I cannot reproduce with the same TOMLs, is this still an issue?
@mheidinger commented on GitHub (Sep 9, 2025):
Unfortunately yes, is there any more information I can give you to help troubleshoot?
@la7eralus commented on GitHub (Oct 10, 2025):
I experienced the same issue. There was a diff shown, but no visible changes were displayed. However, I can't confirm that it's limited to stacks with poll_for_updates enabled, since my stack had that option disabled.
What helped in my case was simply running an execute. Right after that, the sync state immediately changed to OK.
I think it might be encoding related or something that the UI can't display in the preview frame.
The .toml in the git repo was generated by komodo, and there have been no manual edits to the file. All was completely managed by komodo.
Side note:
The affected resource did receive an update, but it had no actual effect.
@mheidinger commented on GitHub (Oct 14, 2025):
Can confirm that the workaround works, thanks!